sign deal for 12 year series - 12 consecutive years played.
In case you do not know, the old way of making NDV platter everybody n even number of times is dead. Why should NE keep playing total nothings like Wake that will make ND's viewers go down in number? Why should Clemson or FSU or Miami?
Here is a quick take on the matter for all full ACC football members by CBS Sports: "The ACC's new revenue-sharing model provided an impetus to get the agreement done. As part of a settlement between the ACC and Clemson and Florida State, the ACC will now take 60% of the revenue it generates from its media deal with ESPN and distribute it to schools proportionally based on viewership figures over a rolling five-year period."
TV does NOT pay based on games won. It cannot. Why? Because every game has both a Wonner and a Loser. TV pays for viewers. If your league draws a whole lot of viewers, your league gets the big bucks. If your league with filled with teams that simply cannot cut the mustard in terms of drawing viewers, your league gets paid crap. And then your league gets headed toward death.
So now all ACC programs that draw the big TV audiences will get considerably more ACC TV money than those, like Wake, that always draw shit.
So now this Clemson-ND deal pouts everyone on notice: either you stop playing OOC garbage like ECU and Charlotte nd App SAT and there MAC and Sunbopet schools, to. else you watch a few ACC poprgrams just fly way past you ion revenue so that any some point you can never catch up.
That damned basketball thinking is going to be dead one way or another, sooner than later.
So now the matter is for the whole ACC. It is a good thing that schools now that draw well, which al; yeas mens also having decent of good OOC slates, will get paid for that. But if the bottom feeders in terms of ACC football drawing power are replaced wot teams able to draw much larger audiences, then the whole ACC will get paid more.
And that is what must be done to make certain that the ACC survives. Wake is as big a dead weight as Rice was to the SWC, which has been dead for a long time. The far northeast as a region is, with the exceptions of Penn St and ND games, just dead weight for CFB. So BC and Cuse are also permanent liabilities to the ACC.
In case you do not know, the old way of making NDV platter everybody n even number of times is dead. Why should NE keep playing total nothings like Wake that will make ND's viewers go down in number? Why should Clemson or FSU or Miami?
Here is a quick take on the matter for all full ACC football members by CBS Sports: "The ACC's new revenue-sharing model provided an impetus to get the agreement done. As part of a settlement between the ACC and Clemson and Florida State, the ACC will now take 60% of the revenue it generates from its media deal with ESPN and distribute it to schools proportionally based on viewership figures over a rolling five-year period."
TV does NOT pay based on games won. It cannot. Why? Because every game has both a Wonner and a Loser. TV pays for viewers. If your league draws a whole lot of viewers, your league gets the big bucks. If your league with filled with teams that simply cannot cut the mustard in terms of drawing viewers, your league gets paid crap. And then your league gets headed toward death.
So now all ACC programs that draw the big TV audiences will get considerably more ACC TV money than those, like Wake, that always draw shit.
So now this Clemson-ND deal pouts everyone on notice: either you stop playing OOC garbage like ECU and Charlotte nd App SAT and there MAC and Sunbopet schools, to. else you watch a few ACC poprgrams just fly way past you ion revenue so that any some point you can never catch up.
That damned basketball thinking is going to be dead one way or another, sooner than later.
So now the matter is for the whole ACC. It is a good thing that schools now that draw well, which al; yeas mens also having decent of good OOC slates, will get paid for that. But if the bottom feeders in terms of ACC football drawing power are replaced wot teams able to draw much larger audiences, then the whole ACC will get paid more.
And that is what must be done to make certain that the ACC survives. Wake is as big a dead weight as Rice was to the SWC, which has been dead for a long time. The far northeast as a region is, with the exceptions of Penn St and ND games, just dead weight for CFB. So BC and Cuse are also permanent liabilities to the ACC.
