Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The dookies are playing in El Paso. Or would you have preferred Albuquerque? I flew into Detroit for business for over 6 years and would gladly take it before either of them.Originally posted by WoadBlue:
Worst possible bowl location
Lived in El Paso for a year. Could not pay me to go back.Originally posted by Raising Heel:
The dookies are playing in El Paso. Or would you have preferred Albuquerque? I flew into Detroit for business for over 6 years and would gladly take it before either of them.Originally posted by WoadBlue:
Worst possible bowl location
I will probably DVR it and watch later.Originally posted by Raising Heel:
Thoughts?
I'll second that.Originally posted by uncboy10:
Can we trade the the bowl game for a new DC?
Midwesterners wouldn't give a flip about that. But NYC area people would.Originally posted by RUfinal4:
too bad they don't combine the bowl with hoops. While the UNC men are much better than the Rutgers men it would be great for a rematch of the ladies hoops programs that went to double overtime this past week. They can do it at Auburn Hills the day after the bowl game.
By what measure? I haven't seen a source that placed Rutgers' SOS higher than 46, nor a single one that ranked their SOS higher than UNC's.Originally posted by mahncpa1:
Rutgers had the 18th toughest schedule and UNC had the 35th toughest.
Oh, you want to see bad scheming combined with bad technique? Wait until you see UNC's defense.Originally posted by 80RU:
Rather an extraordinary number of cases of what should have been an intermediate run turning into a home run because of bad scheming combined with bad secondary technique.
I think those may be pre-season numbers. Our OOC looked much tougher pre-season when Washington State, Navy, Tulane were all Bowl teams last year. Navy is the only one to make of those 3 this year so our current SOS doesn't look quite as good. Though, we did win all of our OOC games.Originally posted by Raising Heel:
By what measure? I haven't seen a source that placed Rutgers' SOS higher than 46, nor a single one that ranked their SOS higher than UNC's.Originally posted by mahncpa1:
Rutgers had the 18th toughest schedule and UNC had the 35th toughest.
May not be the best source, but it is a site I follow. See link.Originally posted by Raising Heel:
By what measure? I haven't seen a source that placed Rutgers' SOS higher than 46, nor a single one that ranked their SOS higher than UNC's.Originally posted by mahncpa1:
Rutgers had the 18th toughest schedule and UNC had the 35th toughest.
there are two running threads.....the one you probably looked at mentioned your defensive stats and a lot of fans thoughtOriginally posted by UNC_Blue:
The RU fans on this thread appear to be good representatives of RU.
I would advise UNC fans to not go to their site. 2/3 of the RU fans over there predict an easy win against us, the other 1/3 are just gleefully taking shots about UNC and saying that one of us should have not taken the bowl bid... because UNC is so scummy and RU is so pure.
This post was edited on 12/8 1:01 PM by UNC_Blue
Yep. Already went to their board earlier today....and I regret doing so.Originally posted by UNC_Blue:
The RU fans on this thread appear to be good representatives of RU.
I would advise UNC fans to not go to their site. 2/3 of the RU fans over there predict an easy win against us, the other 1/3 are just gleefully taking shots about UNC and saying that one of us should have not taken the bowl bid... because UNC is so scummy and RU is so pure.
This post was edited on 12/8 1:01 PM by UNC_Blue
I'll try to keep it brief haha.Originally posted by yesrutgers01:
I haven't really followed you guys all that closely but can see you have a good offense and bad defense. Any breakdown you can share as to what you guys think are your strengths and weaknesses?
Ah, okay. Rutgers is definitely an outlier compared to other sites but of course each one uses its own methodology.Originally posted by mahncpa1:
May not be the best source, but it is a site I follow. See link.
yep, lose-lose imo.Originally posted by SeaHawk98:
This is just a waste of time and money. How the hell does a 6-6 team deserve a bowl. And the how the hell are they going to get pumped playing Rutgers in Detroit if they can't get pumped playing State and Kenan. After that embarrassing game, they players absolutely do not deserve a bowl game.
Originally posted by bleeduncblue:
After the season we had, we deserved Detroit and Rutgers.
Well, technically, Rutgers had the VERY FIRST Football Team.Originally posted by jefro6:
Does Rutgers have a football team?