North Carolina Adds Jae'lyn Withers From Transfer Portal
North Carolina added another piece in the transfer portal, and it should be a familiar face for Tar Heel Nation.
northcarolina.rivals.com
I think we want Ingram, Withers is more a 6th/7th man given his turnover and defense issues.Pleasant surprise. Most of the noise seemed to surround Ingram. Not that they are the same player, but they were often being discussed here at the same time.
Do we still have a good shot at Ingram, or are we less interested now?
Yea, I'm on the fence about this one. I get some Pete Nance vibes. Not the positional mis-fit. But Nance shot an uncharacteristically high percentage from 3 as a senior at Northwestern and everyone thought that would carry over, when in reality, Nance was more of the shooter he was his first 3 years at Northwestern.Not super excited about this because I just don’t know much about him. The fact that he was a middling player on a terrible team doesn’t make me feel warm and fuzzy about it. But I’ll give the staff the benefit of the doubt here and hope he was just poorly used at UL and attribute his pedestrian performance thus far to poor culture there.
Get Ingram through the portal, Cadeau to reclass and sign Mgbako and I’m feeling very good about next year.
Nance's back injury ruined his season.Yea, I'm on the fence about this one. I get some Pete Nance vibes. Not the positional mis-fit. But Nance shot an uncharacteristically high percentage from 3 as a senior at Northwestern and everyone thought that would carry over, when in reality, Nance was more of the shooter he was his first 3 years at Northwestern.
Withers had one really bad 3PT shooting season 23.4% and one really good 3PT shooting season 41.7%. So which one is he?
Him being more of a natural stretch 4 should help the fit organically. But I'm on the fence about it. Like Nance, will have to see whether the 3PT production was real or not.
As of right now, our starting 5 is probably: RJ, Wilcher, Wojcik, Wither, Bacot?
Right now, that's an NIT starting 5.
Washington's future is at the 5 spot. He doesn't have the mobility or athleticism to defend anyone outside of the paint. Heck UVA put Vander Plas at Center and Washington got absolutely roasted trying to guard him on the perimeter too.Withers is a better fit at the 4 next to Bacot than Washington is, and would be our starting PF if the season started today. He’ll be a senior and can shoot the 3, I like the pickup. Let’s add Ingram and Cadeau next 📝
Oh my, where to start? LOLYea, I'm on the fence about this one. I get some Pete Nance vibes. Not the positional mis-fit. But Nance shot an uncharacteristically high percentage from 3 as a senior at Northwestern and everyone thought that would carry over, when in reality, Nance was more of the shooter he was his first 3 years at Northwestern.
Withers had one really bad 3PT shooting season 23.4% and one really good 3PT shooting season 41.7%. So which one is he?
Him being more of a natural stretch 4 should help the fit organically. But I'm on the fence about it. Like Nance, will have to see whether the 3PT production was real or not.
As of right now, our starting 5 is probably: RJ, Wilcher, Wojcik, Wither, Bacot?
Right now, that's an NIT starting 5.
He averaged 8 pts a game. Hopefully he can do that hereNot super excited about this because I just don’t know much about him. The fact that he was a middling player on a terrible team doesn’t make me feel warm and fuzzy about it. But I’ll give the staff the benefit of the doubt here and hope he was just poorly used at UL and attribute his pedestrian performance thus far to poor culture there.
Get Ingram through the portal, Cadeau to reclass and sign Mgbako and I’m feeling very good about next year.
I didn't take Withers' freshman year numbers. The 23% 3PT year was his sophomore season and his 41% was last year, his junior season. The two seasons where his shooting numbers have the biggest sample size too. And I mentioned already that I think him being a natural 4 will organically make things better, relax.Oh my, where to start? LOL
I am not on the fence, this is a really good get for us, he is a stretchy 4 that moves so much better than Nance did and much more athletic over all. Nance to me was a bit plodding, especially for what you look for in a stretch 4. I am not saying Withers is Manek like as a shooter but he is more in the mold of what Bacot has expressed he wants to play beside.
News flash guys, Withers did not shoot great as a freshman, stop the presses, hold the headlines! LOL Kid shot a better 3pt % than ANYONE on our team did last season AND he is a athletic stretch 4 that is 6'8" and weighs in at 235lbs and you have a fence post up your butt? LOL
Nance was a 5 trying to pass as a stretch power forward, Withers is a 4 trying to be a 4 that can stretch as well, one guy played out of position and one is now being brought in to play his natural position.
If we started next season and had no more players, which is not going to be the case and we know it isn't, my starting line up would be Seth or more likely Wilcher at the point, Rj at the 2, Dunn at the 3, Withers at the 4, and Bacot. Seth, Jalen, Wojik, and High would all get solid PT. If we get Ingram I have him starting at the 3 and Dunn has a PT problem. And of course if we get Cadeau that changed up my whole back court look as well as who backs up who.
Post of the Day!Good news! We finally found SDung's natural position........
NIT is above your pay gradeRight now, that's an NIT starting 5.
Good one.Welcome to the Family, Mr. Withers!
We know who to Lean On!
If he's a 35% 3PT shooter it will really help us. Even if he turns out to be a 0 shooter, I think he has enough skill to help us more than last year's players. Puff couldn't dribble, Nance couldn't dribble, Bacot can't dribble. Withers looks like he can handle it a bit and he's comfortable handling.First off Jung, if I didn't mess with ya you would think something was wrong! LOL
Do I think this kid is a 40% 3pt shooter for us, no, I don't but I do think he can be a 35% guy and that is pretty sporty for what we need from a 4. But I think we can reasonably say that he should be closer to the player he was last season than the season or 2 before, we call that a kid developing their game, assuming they are playing in their natural position and the sample size is ample.
Bottom line it is about how a kid fits to what a team needs, Brady Manek was not on any NCAA AA teams but he fit what we needed, I think this kid fits area of need.
Coach Davis is doing a nice job with restocking our roster. I just believe that all of the hard work will pay off next fall...If Cadeau reclasses I think everybody’s shooting percentages will go up. They will be able to get shots off with less hand in their face because the ball will get there when it’s supposed to.