If you have to recruit only one QB
- Thread starter state tree9
- Start date
Guess you are mad that Mitch is going to be the first QB picked in the draft.
Last edited by a moderator:
"were an student athlete" and cant reed....
3 errors in 1 sentence - nice work, you make fantastic points.
But the obvious answer is Mitch. Watson made way too many turnovers. Clemson's D could afford all those turnovers, UNC's D could not.
3 errors in 1 sentence - nice work, you make fantastic points.
But the obvious answer is Mitch. Watson made way too many turnovers. Clemson's D could afford all those turnovers, UNC's D could not.
You think Watson did it himself, or did the rest of the team have anything to do with it?
It sounds like you are ignoring the fact that there are 22 guys on the field rather than just one.
If you insist on discarding the fact that it is a team sport, go look at the completion percentages and turnovers.
If I get to have Clemson's D as well then the obvious answer is Mitch. Now that I've answered your question can you just go back to whatever moo u board that you normally post on?
Last edited by a moderator:
I wouldn't recruit either of them since they're both ineligible to play college football, bozo.
That said, I would join every NFL GM and scout out there in their assessment that Mitch is the better prospect.
That said, I would join every NFL GM and scout out there in their assessment that Mitch is the better prospect.
He's mad because his parents didn't have any children that lived.
What exactly are you trying to accomplish by coming over here? You seem to be very insecure about your own team. That's what makes it obvious you are a state fan.
That's why you started off the thread with a picture of Watson with a championship trophy instead of actually discussing strengths and weaknesses of the QBs. You pack fans are really bad at this. I almost feel sorry for you.
Trubisky is going to go higher in the draft. It's okay. Embrace it. BTW, what's on sale at the Anderson County Wal-Mart today?
On this note - how much does that suck for South Carolina? They try to claim the name "Carolina" but try as they might, everyone nationally considers Chapel Hill to be the home of Carolina. So then they try to take USC, but then the trojans bitch slap them in court so they can't use an SC logo that too closely resembles theirs, as everyone knows that USC is in LA. They can't catch a break on getting a name that isn't already dominated by a better known school.
Pretty soon I wouldn't be surprised if Jacksonville State says, sorry guys - but "Gamecocks" are our nickname, you clowns need to get a new one.
Pretty soon I wouldn't be surprised if Jacksonville State says, sorry guys - but "Gamecocks" are our nickname, you clowns need to get a new one.
"scar" works and nobody else has it. scar would be perfect for their official nickname. but i've got to admit i'll miss watching their cheerleaders yell "we love the cocks!"
Why did you put an apostrophe s on diploma? What is it showing ownership of? Why the question mark? You seem to be "trying" to make a statement. Also "Neither requires class"? You only mentioned one thing "UNC Diplomas" what is the other thing that doesn't require class? Oh Oh I get it now the other thing that doesn't require class is you , although I think you need some , at least in English.
Sorry to hear that you are having trouble with the law.
Careful...we'll have Swoffy put you on probation and fire your coach again.
Clemson offered me a full ride, but I didn't even get in to Carolina as a high school senior (transferred in after a year). Your thoughts?
^ touche. The bottom one was particularly inexcusable. Just an awful read (or lack thereof) of the defense.
His name will still be called before Watson's though.
His name will still be called before Watson's though.
BTW, I have nothing against Deshaun Watson. Dude is a baller and I love that he didn't go to Georgia.
I'd take Blake Bortles' ex-girlfriend
I was going to reply with Watson's interceptions last year, but apparently rivals won't let me post 17 gifs.
Hey, 12th is pretty close. Don't be so hard on yourself.
watson was the number 3 player in his class and you're telling me you would have taken mt over watson?
It's not that simple of a question and rankings have nothing to do with it. There are plenty of high ranking players that failed miserably and low ranked players who out performed their rankings. If Mitch played with Clemson's defense I think he would have won more games than he did at UNC. Would he have won the championship? I'm not sure, but that D was good enough to make up for any mistakes that were made on offense. Our D certainly wasn't.
a ranking in a class means something? Kiaro Holts was much higher OL rank than Spain, but are you going to trade Spain for Kiaro?
Give Mitch Clemson's OLINE and they wouldn't need a D, just need the ball last. Give him Clemson's D as well, and they would've cake-walked to the title.
Similar threads
