Most Despicable Crimes
- Thread starter JuleZ '02 HEEL
- Start date
Not sure about specific cases, but any crimes committed against children, the elderly, or animals turn my stomach.
Any "random" murder where the killer is just determined to kill and just happens upon a convenient victim. That terrifies me. All murder is bad, but I mean it's one thing to get killed by someone you know well who you've pissed off; it's a completely different thing entirely where you are simply in the wrong place or trust the wrong stranger and happen to cross the path of a Jeff Dommer or Ted Bundy who kills you due to no fault of your own.
Terrifying.
Terrifying.
Agreed. Personally, I think pedophiles should get the death penalty.
I think pedophilia will ultimately be state sanctioned. Pedophiles can't help themselves, it's in their DNA, their genes, whatever... Just a matter of time...
Killing strangers 10,000 miles away from your home because some ego-driven, soulless empty suit told you they were "enemies" so he could cash-in on the natural resource, or at least increase the bottom line of some munitions and ordinance manufacturer.
Why not? Homosexual behavior social taboo for most of human history; it was illegal in many, many states in the USA for several centuries; it was punishable by death in other countries for millennia; and, only recently (within the last 15-20 years) legalized. The parallels are obvious.
I'm not saying pedophilia should be legalized, but our civilization is on a trajectory that concerns me greatly. The unthinkable today could be reality in a relatively short period of time, perhaps in our lifetime...
That would be despicable if that was in fact the case, which it isn't. Nice try, though.
There is a huge percentage of Muslims that are 10K miles away that want nothing more than to kill Americans and freedom. Mein Kamf was still a best seller over there last I checked. If they die and we get natural resources I care little about the natural resources...I care nothing about the racist Muslims.
It's precisely what it is. They wrap it in a flag and slap a "Freedom and Democracy" sticker on it so people will buy it.
People over there are just as brainwashed and bullsh*tted by their "leaders" into wanting to kill strangers over here... or anywhere else. It's despicable to kill people, or even want to kill people, that have done absolutely nothing to you... period!
See, I'm pro-life across-the-board. I oppose abortions, I oppose executions, I oppose invading countries and killing innocent people and then occupying their land. I don't know many liberals or conservatives that can count all three.
Which Nazis? Innocent of what? Be more vague. Just because some Nazis were assh*les, doesn't mean I should emulate them by being an assh*le toward them, or any other group or individual.
Look, dude. I'm not condoning ANYONE that kills or murders! Okay? I don't condone the act of murder. Even if you think murdering them for murdering someone else is fixing the problem, I don't. You don't rape a person because they raped someone else, do you? If you did, do you think that cancels-out their rape?
If you feel okay about some people getting blown-up and some people not getting blown-up, fine. Don't give me sh*t for being opposed to anyone being blown-up. Deal?
Last edited:
First of all, calm down dude. I do not get how you get all of this "are you asking if I condone" BS out of four simple words I asked you.
The truth is all Nazi party supporters were guilty. If folks like you had been proactive instead of waiting to declare folks murders after the fact millions would have lived.
Your stance is situational not absolute. Some Muslim countries have declared their intentions the same way Hitler did. Ignore it if you want but it will only end in more blood.
He can't handle it because he's too busy imagining what they're doing naked.He's also incredibly ignorant to the varying histories of cultures and behavioral acceptances and forbidden activity.
I was recently watching Ken Burns 3-part documentary about Prohibition. The first episode takes place in the 18th-19th Century. The temperance movement also brought about some other changes. Example; in the late 1800's, the legal age of sexual consent went from age 10 to 16. Pedophilia was a much tougher sell in those days! "Under the Offences against the Person Act 1861, the age of consent was 12 ... was felonious unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under the age of 10, ... the age of consent to sixteen years as well as increased penalties for sexual offenses."
One of my best friends' mother was pregnant at 14, had her at 15 and married the same year (1965) in Oconee County, SC.
I'm not condoning pedophilia. I don't condone ANYTHING that is not consensual between those involved. It's just interesting how the ages have evolved. I keep thinking that people in the 19th Century matured faster than today. Maybe they had to. Then again, life expectancy was lower. My own grandmother (born 1911 in Patrick Co., VA) was the 2nd of 9 children where only 5 lived to adulthood. Her oldest sister was married with a daughter at 16.
Thanks for proving my point. As society devolves to it base state, pedophilia will become more and more accepted, as you demonstrated above. What is now considered pedophilia will become more and more accepted as a societal norm as devolution continues.
Societies and cultures shift ALL THE TIME! I'm not demonstrating that it's GOING BACK to that at all. Do you think the western cultures of the 1700's and 1800's, or even prior, were examples of humans at their "base state?" If so, then the Constitution, Magna Carta, Bible, and every other text we use as guidance today, that was written then, is clearly a hindrance since it was written by humans who were not evolved as they should be... according to you. It's not devolution if the society embraces it as the norm. It's just what it is- the norm. It's only abnormal to people that refuse to accept anything that doesn't meet their standard of "normal." That's not a bad thing because that usually helps instigate the shifts!
As impossible as it is for you to accept and understand, there is really no such thing as "Right and Wrong" at all. Those are literally human constructs that are continuously in flux. There is what works and what doesn't work. Right and Wrong are always subjective... ALWAYS! If the age of consent was 10, and it was working in a society, then it wasn't wrong! If the legal drinking age was 12, and it was working, then it's perfectly fine. If the age of consensual marriage is 10, and it's working, then it's "Right!" It's only wrong by your standards because you're not equipped to handle it since it's not the accepted norm for you and how you perceive your ideal society to be now. Unfortunately for you, not everything is measured by your personal interpretation and personal filter. If you had an ounce of humility, you'd understand that. It's perfectly fine, and totally understandable, for you to personally find it to be despicable or abhorrent. But, it doesn't make it "wrong." It only makes it wrong to YOU!
