Originally posted by WoadBlue:
Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
Well Mark, get with all your buds and quit drafting on "potential" alone!
Baseball rule would be grand Mark, take a look at it.
That is the only answer that can work. The NBA drafts on 'potential' and wastes fortunes. The higfh school players see those fortunes and want them ASAP, and so they do not work on mastering fundamentally sound team basketball.
The only way for the vicious cycle to close is to require 3 years in college once you sign.
Guys who do not want to go to college for 3 years are free to go overseas.
Maybe, Cuban is just sick and tired of that NBA team down the interstate a few miles who also pass the ball 3 or 4 times before settling for a high percentage shot.....Boring maybe to Cuban, but a team that has brought a lot of NBA Hardware to San Antonio since Pop and Duncan arrived, and are recognized as a team that plays the game the way it should be played.....I'm sure that Cuban wants Pop to change his style too, so the Mavs will have a chance in the future.....
I do however agree that the College game has steadily gone downhill ever since the Shotclock and the Three Point Shot were adotped by the College teams, and also agree that Player development has also taken a back seat in terms of producing fundamentally sound High School prospects....AAU is bigger than ever, and most of those teams are about the individuals, and the offensive skills that they themselves can promote to prospective College Coaches who may be recruiting them.....Also agree that the College Baseball model where a kid coming out of High School can elect to go to College for 3 years, or can choose the Major League Draft, is the best overall model for the High School Athelete, but the NBA Player's Assiocation(sp?) is not going to go for the Baseball Model, and likely never will, so the drafting based on "Potential" will continue, and I'm sure that Cuban will draft based on "Potential" as he always has done in the past....
Still remember Carolina Big Men back in the day going to California during the summer to train at the Pete Newell Big Man fundamentals' camp.....Don't know if it even exist anymore?
Read an article the other day about the Jacksonville team with Artis Gilmore who lost to UCLA in the final.....Hard to believe the offensive scoring that happened during that tourney....Long before the Shot Clock and 3pt Shot..... Most if not all of the teams in Jacksonville's Regional that year, scored in the 90's during the tourney, which was a far cry from the scoring we seen in this year's tournament or any recent tournaments for that matter....
I'm just not sold on the idea that fewer seconds on the shot clock will make a big difference since teams are already struggling to score points....Less time would generally mean worse decision-making, resulting in poor shot selection and possibilly even lower shooting percentages than we are already seeing?.....Guess we'll start getting some answers this coming fall when the shot clock is reduced from 35 to 30 seconds....?
Agree that something needs to be done, but believe that it's a much bigger problem than a couple of rule changes, will rectify.....