Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s going to be Amy Barrett and she will be nominated and confirmed before the election.
I have no idea what the point of those posts were. If you are trying to point out that all politicians are liars and hypocrites, congrats. You have done a brilliant job of stating the obvious.
with intellect like that, maybe you could get a job as @prlyles’s assistant
Don’t be silly. The repubs made it clear in 2016 citing the “Biden rule” that no scotus nominee within 11 months of an election would get voted on. They wanted to make sure “America’s voices were heard” remember? No way they would be so openly hypocritical four years later and vote on a nominee just two months before an election. I mean surely they still want “america’s voices to be heard” Right? Right? Lol
Both sides are now arguing the exact opposite of what they were arguing 4 years ago. Shows all any of them care about is politicking, not what's actual right.Nothing exposes the repubs and the dems blatant hypocrisy and childish partisan bullshit more than a scotus nomination. Just sit back And laugh and watch the sheep on both sides point fingers at the others and claim moral hi ground.
Both sides are now arguing the exact opposite of what they were arguing 4 years ago. Shows all any of them care about is politicking, not what's actual right.
Awwwww your feelings got hurt. Sorry for that.
Yepp and fwiw imo trump should be able to nominate who he wants and have a vote just as Obama should have been able to nominate someone and have them voted on. Either they’re the president or they’re not. Whether there’s only 11 mos or 11 weeks left in their admin.
there are 2 parts to this and only one part is in control of the president. If the Senate doesn’t want to bring the nomination to the floor, they don’t have to do so.
I’m not sure why this is complicated.
but the dems started it.Both sides are now arguing the exact opposite of what they were arguing 4 years ago. Shows all any of them care about is politicking, not what's actual right.
can you send me your address, so I can send you some money? Use it to buy a sense of humor and the several IQ points it takes to recognize the obvious.dude, shut up...you’re a child.
As a new poster I would like to welcome you to the forum. Your username is a lot like a real loser that used to post here but you seem to be every bit as smart as he was.I have no idea what the point of those posts were. If you are trying to point out that all politicians are liars and hypocrites, congrats. You have done a brilliant job of stating the obvious.
with intellect like that, maybe you could get a job as @prlyles’s assistant
you're a new poster? Or are you just semi-literate?As a new poster I would like to welcome you to the forum. Your username is a lot like a real loser that used to post here but you seem to be every bit as smart as he was.
I agree I didn’t word that very well.you're a new poster? Or are you just semi-literate?
They say you're a stock boy at a convenience store. Who'd you have to blow to get that far up the ladder?
They say you're a stock boy at a convenience store. Who'd you have to blow to get that far up the ladder?
Good to see you’ve finally come to terms with your disability.I agree I didn’t word that very well.
As a new poster I would like to welcome you to the forum. Your username is a lot like a real loser that used to post here but you seem to be every bit as smart as he was.
Don’t be silly. The repubs made it clear in 2016 citing the “Biden rule” that no scotus nominee within 11 months of an election would get voted on. They wanted to make sure “America’s voices were heard” remember? No way they would be so openly hypocritical four years later and vote on a nominee just two months before an election. I mean surely they still want “america’s voices to be heard” Right? Right? Lol
At the time that was said it was true but then Mich changed the rules....nice tryBut your girl RBG said, I’m paraphrasing here, “no where in the Constitution does it say a President should stop being President in the last year of his term.” That answer was given when RGB was asked about Obama filling the seat vacated by Scalia.
Should she be replaced by someone willing to go on the record with the same stance on the kneeling? Seems good for continuity of the court.Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Kaepernick protests: 'I think it's dumb and disrespectful'
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, never shy to weigh in on the controversies of the day, said she thinks "it's really dumb" for San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick and others to refuse to stand for the national anthem.www.google.com
Retrospect is my favorite spect.
yes of course, the owner...but is it a chain, and if so how many layers of management did he have to work through to move up from greeter?well the owner of course. Word is he’s a little “light in the loafers”. Nttawwt
But your girl RBG said, I’m paraphrasing here, “no where in the Constitution does it say a President should stop being President in the last year of his term.” That answer was given when RGB was asked about Obama filling the seat vacated by Scalia.
Then she supposedly left “last wishes” of not having her seat filled until after the election. Lol.
They’re all the same. Embrace your hypocrisy. Just vote for the corruption you prefer and be done with it.
But your girl RBG said, I’m paraphrasing here, “no where in the Constitution does it say a President should stop being President in the last year of his term.” That answer was given when RGB was asked about Obama filling the seat vacated by Scalia.
Then she supposedly left “last wishes” of not having her seat filled until after the election. Lol.
They’re all the same. Embrace your hypocrisy. Just vote for the corruption you prefer and be done with it.
You don’t have any idea hat you’re talking about....yes of course, the owner...but is it a chain, and if so how many layers of management did he have to work through to move up from greeter?
"They’re all the same. Embrace your hypocrisy. Just vote for the corruption you prefer and be done with it."
I know. We get it, heelman. What's the end game in continually pointing out the obvious as regards both sides, rather than just picking one poison or the other and taking it like the rest of us.
unfortunately it’s not obvious to most and anyway I like to bitch about it.
So? Your alphabet doesn't even have a 'w'.You don’t have any idea hat you’re talking about....