Why Fedora should pursue the KU job
- Thread starter WoadBlue
- Start date
Then you should assume that if Russell had played for Dook, the Devils would have won at least 9 games per year, and the Raiders would have bet the next decade of the franchise on Russell as a great QB.
It is easy to have really good numbers as a baseball closer if your team has a pair of star starters and a league leading batting average and a first rate late reliever/set up man. It is easy to have awful numbers as a closer when your team has pisspoor coaching and bad starters and below average hitting.
You are amazingly dumb. You just said Elliott would have had ‘many, many more wins’ at Clemson that Bryant. Bryant was 16-2 as a starter at Clemson. He won the acc championship and lost to Bama in the title game.
All I know...If we had Quise as the starting QB on this team we would not be 1-7...
We’d be undefeated. This team has a better offensive line and deeper running backs. Skill position is a push as the TEs are better now but WRs were better in 2015. Defense is better now too.
You mentioned the TE...We have several that are very good but being wasted...Hell let Les Miles son play...Elliott bless his heart is not the answer...
And anybody that thinks Elliott is a better option than Kelly Bryant...Pass that stuff you smoking I need some....
Woad literally just said Elliott would have many, many more wins at Clemson than did Bryant
I know...Woad and me agree on a lot of things but not when it comes to Quise...He is 1 of the best QB to ever play at UNC...
Guys Elliott is awful. Stop the nonsense. He’s a great kid, he grinds and gives us all he’s got but his skill level isn’t where we need it to be at this level to be successful.
Nobody expects to take over a team with a good record. If the coach is being fired then obviously the team is underperforming.
No - Elliott as Clemson QB would have had many more Ws the past 2 years than he has had at UNC, and Bryant at UNC the past 2 years would have had many, many more Ls than he had at Clemson.
Surround an average QB with super talent, and fans with limited discernment will assume the QB is very very good, even great. Surround an average QB with less than superior talent, and top that off with poor coaching, from player development to game planning to play calling, and fans with limited discernment will assume the QB is absolutely terrible.
That’s not what you said. Nice back pedal.
Do you think Elliott is better than Bryant?
Yes, it is.
No. I think they are both average QBs - Bryant high average and Elliott low average.
