Rooting for him probably more then most if not all posting here. Was privy to some of his open runs back home "in the region".
As I said, when he came, the kid is all class, but saying it was all just a "botched" surgery and now they got it right, no problem, as some said here was plain silly. He is still big time and very skilled, huge upside, but a very different player then pre surgerylet alone the 2 surgeries. It was evident immediately after, but he was still VERY effective just not nearly as explosive, but he adapted.
There are pro athletes with "the best" nationally having similar issues, knee surgeries are not a given. It wasn't a "botched" initial surgery, it just did not "take". He is currently and has always worked his tail off. I'm rooting for him!!!!
While I have heard from multiple sources that his initial procedure was not done properly, it really does not matter because the result is the same. As I understand it, he had his initial procedure done, rehabbed and came back to play AAU. He knew something just was not right because the knee just felt weak, did not have any explosion. Because of this his ranking took a hit, he started trying to play more on the out side rather than fight inside, when he felt an increase in pain to the point he could not play in a tourney when it was determined that the initial procedure was not successful and another procedure was required. The second procedure was done by a doctor UNC had suggested, the rest is well known around these parts having watched him play last season. Did he try to come back and play AAU ball to soon, was the procedure in some way not done properly seem to be more likely reasons that simply saying "it did not take", how did it not "take"?
I think most already realize that a kid coming off a knee after just a year removed is not typically going to have similar explosion they had prior to the injury, that it is usually the second year back that we see how far the kid can come back. I would be really surprised if there is anyone here that does not know that, I think we all do. But just as real is that it is typically a bit longer for big men to come back than it is for the smaller guys, something about longer tendons and muscular structure, above my pay grade. But the accepted mark tends to be 2yrs to really know what ya got.
So I would ask you about your time line, 2yrs did not pass from the time he initially had his procedure to the time it was determined he needed a second, I think it was barely over a year when that was determined. IN any event, you, I, nor anyone else saw him play 2years removed to be able to know how much of his old self he would be able to regain. Since his last procedure we are now and only now sneaking up to that 2yr mark (It think it may be end of Oct when it is a full 2yrs, may even be later) and we have not seen him for full tilt lately.
Now I am not saying the kid is fully recovered and has lost none of his old explosion, maybe you have seen enough at this point but I have not and would suggest few have, for all I know you could be one of those very few but I think you can appreciate my being a bit skeptical in not ready accepting that "but a very different player then pre surgery let alone the 2 surgeries.".
IN addition, have to keep in mind this kid was a freshman last season, was not allowed to play until well in to the season (so he was WAY BEHIND) and that even had it not been for the knee issues he was still a kid that drastically needed to add strength and weight to compete with the full grown men in the college game. I am not wanting to throw shade at you or your opinion but I feel like maybe you are a bit premature in pronouncing him unable to get back to the level of player he was on course to be prior to that knee. You may well be right but I think we have to see him in games this coming season to get a feel for that.