This is a deal that seems to have grown over the last few years, it is as if every class has to try to be greater than the original Fab 5 were. But to me this is really a dumb way to look at things? If I am a one & done level player, I want to prove it beyond doubt and the very best way to do that is by winning as many games in that one college season as I can, the more my team wins the more the spotlight shines on me.
Would it not be smarter to go as a lone one & done guy to a program that has everything else covered with experienced players, they just need what you bring to the table to put them over that hump to the final 4, title game, cutting down the final nets?
Look at Marvin Williams, did not start for us, he was our 6th man on that title team. Marvin could have entered the draft right out of high school but was right on the cusp of being guranteed 1st round. So he elected to play for us with a heck of a team already in place, just needed that one more front court guy that would put them over the top and Marvin was the guy that had that one extra missing part. We all know how that worked out, great for UNC and GREAT for Marvin Williams.
But these young kids want to band together and groups of 3, maybe really talented but none have the experience of playing at this level. Seems to be by going as a group you make it less likely that you win at the highest level than more so. Yes, now 2 freshman driven teams have won it all? But where is karl Townes NCAAT ring, where is jabari Parker's NCAAT ring? They were 2 mega talented teams driven by freshmen that flamed out earlier than expected. That Ky team may well have been the most talented team at least in the last 20yrs or so but they did not play in the title game.
If you were a Bamba for example, why not go to a team that already has a great back court, already has a really good power forward but is missing that great rim protecting center that puts them over the top. Bolden for example looks like he is going to follow 4 other freshmen to duke rather than take a serious look at programs with established experienced players that he may be the only missing piece for them to win the next NCAAT?
Would it not be smarter to go as a lone one & done guy to a program that has everything else covered with experienced players, they just need what you bring to the table to put them over that hump to the final 4, title game, cutting down the final nets?
Look at Marvin Williams, did not start for us, he was our 6th man on that title team. Marvin could have entered the draft right out of high school but was right on the cusp of being guranteed 1st round. So he elected to play for us with a heck of a team already in place, just needed that one more front court guy that would put them over the top and Marvin was the guy that had that one extra missing part. We all know how that worked out, great for UNC and GREAT for Marvin Williams.
But these young kids want to band together and groups of 3, maybe really talented but none have the experience of playing at this level. Seems to be by going as a group you make it less likely that you win at the highest level than more so. Yes, now 2 freshman driven teams have won it all? But where is karl Townes NCAAT ring, where is jabari Parker's NCAAT ring? They were 2 mega talented teams driven by freshmen that flamed out earlier than expected. That Ky team may well have been the most talented team at least in the last 20yrs or so but they did not play in the title game.
If you were a Bamba for example, why not go to a team that already has a great back court, already has a really good power forward but is missing that great rim protecting center that puts them over the top. Bolden for example looks like he is going to follow 4 other freshmen to duke rather than take a serious look at programs with established experienced players that he may be the only missing piece for them to win the next NCAAT?