other than people not leaving, what helps this roster next year?...this is the same team as i see now.
DITTOOriginally posted by bleeduncblue:
Tokoto, Brice, Britt and Meeks all improved from last year ...if that trend continues for most of the rotation, you have your answer.
Reminder, it's a free country and you're welcome to choose another team if this one causes you so much pain and unhappiness.
This core has lost double digit games each season they've been at UNC. They are who they are.Originally posted by gteeitup:
other than people not leaving, what helps this roster next year?...this is the same team as i see now.
Brice is one of the softest PF's in the country. Every post up shot is a fade away when he can elevate right over his defender.Originally posted by gobblercalls:
Soft? Did you see the floater by JJ in the last minute. That took gonads from a freshman. You think Pinson and Berry are soft? Hicks is nowhere near soft. Tokoto isn't soft, he's just too cool If we catch a run of fairly called games from the officials I think some of this "soft" would disappear from Meeks and Johnson. Tokoto isn't soft, he's just too cool. If we played defense like Louisville and VCU Roy and Hubert would end up having to play!
Everyone improves and if Berry gets more burn at the 1, Paige becomes much more effective. Plus Meeks might be put through a regimen where he improves his hops- Kennedy would be hell with a 6" vertical.Originally posted by gteeitup:
other than people not leaving, what helps this roster next year?...this is the same team as i see now.
i probably expect more weekly and yearly...just seems it's a lot of two steps forward, one back...berry is a bright spot for me if he's used correctly...i like hicks a lot, but he also needs to be more assertive.Originally posted by UNC71-00:
Everyone improves and if Berry gets more burn at the 1, Paige becomes much more effective. Plus Meeks might be put through a regimen where he improves his hops- Kennedy would be hell with a 6" vertical.Originally posted by gteeitup:
other than people not leaving, what helps this roster next year?...this is the same team as i see now.
I understand a lot of your sentiments GTee, but you do sell this team short.
Unless we can add one of the top wing recruits, the only change is another year of maturity.Originally posted by gteeitup:
other than people not leaving, what helps this roster next year?...this is the same team as i see now.
Now that's optimism.Originally posted by dadika13:
I am so excited for next year's team. I honestly don't see how you can't be.
Paige healthy.
Brice another year of developing and becoming dominant down low.
JP continuing to improve and a lock down defender on the wing
Meeks has regressed slightly but another year for him to get in shape is good
The two guys I'm most fired up about:
Justin. This kid will be an absolute star next year. There is a reason he was a top recruit and he's finally showing it. Another year to be more assertive and stronger, he'll score 17-18 a game next year.
JB - This kid can run the point and we're finally seeing how he can shoot.
Please tell me a better starting 5 + 1 than JB and Paige in the backcourt, Justin on the wing, Brice and Meeks down low. With JP as a stopper off the bench. We have two guys that can score 17-18 a game, a guy down low who will average 14 and 10, and a PG who won't make mistakes.
If this team all comes back it's a top 3 team.
Not to be a downer, but if we're banking on Maye to come in and be the answer, I'll make other arrangements for March 2016 since I won't have a need to block off time to watch the Heels in the dance.Originally posted by Spaceytoyz:
Luke Maye as only a three star will give better numbers than Simmons, Hubert and James Combined, if he gave you 6/6 a game that would be more than those three combined..
I love that starting 5 but you won't see it barring injury. Roy has deferred to upperclassmen and he won't bench JP in his senior season regardless.Originally posted by dadika13:
I am so excited for next year's team. I honestly don't see how you can't be.
Paige healthy.
Brice another year of developing and becoming dominant down low.
JP continuing to improve and a lock down defender on the wing
Meeks has regressed slightly but another year for him to get in shape is good
The two guys I'm most fired up about:
Justin. This kid will be an absolute star next year. There is a reason he was a top recruit and he's finally showing it. Another year to be more assertive and stronger, he'll score 17-18 a game next year.
JB - This kid can run the point and we're finally seeing how he can shoot.
Please tell me a better starting 5 + 1 than JB and Paige in the backcourt, Justin on the wing, Brice and Meeks down low. With JP as a stopper off the bench. We have two guys that can score 17-18 a game, a guy down low who will average 14 and 10, and a PG who won't make mistakes.
If this team all comes back it's a top 3 team.
It is coaching and regardless, I think that Roy has earned that right to make that decision. I often wonder if the outcome would've been different in 09 when Ginyard got hurt and Danny Green stepped into the starting line up.Originally posted by gteeitup:
^^^ so is that coaching?...not benching a player because he's a senior?...he talked about this a few years ago and i almost threw up.
Has Roy earned the right to start underperforming seniors over better underclassmen? Maybe.Originally posted by Tru Blu Tar Heel:
It is coaching and regardless, I think that Roy has earned that right to make that decision. I often wonder if the outcome would've been different in 09 when Ginyard got hurt and Danny Green stepped into the starting line up.Originally posted by gteeitup:
^^^ so is that coaching?...not benching a player because he's a senior?...he talked about this a few years ago and i almost threw up.
Just making a corollary based on the fact of Roy sticking with a player that is thought as a defensive specialist (Tokoto/Ginyard) over the overall better player (Berry/Green).Originally posted by Hark_The_Sound_2010:
Has Roy earned the right to start underperforming seniors over better underclassmen? Maybe.Originally posted by Tru Blu Tar Heel:
It is coaching and regardless, I think that Roy has earned that right to make that decision. I often wonder if the outcome would've been different in 09 when Ginyard got hurt and Danny Green stepped into the starting line up.Originally posted by gteeitup:
^^^ so is that coaching?...not benching a player because he's a senior?...he talked about this a few years ago and i almost threw up.
Will that decision ulitmately hurt the team? Yes.
Would I rather have a team that wins games as opposed to one that rewards its underperforming seniors with more PT? Absolutely.
Also, not really sure what the Ginyard/Green dynamic has anything to do with it... they were both seniors in 09 (Ginyard got an extra years eligibility due to the injury and was allowed to play in 2010 as well).
Answer to what? What he will do is push guys like Brice-Meeks to give it all they got or he will be coming in. FORGET the ranking, this kid just has it. Let's give him a chance before we throw him under the bus.Originally posted by Hark_The_Sound_2010:
Not to be a downer, but if we're banking on Maye to come in and be the answer, I'll make other arrangements for March 2016 since I won't have a need to block off time to watch the Heels in the dance.
He has a cleaner better looking shot than anyone on the team other than paige right now.. You tube him he is a complete playerOriginally posted by mikeirbyusa:
Answer to what? What he will do is push guys like Brice-Meeks to give it all they got or he will be coming in. FORGET the ranking, this kid just has it. Let's give him a chance before we throw him under the bus.Originally posted by Hark_The_Sound_2010:
Not to be a downer, but if we're banking on Maye to come in and be the answer, I'll make other arrangements for March 2016 since I won't have a need to block off time to watch the Heels in the dance.
Ouch on that extra year in '10.Originally posted by Hark_The_Sound_2010:
they were both seniors in 09 (Ginyard got an extra years eligibility due to the injury and was allowed to play in 2010 as well).
Need the NCAA to get out of town!Originally posted by LifeboatParty:
Actually more concerned about the year after.
Gina
fwiw, the ncaa will not be dong anything to hinder the future of carolina basketball...if the coaching staff is not relaying that to high school stars, then shame on them...if opposing coaches are relaying that, then so be it.Originally posted by mikeirbyusa:
Need the NCAA to get out of town!Originally posted by LifeboatParty:
Actually more concerned about the year after.
Gina