ADVERTISEMENT

UFC

Hark_The_Sound_2010

Hall of Famer
Nov 10, 2009
12,387
15,238
113
Boston
Anyone else watch that McGregor vs Diaz fight? Might be the best fight I've ever watched. When compared to the complete joke show that was the Mayweather Pacman fight I can't believe Mayweather got paid a quarter billion to dance around and play patty cake while these guys got 5mil each or so to put it all on the line. The UFC is really starting to grow on me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gteeitup
i only watch the hyped up fights like last night...i like boxing better as a whole, but yes, that was pretty damn good...i actually thought it was a draw, though.

seems like such a tough sport to judge when it goes down like last night.

btw, if you ever want to watch for free, i have this link i've used for years that i go through...worked last night.
 
Anyone else watch that McGregor vs Diaz fight? Might be the best fight I've ever watched. When compared to the complete joke show that was the Mayweather Pacman fight I can't believe Mayweather got paid a quarter billion to dance around and play patty cake while these guys got 5mil each or so to put it all on the line. The UFC is really starting to grow on me.
I didn't see the fight, but I heard Diaz say he was hurt pre-fight. Did he look encumbered in any way?
 
I watched it and thought it was a really great fight as well. I don't dislike mcgregor but I was really pulling for Nate. His swagger is just something I find awesome. Can't wait for part 3.
 
I don't like UFC. It makes me mad actually because I love boxing and while boxing has done a nice job of ruining itself, UFC sure has hurt the sport as well. Plus, a good boxer is an artist. I can't look at a good UFC fighter the same way. I respect their talent. But it's just not pleasing to the eye for me.
 
I don't like UFC. It makes me mad actually because I love boxing and while boxing has done a nice job of ruining itself, UFC sure has hurt the sport as well. Plus, a good boxer is an artist. I can't look at a good UFC fighter the same way. I respect their talent. But it's just not pleasing to the eye for me.
You could make the argument that boxing ruining itself opened the door for UFC to come gain popularity. It's laughably pathetic how much boxing ruined itself.
 
You could make the argument that boxing ruining itself opened the door for UFC to come gain popularity. It's laughably pathetic how much boxing ruined itself.

Ya, exactly. I've never been that much into either of them. But I can say that after watching this recent fight, I'm actually somewhat interested in seeing what the the next UFC event has on the card and will probably try to watch it.

I can say I'll never pay for, and probably never watch even if it's free, any boxing match again - after I wasted my time/money on that billion dollar Dancing With the Stars episode that was billed as Mayweather v Pacquiao.
 
I can say I'll never pay for, and probably never watch even if it's free, any boxing match again - after I wasted my time/money on that billion dollar Dancing With the Stars episode that was billed as Mayweather v Pacquiao.

Heads up - this is going to be tl;dr for most of y'all.

I was pretty excited for that fight. I admit that. But deep down I kind of knew it was going to disappoint. I didn't buy it. I went to a friend's house (a girl who knows more about boxing than anybody else I know). But here's the deal, the more you follow boxing, the more you'll know which fights to make sure to watch and which to leave alone. It's kind of backwards, but a good general rule of thumb is that if a boxer has already made it to the point where his fights are megafights on PPV and they cost a ton, that fight probably isn't worth watching. The best fights are when young, hungry fighters are trying to make a name for themselves and coming up through the ranks. And then there are some guys you just don't want to miss. Stick to the free broadcasts on HBO. They have great coverage and usually the fights are pretty good. Even when one guy is the dominant fighter of his weight class, if you follow boxing enough you'll know when that fighter is fighting a guy who's style could make for a good fight (you know the old adage that "styles make fights" - it's totally true).

Here are some descriptions of fighting styles for guys from different parts of the world. This is just my non-expert opinion but it might help you in determining whether or not you want to see a guy fight:

- Eastern European fighters are usually tough physically but weaker mentally. They have a rigid and methodical style and like holding their hands high - very little fluidity.
- Western Euro fighters love the jab but they usually don't move that well. They don't mind a brawl and they tend to get in them often because they don't have great defense. They cut easily. Their faces always look like they've lost...even when they've won.
- Mexican fighters are usually high activity fighters and try to wear opponents down and there is absolutely no quit in them. They tend to go to the body often because as I say, they like to wear guys down. They love a brawl and are constantly coming forward.
- Americans are often counter punchers and tend to be more strategic in their bouts. They often have better defense and use a lot of head movement. More "boxer" than "brawler".
- African fighters are usually stronger than their opponent and favor power over speed.
- Asian boxers like to get in and get out and they need super-quick footwork and good hand speed to do so. They stay outside until they have an opportunity and then they attack and retreat as soon as they're done.

