The thing that you NEVER hear when discussions of UNC's schedule are occurring is twofold: one, we've beaten 5 consecutive teams that will be in bowls, 3 on the road. Two, re: the oft-repeated bit about UNC having no wins over Top 25 teams; UNC is the PRIMARY REASON for at least two, arguably 3, of those teams not being ranked. Anyone seriously think a 9-3 Pitt team who lost at Iowa and at NDame wouldn't be ranked....how about a 9-3 Miami team that had played UNC, Clemson, and FSU? But alas, we dominated those teams when we played them. So, seriously, we are to be less respected b/c we did damage to other really good teams' seasons? That's such lunacy, and poor analysis of the totality of the circumstances surrounding UNC's entire body of work?
I'd also argue that Dook's season would've been more impressive in the back third of the season but for the frontal lobotomy we performed in them.
I'd also argue that Dook's season would've been more impressive in the back third of the season but for the frontal lobotomy we performed in them.