I think the people ranking Louisville as high as 10 for 2 main reasons: 1) the team is balanced (a D that could be well above average and an offense that could be very explosive); and 2) Bobby Petrino is accepted as a coach who can win big.Is UofL that much better than us? Sorry, I just don't see that. I have no problem with us starting the season ranked 21st. But if we're 21st, no way in Hades that UofL is 10th. I'm just sayin'...
Louisville plays FSU their 3rd game and Clemson their 5th. Someone is going to lose, obviously.
I believe we can stomp GA. We'll see. They have a tough defense but doubt they can slow down our offense, and our defense should be much better with everyone healthy.
If that's the case, the first 5 games of the season are packed with ranked teams playing one another. We could very well end up ranked very high going into the Florida State game, assuming we beat GA, Illinois, James Madison and Pitt, which is all very doable if we're on our game.
October 1st, we walk into Tallahassee. Hate to play them at home. I am still bullish, however. We can do it.
Some other games to take note of.
Pitt opens against Villanova and then Penn State, Oklahoma State and then us. That's a pretty brutal 4 game stretch to start the season. Doubt they will be ranked but would still love to see them win their first 3 games before meeting us. One can dream, I suppose.
Notre Dame plays Michigan State their 3rd game. That's one ranked team with a loss, and probably both ranked ahead of us going into the game.
Stanford plays USC 2nd game, then UCLA and then Washington and then Washington State, then Notre Dame. There are going to be ranked teams with losses here as well.
One game at a time but I like the way the overall football scheduling is this year in terms of our chances should we win. Need to beat Georgia right out of the gate and not look back.
If Pitt wins those first three I imagine they will be ranked.
If we start 4-0 we could be potentially slide into the Top 10 going down to Tallahassee.
Y'all need to slowwww your roll on Top 10 talk lol. I don't know how we're going to crack the Top 10 with an L to UGA on our schedule.
UGA troll.Y'all need to slowwww your roll on Top 10 talk lol. I don't know how we're going to crack the Top 10 with an L to UGA on our schedule.
I'd say they weren't. They finished 8-5, including a 4-4 record in the SEC. They did beat then ranked 15th ASU in the first game of the season but ASU went on to finish 6-7 overall and 4-7 in the PAC10 which was very weak last year.This is by far the highest I've seen anyone rank Louisville. I guess Petrino has a fairly proven track record in college and apparently their QB is the second coming of Michael Vick. They're also getting a lot of mileage out of that Tex A&M bowl win, but was A&M really all that good last year?
"An argument based on false premises can be much more difficult to refute, or even discuss, than one featuring a normal logical error, as the truth of its premises must be established to the satisfaction of all parties."Y'all need to slowwww your roll on Top 10 talk lol. I don't know how we're going to crack the Top 10 with an L to UGA on our schedule.
Coaches poll sees Louisville in a vastly different light. They're ranked 23rd, behind us at 20.I think what they see in Louisville is a team that went 6-1 their last 7 games....after starting off losing three in a row with a young QB. And two of those three losses were to teams that won a New Years Six or Playoff Game.
That QB dissected A&M in the bowl and had over 500 yards in the spring game.
They are betting on potential with a maturing QB.
Though I quoted your post, when I said the coaches see it in a vastly different light, I meant as compared to this particular poll (Stewart Mandel) which has them #10Actually...the Coaches see it in the same light....the question the poster sort of asked was how does an 8-5 Louisville get preseason ranked...by the Coaches Poll.
And, too boot, not that far behind a UNC that was 11-3 last year.
I answered that....
I thought 4-4 in the SEC was equivalent to finishing 50-0 in the other conferences? I mean, the SEC is so good they could beat all these pro teams right?They finished 8-5, including a 4-4 record in the SEC.
I'll give them credit for being the best football conference, year in and year out. But I hope to see the ACC kick a little SEC heinie this year.I thought 4-4 in the SEC was equivalent to finishing 50-0 in the other conferences? I mean, the SEC is so good they could beat all these pro teams right?
Don't be ridiculous. Going 4-4 is not equal to going 50-0 elsewhere. 4-4 in the SEC is equal to 12-0 elsewhere.I thought 4-4 in the SEC was equivalent to finishing 50-0 in the other conferences? I mean, the SEC is so good they could beat all these pro teams right?
As long as it's not Moo or Dook, I am all for ACC teams beating everybody they play OOC.I'll give them credit for being the best football conference, year in and year out. But I hope to see the ACC kick a little SEC heinie this year.
Actually, I have no problem rooting for dook in football, unless we're playing them of course. My main problem with dook is the jerk they have for a coach.As long as it's not Moo or Dook, I am all for ACC teams beating everybody they play OOC.
Actually, I have no problem rooting for dook in football, unless we're playing them of course. My main problem with dook is the jerk they have for a coach.
Now i could NEVER ROOT FOR NVSU, not even in bass fishing.