ADVERTISEMENT

CatsIllustrated.com - Error...

They banned me also because I was killing them in the NCAA scandal debate. They're packpride puppets & believe them word for word.
That's ok... I've got a nice surprise in store for them.
 
Well done!!! They, along with the Heels obsessed dolts at Devils Illustrated, are an endless source of comedic relief. BTW, the cult like twits at DI have page after page after page on a thread that contains OUR quotes here on this board!! Talk about obsession!!!

Imagine we as a fan base caring enough to bother spending any time, energy, or effort, copying and pasting the comments of the Lance Thomas Cover up college crowd on this board and then endlessly commenting on them???? Truly a pathetic bunch of losers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachdubausee
Ah, Rupp Rafters, the reigning Temple of Gloom.

They're just spewing their animosity -- at others and at each other -- because the current season ended for them like soooo long ago. What else are they going to do besides sit around the trailer in their wifebeaters and complain a lot?

The good news, now that you have been banished from hell, is the air will smell cleaner, food will taste better, cloudy days will virtually sparkle. Heck, I'll bet your IQ just jumped 50 points.
 
Banned, as well.
Never posted a word on their site...not a word. I did like some comments that were, in my opinion, fair or true.
They're just pissy because they sucked this year..."best class ever!", they got beat by Indiana and they are terrified of UNC having more success than UK.
If there was ever a "peter principle" it's alive and well on RR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2
If you think they are bad you should also visit Hokie Haven. Anti UNC threads have been top over there for at least 6 years. They are obsessed.
 
Why you guys worry about UK is beyond me. Those poor people are the most insecure fan base in sports.

If anything, laugh at their misery, but no reason to expect any civil discourse from the vast majority.
 
They banned me a year ago because they asked who would by the end be the better PG Ulis or Tyus Jones. I said Joel Berry. I guess Ulis was the right answer at ban for not answering correctly.
 
They have got the biggest cheater SOB to ever grace a basketball court, and they are talking about Carolina and something that may or may not even have anything happen about it?

What dumb asses!
 
Not sure why they want to eliminate discussion so much. Homers for sure. Both our board and the Duke's board tolerate discussion if one is respectful in your neighbor's house. At UK I truly believe I was banned for my username alone. I figure if a bunch of folks don't have any interest in discussing the sport then the loss is theirs not mine. Let them go on believing they are perfect. They are the ones looking like fools. There are of course a few exceptions and they know not only who they are but that they are welcome here anytime for discussion.
 
Not sure why they want to eliminate discussion so much. Homers for sure. Both our board and the Duke's board tolerate discussion if one is respectful in your neighbor's house. At UK I truly believe I was banned for my username alone. I figure if a bunch of folks don't have any interest in discussing the sport then the loss is theirs not mine. Let them go on believing they are perfect. They are the ones looking like fools. There are of course a few exceptions and they know not only who they are but that they are welcome here anytime for discussion.

I could not agree more 75, I actually enjoy discussing topics with fans of other programs as long as they are respectful to the house they are in. I will never understand the mindset of those that come from rival fan bases for no other reason than to start trouble, it to me is the action of a child, not an adult. Having an opposing view from my own is not something I consider as looking for trouble, being disrespectful to the house you are in as a guest is not something that can be tolerated.

Those very same folks that come here being dis-respectful in this UNC house would NEVER tolerate dis-respect in their own home so they are hypocrites of the highest order. Maybe we do have UNC fans that do that on rivals sites, thou I have never seen that, it would be no different. Pretty much why I don't post on rivals sites, because they do not care to discuss anything as soon as they realize I am a Tar Heel. I don't even like posting on the Rivals national board because the KY and duke fans seem to have taken that over and are allowed to say any crazy thing they desire.
 
One poster over there was saying that the NCAA was teaching his children that is was OK to cheat (referenced UNC class investigation).

All I said was "it is the parents job to raise their own kids".
BAM! I'm bounced.
to be realistic. Parents should raise their kids. But they also expect when their child goes to a University, their child should be looked over by a coach as a mother or father figure.

Most commitments now a days are because of the coach. Whether it be the parent or the child that feels wanted and safe to a certain coach.

To blame a kids parents of what their kid did on a campus is more than likely ridiculous. In some cases it could be true. But their parents aren't there.

So who is the responsible person who should be overseeing the kids? Should their parents move to the University and look after their child? Or should the coach that went into their living room and telling them he or she would look after them?

Just a question.
 
So who is the responsible person who should be overseeing the kids? Should their parents move to the University and look after their child? Or should the coach that went into their living room and telling them he or she would look after them?

If the individual is at least 18 (which almost all college students are) then it should be them looking after themselves... s/he is an adult! I don't get this. I knew damn well how to act - and the difference between right and wrong - and how to stay out of trouble, etc. when I was 18 years old. Why are we trying to give young adults a pass on how to behave now?
 
to be realistic. Parents should raise their kids. But they also expect when their child goes to a University, their child should be looked over by a coach as a mother or father figure.

Most commitments now a days are because of the coach. Whether it be the parent or the child that feels wanted and safe to a certain coach.

To blame a kids parents of what their kid did on a campus is more than likely ridiculous. In some cases it could be true. But their parents aren't there.

So who is the responsible person who should be overseeing the kids? Should their parents move to the University and look after their child? Or should the coach that went into their living room and telling them he or she would look after them?

Just a question.
The comment about raising kids was directed at the NCAA as an entity. Not the coaches.
 
to be realistic. Parents should raise their kids. But they also expect when their child goes to a University, their child should be looked over by a coach as a mother or father figure.

Most commitments now a days are because of the coach. Whether it be the parent or the child that feels wanted and safe to a certain coach.

To blame a kids parents of what their kid did on a campus is more than likely ridiculous. In some cases it could be true. But their parents aren't there.

So who is the responsible person who should be overseeing the kids? Should their parents move to the University and look after their child? Or should the coach that went into their living room and telling them he or she would look after them?

Just a question.
To be realistic, most people in college don't have some "mother or father figure" looking after them. It is time to grow up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heels Noir
to be realistic. Parents should raise their kids. But they also expect when their child goes to a University, their child should be looked over by a coach as a mother or father figure.

Most commitments now a days are because of the coach. Whether it be the parent or the child that feels wanted and safe to a certain coach.

To blame a kids parents of what their kid did on a campus is more than likely ridiculous. In some cases it could be true. But their parents aren't there.

So who is the responsible person who should be overseeing the kids? Should their parents move to the University and look after their child? Or should the coach that went into their living room and telling them he or she would look after them?

Just a question.
When I went to college I looked after myself. I got advice on things from guidance counselors & stuff but if it was really a problem it was a phone call home to mom & dad.
 
True story here. I went into the Cracker Barrel last night wearing my UNC Tar Heels 2016 ACC Tournament Champs T-shirt. In the front "store" area I looked around and saw a woman wearing a Kensucky T-Shirt. I looked at her, she looked at me, we looked at each others shirts - and she immediately dropped her eyes and turned away. She DID NOT want anything to do with a Tar Heel fan right now. :D
 
I agree with JC about coaches being the most important part of choosing where to attend college. Brings up the question what Cal is representing himself as. A way to the league and nothing else I would say. You better prove it because your replacement is already coming in next year. Nothing wrong with that approach, just not my cup of tea. Many have said it. Really fun to root for these guys the last 4 years, watching them develop and getting a sense for who they are. The more adversity and struggle the sweeter the success tastes.

Problem is you could be a lifelong UK fan and stick with it even if you don't like it. I am a Cowboys fan and have not forgiven Jerry Jones yet for pushing Tom Landry out. I am still a fan even though I don't like what is going on there today and will be thrilled when the Jones regime is gone. Could be the spot some UK fans are in.
 
To blame a kids parents of what their kid did on a campus is more than likely ridiculous. In some cases it could be true. But their parents aren't there.

So who is the responsible person who should be overseeing the kids? Should their parents move to the University and look after their child? Or should the coach that went into their living room and telling them he or she would look after them?

Just a question.

I would venture to say that how a kid is raised and the values instilled in him through his high school years, largely determines how he will act in college. If he has been raised properly and has developed a strong sense of ethics, he is much less likely to get into trouble when he leaves his parent(s) and goes to college.

After he gets to college, the coach is in a prime position to mentor him and help him to become a good citizen. No coach does a better job of being a surrogate father figure and developing character in his players than Roy Williams.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT