What was he raided for? I would think privilege would be attached to any info related to Trump.
ETA: It looks like it's possibly due to bank fraud and wire fraud related to the Stormy payment. Seems like a stretch based on public info, not sure what they have behind the scenes.
That's 100% incorrect. It absolutely matters what they were looking for. If it wasn't on the warrant, then it can't be used. Doesn't matter what they find. The rules for breaking privilege are extremely strict.Fun part is, it doesn't matter what they were looking for. They now have his lawyer's records from the past few decades working with Trump, and any evidence of a crime can be used to prosecute that crime, regardless of whether or not it is related to the original investigation.
Technically speaking, he didn't make the decision to pass it off. He has no power to do that. Rosenstein made that decision.Mueller passed this errand off to the Southern District of NY for a couple reasons most likely, old Bobby 3 Sticks is being shrewd and tactical in his moves as he furthers this investigation.
That's possible, but unless it's proof of a crime related to Daniels, it can't be used (assuming the reports are correct and that was the reason for the warrant). If protocol is followed, the people investigating it won't even see the records that don't involve the investigation. Breaking privilege is a really hard thing to do and is always narrowly interpreted. It will be interesting to see what they find out and if the court will allow it.Oh Lordy, there has to be some real treasures in this raid
Fun part is, it doesn't matter what they were looking for. They now have his lawyer's records from the past few decades working with Trump, and any evidence of a crime can be used to prosecute that crime, regardless of whether or not it is related to the original investigation
That's 100% incorrect. It absolutely matters what they were looking for. If it wasn't on the warrant, then it can't be used. Doesn't matter what they find. The rules for breaking privilege are extremely strict.
Perfect. So we're finally going to get a conclusive ending here. Either A) Trump is impeached or B) We can finally have everyone calling for him to be prosecuted and impeached STFU.
No more, oh Trump's hiding this, or that. No "if Mueller can only get a little more information on X". He either gets impeached or everyone calling for his impeachment needs to shut up and eat some crow. What do we put as a timeline for this... a year?
Technically speaking, he didn't make the decision to pass it off. He has no power to do that. Rosenstein made that decision.
Perfect. So we're finally going to get a conclusive ending here. Either A) Trump is impeached or B) We can finally have everyone calling for him to be prosecuted and impeached STFU.
No more, oh Trump's hiding this, or that. No "if Mueller can only get a little more information on X". He either gets impeached or everyone calling for his impeachment needs to shut up and eat some crow. What do we put as a timeline for this... a year?
Actively looking through documents doesn't count as plain view. I suppose if during the course of seizing the records, they saw a bloody knife on the desk that would constitute plain view, but I doubt that happened.Plain view doctrine. He can't just look for anything he wants, but if in the course of looking for what's on the warrant, he stumbles on to other damning evidence, then that would still be admissible.
That's sort of true as long as the evidence pertains to the potential crime on the warrant. The real world is different than TV.I don't know enough the laws pertaining to breaking privilege to really comment on that, but I've heard legal experts argue that if there's evidence a crime has been committed, then those privileges go out the window.
They don't necessary have to have control. All they need is one third +1 since you need two thirds to impeach.republicans could still choose not to impeach him if they control the house
Yeah I'm sure we'll all be eating crow real soon. That definitely seems like the most plausible outcome, especially after we learned all about Don Jr's stupidity.
Him being impeached is a political outcome. The investigation could be perfectly damning, and republicans could still choose not to impeach him if they control the house. Intelligent people will base their view on the preponderance of evidence from the investigation. Not what politicians choose to do with that evidence. This question almost entirely hinges on the midterms in November.
Why is a timeline needed . . ?
If 45 isn't dirty, so be it . . that doesn't mean he isn't a POS.
Agreed. He definitely is a POS. But you've been the one beating the dirty drum, so if he comes out un-impeached... that'd be a little embarrassing, no?
It's not about the party, it's about the donors. And if you think democrats are any different you haven't been paying attention.for the pubbies it's always been Party before Country,
It's not about the party, it's about the donors. And if you think democrats are any different you haven't been paying attention.
All I'm saying is one side will be eating crow. It'll either be the "Go Trump Go, he can't do anything wrong!" crowd, or the "Tick Tock Tick Tock he's getting impeached any day now" crowd. It doesn't much matter to me, I'd just like to see this thing settled once and for all.
Impeachment is the proper barometer to use here though. Because otherwise, we'll just be hearing "That nasty Trump, clearly guilty of treason, tax fraud, and of course pedophilia - but his cronies had his back!!!!1!1!".
This is a binary outcome. He was as bad as everyone said he was - and he gets impeached... or he wasn't bad enough to get impeached.
What constitutes him being bad enough to be impeached still depends on the congress though. Obviously a republican congress would be less likely to impeach a republican president than a democratic president. And vice versa.
True. But ultimately I want a conclusion to people saying he is/has committed treason, tax fraud, and whatever else they come up with. At some point, if he's not found guilty of it - people need to shut up about it.
Otherwise people could just go off and say Obama was born in Kenya, and it's only because of his cronies and Congress that he was allowed to get away with it. Which also gets old after awhile if you can't prove it.
So it looks like Syria is at it again (I'm not going to start another political thread).
Well, I wouldn't consider something that happened a few days ago old news. All of the statements coming out about retaliation certainly isn't old news.Okay, thanks . . old news, I thought something else may have transpired since.
Well, I wouldn't consider something that happened a few days ago old news. All of the statements coming out about retaliation certainly isn't old news.
Just 3 days ago lolOkay, thanks . . old news, I thought something else may have transpired since.
Good riddance, wish we had term limits so all would get the hell out. I'm glad crying shumer and dumbass pelosi are hanging around right now though, it's great for the good guys for those two idiots to remain in office.How 'bout that Ryan dude that won't be running again . . ? The 3rd most powerful man in DC and he's bailing out of the mess that 45 has created.
Okay, thanks . . old news, I thought something else may have transpired since.
I hadn't heard about it yet. That's really messed up, we should do something about it, no?
Incorrect. A simple majority of those present and voting in the House is required for impeachment. The Senate requires a two-thirds majority to convict.They don't necessary have to have control. All they need is one third +1 since you need two thirds to impeach.