Well, if you want to see all of the football games I don't think you will have a choice. I don't know the details, but I would assume that all of the ACC games that are on raycom now will be moved to the ACC network. It will be nice to finally see more than two baseball games a year too.I've been pretty meh about the concept of an ACC Network because honestly I don't think anyone will watch it. But if it works and makes the conference money, so be it.
I've been pretty meh about the concept of an ACC Network because honestly I don't think anyone will watch it. But if it works and makes the conference money, so be it.
It has to program smartly and not equally. Meaning, nationally, UNC baseball will draw many more viewers than Wake or Moo or Dook or VT or BC or Pitt baseball. UNC hoops vs. Coastal Carolina will draw many more viewers than VT hoops vs the same Chanticleers.I've been pretty meh about the concept of an ACC Network because honestly I don't think anyone will watch it. But if it works and makes the conference money, so be it.
If that is the plan, then I'm betting ESPN is going to push the UNC vs SC game and try to turn it into a rivalry. Not necessary a game that would be played every year, but more often than not.I've seen some speculation that ESPN wants even more ACC-SEC games now, to further cement the ties between the 2 leagues that have league networks with ESPN. If so, I want UNC to play Bama, Florida, Georgia, LSU, and Ole Miss. I reckon SoCar would be tolerable.
UNC-TN would make more sense sense UT doesn't have a yearly ACC rival. And yes I know UT backed out on us, but maybe they wouldn't if ESPN applied a little pressure this time around.If that is the plan, then I'm betting ESPN is going to push the UNC vs SC game and try to turn it into a rivalry. Not necessary a game that would be played every year, but more often than not.
I forgot about TN. You're right that they might try that. I would rather play SC instead of seeing that "orange" color TN wears. Seriously, is there a worse color than that? The game between Clemson and SC would make it harder to fit in, but I was thinking more along the lines of playing them every 4-5 years. That would be about the same as them being in the Atlantic division.UNC-TN would make more sense sense UT doesn't have a yearly ACC rival. And yes I know UT backed out on us, but maybe they wouldn't if ESPN applied a little pressure this time around.
New annual games ideaA couple more things about the network.
John Swofford on rights fees from ESPN: "There will be a bump in these next years until we get to the linear channel."
Also:
Wasserman Media Group consultant Dean Jordan and ESPN president John Skipper were among the legions whom the conference gathered Thursday at its annual football kickoff to confirm and fete the network’s creation, a collaboration with ESPN.
“If the network performs even moderately,” Jordan said, “it will put the ACC in a situation where they’ll be very, very competitive financially with the upper tier of the collegiate industry.”
The Big Ten network is Fox based. Obviously, ESPN gains if the ACC and SEC play even more games vs. each other, because they all are part of the ESPN package.New annual games idea
UNC-TN
VaTech-Auburn
Duke-Vandy
NCSU- Miss State
Pitt- WVU
Syr- Northwestern
Vir- Maryland
BC-Rutgers
Mia- Ga
WF- Purdue