Was reading on TOS that Pitt likes to stack the box w/ 8 or 9 a BUNCH of the time. Is that true? I haven't seen a Pitt game this year. If true, they'll either NOT do that, or they will pay a heavy, heavy price Thurs. night. We'll play the stick routes and the boundary screens to death, and if we don't break them for TDs, the majority of the time we'll get big gains....we execute those plays really well most of the time (ugh, I HATE the preponderance of East-West-y stuff we do, but so be it if an opponent plays in such a way that it's effective). And if they cheat their DBs up enough to engage the blockers in shallow enough space to minimize the stick/screen damage, they become very vulnerable to the long ball in the form of the skinny post, and stop and go routes.
I simply think Narduzzi is too good a coach to do that. Is Fed a good enough coach to prep/plan for the probability that Narduzzi won't stack the box, and not take that tendency as gospel to where our 1st 10 play script and/or gameplan in general is ineffective? Or, can Narduzzi bait Fed into trying for the homerun at inopportune times (ala this past Sat., up 13-10 in the 2nd Q and moving at will, then got greedy and had the INT)?