terrorist attack?
Looks like this idiot was on social media plotting this with some egging him on. I would link if I could from the phoneDoesnt look like it if 4chan and Reddit are correct, which they usually are.
Assuming by terrorism you mean attack carried out by Muslim
If true... holy crap! What is WRONG with people?Looks like this idiot was on social media plotting this with some egging him on. I would link if I could from the phone
If true... holy crap! What is WRONG with people?
Cory, I think that is it. Gun control won't work. People control won't work. Simply put, its the world we live in.I don't know what the answer to the question is but it isn't whatever the hell we have been doing. Maybe there is no answer.
The shooter singled out Christians:Looks like this idiot was on social media plotting this with some egging him on. I would link if I could from the phone
Cory, I think that is it. Gun control won't work. People control won't work. Simply put, its the world we live in.
Actually, it is the country we live in. No other developed nation in the world lives like this.Simply put, its the world we live in.
Didn't something very similar happen in Scandinavia a couple years ago? Paris France about a year ago?Actually, it is the country we live in. No other developed nation in the world lives like this.
There have been 294 mass shootings in the US this year.Didn't something very similar happen in Scandinavia a couple years ago? Paris France about a year ago?
Really? 294 mass shootings so far in 2015??? What is your definition of "mass shooting"? Did Obama speak out about all of them?There have been 294 mass shootings in the US this year.
It's true that the US is not in the top 100 of countries by murder rate worldwide. But we are #1 among industrialized nations. I don't think we should be patting ourselves on the back because our murder rate is better than Sudan's.
And no other country in the world is as large and diverse as we are.
If I hear another liberal start telling me about how great Denmark is I'm going to lose my mind.
I saw that, but wasn't sure if you were quoting that site... Do you agree with their definition?That number comes from the Mass Shooting Tracker, which uses a definition of four or more killed or injured by gunfire.
It's a subjective term, so I don't think there can be one "right" definition. This one is probably slightly over-inclusive because it would include situations in which several people were grazed or lightly wounded. But the FBI's definition (three or more killed by gunfire) is slightly under-inclusive because it wouldn't include situations like the Lafayette theater shooting this year where 2 were killed and 9 wounded. I think it's fair to say that, in most situations, if four or more people are wounded in a gun attack, it's a mass shooting.I saw that, but wasn't sure if you were quoting that site... Do you agree with their definition?
I was thinking along the lines of five or more killed by gunfire, but that is completely arbitrary on my part...It's a subjective term, so I don't think there can be one "right" definition. This one is probably slightly over-inclusive because it would include situations in which several people were grazed or lightly wounded. But the FBI's definition (three or more killed by gunfire) is slightly under-inclusive because it wouldn't include situations like the Lafayette theater shooting this year where 2 were killed and 9 wounded. I think it's fair to say that, in most situations, if four or more people are wounded in a gun attack, it's a mass shooting.