I am not a lawyer...but this appears on the surface to be a negotiating tactic..or perhaps they want to play hard ball..
Comments please....
http://abc11.com/1572498/
Comments please....
http://abc11.com/1572498/
NCAA response to Carolina...NO Merit to any of your aarguments
- Thread starter keysersosay#1
- Start date
we already are lawyered up. the ncaa knows they put themselves squarely in a box the second they used the arguement that we dont control academics in the o'bannon case. they have to hope unc plays ball or this will get ugly for them.
i am no lawyer but it looks like a negotiation tactic to me they already sent an anoa. which to the shgrrin of all the prognosticators that want unc bball dead pretty much cleared men's bball and football can't be punished twice for the exact same crime. this is about hammering women's basketball which will happen unc just wants t o look like it is defending our women's program imho.
Personally, I think it's high time the NCAA was openly challenged. No school has ever been more forthcoming and cooperative. It's time their unlimited power was challenged.
However, if it is deemed that we lack institutional control then they can hit football and bball.
i love the part in ther when unc says statute of limintations was up the ncaa says willful cheating on this case makes an exception. Law is black and white I can't arrest someone and charge them with felonies on drugs dating back 10 yrs and say well their willful law breaking made an exception
this is true but how many colleges charged with that had all their sports hit. i think out women's program is going to end up with the short end of the stick on this. the ncaa is just setting that up. i would almost guarantee it.
Who cares. This already happened with Auburn and Michigan and they did nothing.
Past precedent has already been sent and if it goes before a court that will matter.
Past precedent has already been sent and if it goes before a court that will matter.
Totally inconsequential. What unc did was basically a move to have charges dismissed ploy used by allnlawyers in a court. It rarely works and basically just returns the status of the case to where it was prior. No damage done.
Gonna be some folks down to the firm earning some big bucks in 32 days.
I am hopeful our team will skewer their group and the NCAA.
I'd say take the 12 gauge, bore it out to 7 shots and show up at Hearing.
I agree with Archer, show up and do the show. Challenge the heck out of them. Make them regret going after member institutions. That and don't send them any more dues!
I am hopeful our team will skewer their group and the NCAA.
I'd say take the 12 gauge, bore it out to 7 shots and show up at Hearing.
I agree with Archer, show up and do the show. Challenge the heck out of them. Make them regret going after member institutions. That and don't send them any more dues!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't ESPN report the NCAA had some sort of meeting regarding our investigation, and Roy wasn't there (or invited) back in September?
I'll link the article if I find it.
EDIT: That was easy
I'll link the article if I find it.
EDIT: That was easy
Auburn's situation has less than zero to do with this case. There was never any allegation there concerning academics or anything remotely substantial about institutional involvement or control.
The NCAA is only responding to the message that we sent to them a week ago, here's what the NCAA's Enforcement staff received from UNC a week ago :
http://3qh929iorux3fdpl532k03kg.wpe...016/10/10.17.2016-BSK-Letter-to-Tom-Hosty.pdf
Our legal team is strong . . IMO, we have the NCAA in a box and they really don't want a fight.
jmho
http://3qh929iorux3fdpl532k03kg.wpe...016/10/10.17.2016-BSK-Letter-to-Tom-Hosty.pdf
Our legal team is strong . . IMO, we have the NCAA in a box and they really don't want a fight.
jmho
That's fair. They're taking on the jurisdictional claims, which shouldn't be unexpected since it is a direct challenge to some of their enforcement powers.
Not necessarily correct.
If your buddy ever represents you in a court of law, I sure hope he does it pro bono . . .
Folks . . go back to post #13 of this thread, (Heelmanwilm's) . . he's dead on as to how this legal game is being played out by both sides.
btw, when that man posts something, you may want to pay attention . .
btw, when that man posts something, you may want to pay attention . .
A regular Perry Mason eh??? Or did he stay at a Holiday Inn last night???
Right, and now it goes to the COI like it was going to anyway, right? This was basically just a 'hey, we are going to continue with the path we were already going down and don't really accept your contention that we can't rule on this'. The amended NOA is still just that and what the COI goes off. Is that correct?
UNC's response to the NCAA's response has already been sent. It basically says "the NCAA is full of crap and we'll see you on the 28th. Should you then continue down this course we will see you in court."
Pretty sure UNC has dug in it's heels and intends to fight. If the NCAA tries to over-step it's mandate they are going to end up in court and recent rulings have proven they are as toothless as most kaintuck fans.
If indeed the NCAA is in violation of their own rules, as seems to be the case, I suggest UNC lawyer up, fight, win, and seek punitive damages as well.
Just wish they worked as fast as they do on SEC football cases!
This is the rumor.
The "secret scrimmage" was this weekend, so I can't imagine basketball was involved if true.
the sec doesn't bend over from the jump with a welcome sign painted on its arse...they have "nothing to see here" signs all over campus and don't pickup the phone.
Similar threads
