ADVERTISEMENT

Stats and stuff (State game)...

gary-7

Hall of Famer
Jan 27, 2003
20,834
16,428
113
Parts Unknown
Survival is the theme of this one. We survived in spite of:
- shooting only 38% from the floor, 25% from 3, and an uncharacteristic 12/19 FTs.

- only 3 points from Marcus, and only 18 minutes and 6 pts from Brice because of foul trouble

- letting State clod up the tempo and only scoring 67 w/ only 3 guys in double figures.

Stuff:
- As I posted this week, the key issue would be how our Bigs responded to their "physical" inside play. Started badly --- Brice's first silly foul made him timid and Kennedy wasn't being strong enough with his moves --- but give credit, that improved dramatically in the second half (and I'm sure Roy blistered some 6'9" butts at halftime.

- Speaking of "physical", State's bruisers were getting away with 2-handed push-unders on the offensive glass. If things are supposed to be called tighter THAT needs to be the next point-of-emphasis.With all that we still managed to out-rebound them, and our increased aggression paid off beating them on the offensive glass and on second-chance points.

-The bad news is that we still didn't finish thru contact strongly enough --- Even though we had 17 Assists on 25 made FGs, we blew several Assists (5 of Berry's alone). It was however good to see Meeks play big (in the second half especially). He finished with 23 pts and 5 Offensive boards.

- By and large we played damned good defensive game (again, especially in the second half in which we held them to 33.3% FGs). Our Bigs started challenging every shot. And here's what I REALLY liked from our Bigs. I'm sure Roy knew they were gonna slow it down and run Isolations --- our Bigs finally did their jobs and helped when our Guards forced baseline on drives! THAT folks is the difference between this game and the N. Iowa game in a nutshell.

- Our Guards had good defensive games despite being dwarfed by State's. Marcus did a good job on Rowan. Nate played hard and did some good ball-hawking in his minutes and Joel Berry did a number on Barber. JB had Cat most of the night and the ACC's leading scorer was held to 9, with only 5 coming vs JB. Oh, and he had 5 TOs (Are we seeing a pattern here?... Melo, Cat, Alford, et al, all having rough times holding onto the rock vs our boy Berry? Hmmm...). JB's nasty blocked shot against him that caused a subsequent TO was the coup de grace. Somehow he only got credit for 1 Steal in the melees (shoulda been 2), but he caused 5 more TOs!

- They won the tempo battle, but we kept pushing. We only had 2 true FB pts, but 21 came off the Secondary Break. That persistence paid off. Good win. 5-0. baby!

Oh, and one last thing --- that Offensive Foul call on Jackson on the break was total BS! Even Dookie V recognized it. That should have been a 3-pt play. Fortunately, we, um... survived that :cool:
 
Hi Gary, I enjoy reading your post after each game my friend. I liked you calling Joel Berry A NASTY DOG.

!!!!!!!!!!!! GO TAR HEELS !!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Solid observations Gary. Keep 'em coming.
Reading Adam Lucas' column just now reminded me of something I meant to put in. Roy going away from the hard hedge (which I'm not a big fan of) on high ball-screens helped us maintain defensive floor balance and helped enable the aforementioned block help from our Bigs on Iso drives.
 
Reading Adam Lucas' column just now reminded me of something I meant to put in. Roy going away from the hard hedge (which I'm not a big fan of) on high ball-screens helped us maintain defensive floor balance and helped enable the aforementioned block help from our Bigs on Iso drives.
I read that too Gary.
Nice to know Roy can change and adapt his defenses to suit the situation.
 
I read that too Gary.
Nice to know Roy can change and adapt his defenses to suit the situation.
Yeah, Roy likes to attack and force, but I've never been a fan of the hard-hedge. Just makes it too easy for things to break down, and makes it harder for Bigs to recover to the paint.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, Roy likes to attack and force, but I've never been a fab of the hard-hedge. Just makes it too easy for things to break down, and makes it harder for Bigs to recover to the paint.
We're in agreement re: the hard-hedge Gary. Joel and Nate's defense against the Cat Burglar was outstanding! And Kennedy's play surpassed my hopes. For us to win despite poor overall shooting and subpar games from ourmtwo stars is impressive.

We haven't played nearly as well as we can and are a top five team. When we start to click on all cylinders, watch out!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary-7
I think Roy mentioned at halftime Pinson, Johnson, Meeks, Jackson only had 1 defensive combined! That's a shocker
 
Only 12 of NC State's 43 shots came from 3. That's a substantially lower rate than what we typically allow. I think that played a huge factor. We defended it well at 33%, but if we allow teams to make 4 and attempt fewer than 30% of their shots being 3's, I don't think that's a recipe to beat us.

One thing that I'll keep an eye on... We're a heavy 2-point reliant team this year and depend a lot on mid range jump shots (typically an inefficient shot). We were making around 47% of 2 point jumpers, which is incredibly high. I'm expecting a regression there. Yesterdays game was by far our worst 2 point offensive game in ACC play. We're shooting 55% from 2's in conference play, we shot 44% yesterday.

The defensive rebounding has been somewhat average all year when Johnson isn't on the floor. He's an elite defensive rebounder. He's 7th in the country in defensive rebounding percentage. He was off yesterday, but when he's not on the floor, we're average at controlling the defensive glass.

Our bigs getting into routine foul trouble is probably a pattern now. For the season:

Hicks: 6.2 fouls/40 minutes
Johnson: 4.8 fouls/40 minutes
Meeks: 3.9 fouls/40 minutes

James and Maye are by far our best in that regard. But for our key rotation of the 3 bigs, that's a concern and something that needs to be rectified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shun1
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT