Texans

[jcolucci]

 

[Blue2010]

Damn.

 

[tarheel0910]

 

[TarHeelNation11]

I GIS "hot texas chicks" and got this as a result. I present without comment and will now log off the internet:

 

[Raising Heel]

I GIS "hot texas chicks" and got this as a result. I present without comment and will now log off the internet:

3, 5, 1, 4, 2

Method 1

 

[TarHeelNation11]

3, 5, 1, 4, 2

Method 1

5, 3, 2, 4, 1.

 

[TarHeelNation11]

Wait, @Raising Heel I need clarification because I think I did it wrong. The way I did it was, I took each girl in left to right order, then assigned them a comparative ranking with 1 being the hottest (or "would-est") and 5 being the least. Do you do it that way, or do you simply number them 1 to n from left to right, then list them in order of hotness?

Let me explain with an example. If I thought the second girl from the left was the hottest, would "2" be my first number in the list, or would the second entry in my list be ranked 1...?

 

[Raising Heel]

Wait, @Raising Heel I need clarification because I think I did it wrong. The way I did it was, I took each girl in left to right order, then assigned them a comparative ranking with 1 being the hottest (or "would-est") and 5 being the least.

That's Method 2, noob. Also, it is wrong. #M1forLife

Determining the Official Method for Rank 'Em Threads

The Reader's Digest version:
Method 1: Re-Ordering the Picture in terms of hotness/bangability
Method 2: Ranking the Picture from Left to Right

 

[tarheel0910]