So what happens "if" both Huffman and Manley find their way in to the top 50 by the end of their seasons? I think we already know what will happen if they hover near where their current rankings are but what happens "if" they rise to solid 4 star status?
And "if" that happens, you're more than welcome to point out that you were right to me or whomever else. Because rationality
should dictate that it's extremely unlikely. But I know some of you like to bet on outlandish predictions simply because it involves our own. Regardless, I stick by what I said.
Huffman, the lower ranked guy and clearly the least expected played great vs Oak Hill, that is the type of thing that catapults you in the rankings. Many have already begun to see Huffman in a different light and if absolutely now in the discussion (opinion and hear say) of potentially being a strong 4 star and you may find the occasional whisper of 5 star if he were 2018 (weaker class of bigs).
By who? There's never been an article/quote/source of anyone saying this other than those on this board, yet is used as the defining point for both of these guys. It's like a piece of gossip around a watercooler that no one can verify. LOL Please stop with these "rumors" and "unnamed quotes" with no verifiable info
Manley was already being touted as a future maybe 5 star when he broke not only his leg one time but broke the other a year later so now being healthy would not make the suggestion he will as well see a major rise in his rankings as very expected.
"By who? There's never been an article/quote/source of anyone saying this other than those on this board, yet is used as the defining point for both of these guys. It's like a piece of gossip around a watercooler that no one can verify. LOL. Please, stop with these "rumors" and "unnamed quotes" with no verifiable info"
Point is that with both, the elements are in pace for a major rise from their current rankings so I am curious what the tone will be "if" what is expected occurs?
If these 2 come in and live up to the mountainous task you painted for them, then I can gladly admit I was wrong. Because what you're trying to claim is completely unrealistic.
But forget the rankings for a minute, We are losing 2 starters next year, and you're trying to convince me that both Manley and Huffman, one barely in the top 100, the other not even close to being ranked, will be just as good to contribute by day 1. Something that not even our current guys could do in their freshman year.
It amazes me how many details and facts some of you can ignore/overlook when it involves our own guys. We're looking at a poor man's 2012 class, and it's like many of you are convinced that all 3 of these guys below the top 100 are the next Buddy Hield.
There is a line between Optimism and Irrationality that many of you have completely blown past
You reference where Luke was ranked coming in, do you really believe that these 2 kids will be ranked at or below where even Luke was when they come in to UNC? "if" you do I don't think many experts would agree with ya.
LMAO weren't half of you were convinced that Maye would make a "huge jump" by his sophomore season? Now that's considered a bad comparison? How about J. James? Wasn't he potentially gone to the NBA in under 4 years? I don't know if you're all just blinded by the fact that they're committed to UNC, or just unwilling to admit to the absurdity of these claims.
So call it negative, or sky-falling, or whatever overused label you want, just don't go MIA if (and probably when) the results don't end in your favor.
And I don't know what "experts" you're trying to reference, but if it's anything like the "experts" we've seen on this board, you'll have to forgive me for not being eager to buy into these "analysis" yet again.