As far as those don't miss guys:
- Terence Crawford - From Nebraska. Undefeated fighter that currently fights at light-welterweight (135 lbs. to 140 lbs.) Power puncher that switches from orthodox to southpaw.
- GGG - Eastern Euro fighter with more of a Mexican style. Undefeated and knocks everybody out (albeit against weaker competition). Constant onslaught type of fighter. Currently fights at middleweight (154 lbs. to 160 lbs.) and is the #3 P4P fighter in the world.
- Sergey Kovalev - for my money, this is baddest man in the sport. He's just a nasty, sinister type of guy that seems to like punishing people. Eastern Euro fighter is currently ranked #2 P4P. Undefeated but has a controversial draw on his record.
- Chocolatito - Undefeated Central American boxer is recognized as the P4P king right now. Currently fights at flyweight (108 lbs. to 112 lbs.) and knocks everybody out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gteeitup
Heads up - this is going to be tl;dr for most of y'all.

I was pretty excited for that fight. I admit that. But deep down I kind of knew it was going to disappoint. I didn't buy it. I went to a friend's house (a girl who knows more about boxing than anybody else I know). But here's the deal, the more you follow boxing, the more you'll know which fights to make sure to watch and which to leave alone. It's kind of backwards, but a good general rule of thumb is that if a boxer has already made it to the point where his fights are megafights on PPV and they cost a ton, that fight probably isn't worth watching. The best fights are when young, hungry fighters are trying to make a name for themselves and coming up through the ranks. And then there are some guys you just don't want to miss. Stick to the free broadcasts on HBO. They have great coverage and usually the fights are pretty good. Even when one guy is the dominant fighter of his weight class, if you follow boxing enough you'll know when that fighter is fighting a guy who's style could make for a good fight (you know the old adage that "styles make fights" - it's totally true).

Here are some descriptions of fighting styles for guys from different parts of the world. This is just my non-expert opinion but it might help you in determining whether or not you want to see a guy fight:

- Eastern European fighters are usually tough physically but weaker mentally. They have a rigid and methodical style and like holding their hands high - very little fluidity.
- Western Euro fighters love the jab but they usually don't move that well. They don't mind a brawl and they tend to get in them often because they don't have great defense. They cut easily. Their faces always look like they've lost...even when they've won.
- Mexican fighters are usually high activity fighters and try to wear opponents down and there is absolutely no quit in them. They tend to go to the body often because as I say, they like to wear guys down. They love a brawl and are constantly coming forward.
- Americans are often counter punchers and tend to be more strategic in their bouts. They often have better defense and use a lot of head movement. More "boxer" than "brawler".
- African fighters are usually stronger than their opponent and favor power over speed.
- Asian boxers like to get in and get out and they need super-quick footwork and good hand speed to do so. They stay outside until they have an opportunity and then they attack and retreat as soon as they're done.

As far as those don't miss guys:
- Terence Crawford - From Nebraska. Undefeated fighter that currently fights at light-welterweight (135 lbs. to 140 lbs.) Power puncher that switches from orthodox to southpaw.
- GGG - Eastern Euro fighter with more of a Mexican style. Undefeated and knocks everybody out (albeit against weaker competition). Constant onslaught type of fighter. Currently fights at middleweight (154 lbs. to 160 lbs.) and is the #3 P4P fighter in the world.
- Sergey Kovalev - for my money, this is baddest man in the sport. He's just a nasty, sinister type of guy that seems to like punishing people. Eastern Euro fighter is currently ranked #2 P4P. Undefeated but has a controversial draw on his record.
- Chocolatito - Undefeated Central American boxer is recognized as the P4P king right now. Currently fights at flyweight (108 lbs. to 112 lbs.) and knocks everybody out.
3_introvert.gif
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT