I love berry and I'm really excited about how theo has played so far and what he brings this team. Id have to say at this time Berry comes off the bench w Marcus Paige returning. Thoughts?
Last edited:
Theo brings too many things to this team including a shut down defender and a toughness quite frankly this team really needs. I love berry but I think Roy will keep theo in the starting lineupBerry is the point guard.
I think berry goes to the bench and MP plays the point, with Theo at the 2
Still waiting for the three words "Shut down defender" to become fact. Lots of love for Theo out there defensively and I too see the potential....I just have not seen the deed yet. I do agree Theo brings a great deal of toughness that this team largely needs. That being said...I have been saying since beginning of last year that I would start Berry and Paige together.Theo brings too many things to this team including a shut down defender and a toughness quite frankly this team really needs. I love berry but I think Roy will keep theo in the starting lineup
Theo can still get 25 min a night coming off the bench.
theo has the quickness and the reach, but usually a lock down defender is a very strong guy who doesn't get pushed around. we'll see...Still waiting for the three words "Shut down defender" to become fact. Lots of love for Theo out there defensively and I too see the potential....I just have not seen the deed yet.....
That would be a mistake of Biblical proportions .I love berry and I'm really excited about how theo has played so far and what he brings this team. Id have to say at this time Berry comes off the bench w Marcus Paige returning. Thoughts?
Bingo.Berry is the only true PG on the team. His development might be the most important single factor in making a title run possible.
Theo's +/- is much as it is because he has played almost all his minutes with Berry. PG is the mission-critical position. Theo has done a credible job filling in, but an eye-test will tell you he's not a natural 2, neither offensively nor defensively. Marcus is our best 2.Well, the +/- number heavily favor Pinson playing and playing at the 2. So the best lineup would probably be Paige, Pinson, Jackson, Brice, and Meeks. I would like to see this with Berry and Hicks logging serious minutes off the bench in more of a seven man rotation. Then Britt and Maye next for a few. Then James and Williams if they need them. This is obviously more for when conference play starts. For now, the minutes need to be spread out for a number of reasons.
I understand the thought that goes into Berry playing the point and I agree there are some good reasons for this as well. It wouldn't bother me at all. In that scenario you obviously just have Pinson logging heavy minutes off the bench. I think those that think it is the only way to go are kind of downplaying the obvious and fairly proven benefits Theo brings.
Edit, see below.Gary.. when do you think Roy will cut down the back court rotation and who do you feel will be left out?
After last season I'm not gonna predict, but I'll tell you what I think Roy should (and hopefully will) do.Gary.. when do you think Roy will cut down the back court rotation and who do you feel will be left out?
Steat, that very well could happen. And yeah, folks who haven't played the position may not realize how much pounding your hands take just from normal PG activities as compared to playing off the ball.. So erring on the side of caution may be wise. I'm sure the doctors' verdict and how practice (and post-practice) goes will say a lot for Tuesday.I'm not going to be disappointed either way, but I will be upset if Paige takes on such a heavy load in his first game back and hurts in hand again. Even if Roy's eventual plan is to start Paige at the 1 (which I don't think is his plan), it makes no sense to give him primary point guard duties right out of the gate against the #2 team in the country.
Perhaps Roy will bring Paige off the bench in his first game back, perhaps coming in for Pinson at the 17-minute mark. Then starts Paige in the next game.
Spot on, Coach. Getting minutes for KW and LM during the pre-ACC games (at least after MD) is big for depth.Pinson is the "Spark" you need coming off the bench. He and Isaiah provide a lot of energy with that 2nd Unit. Roy could now theoretically go with a 1st and 2nd Unit:
1: Joel, Marcus, Justin, Brice, Kennedy
2: Nate, Kenny, Theo, Isaiah, Joel
I would still like to see Kenny get some more minutes in this early part of the season. I think we'll need him at some point. Luke is another energy guy that can help in spots. He's a way more talented version of Simmons. Give this team time. They still haven't practiced as a FULL squad that many times. Remember, Theo was limited in practice the first week or so, then Marcus went down.
Last night would a good step in developing some toughness, both physically and mentally. There's still room for improvement, but they are getting there. The biggest thing is effort and focus for the full 40 minutes.
Theo's +/- is much as it is because he has played almost all his minutes with Berry. PG is the mission-critical position. Theo has done a credible job filling in, but an eye-test will tell you he's not a natural 2, neither offensively nor defensively. Marcus is our best 2.
He has been big but let's be real: our zone offense is predicated on wing entries that only happen with proper PG play. Look at his numbers with Britt competed to those with Berry. Night and Day. That's not a diss on Theo at all unless you want to see it that way.That's pretty disrespectful to Theo's game. Both guys help the +/- numbers of the other. It works both ways. He struggles defending at the 2 for sure but he is a better playmaker than either of our PGs right now. That doesn't mean he could run the offense as well (he isn't a PG) but strictly as a playmaker he is the best on the team at this point. Theo has done a better than credible job filling in and this +/- numbers at the 2 versus the 3 (+78 vs +22) aren't really up for debate. If we move Theo to the 3 we are putting him where many of us thought he would be more successful when that has up to this point proven not to be the case. Marcus is without a doubt our best two but there is no reason to think Theo wouldn't be better for the team at the two with Marcus than at the 3. The same guys would be around him except you would be switching Marcus for Berry. I hope this at least is considered, even if it isn't the way Roy goes. It may not even be the way I would go if I really got down to it but I would have to consider it. I agree we need to see a lot of Berry and Marcus together but it isn't as much of a slam dunk as some think. I get that you really like Berry. I do too. Theo has been pretty big for this team in a lot of ways though.
He has been big but let's be real: our zone offense is predicated on wing entries that only happen with proper PG play. Look at his numbers with Britt competed to those with Berry. Night and Day. That's not a diss on Theo at all unless you want to see it that way.
I love Theo as a player, but him playing pretty much full-time 2 is putting a fish out of water. His best role is as a 3, and for this particular team, our versatile energy guy who can give you minutes at two other positions. That versatility instantly improves our rotation once Marcus goes back to starting.