While the "star" rankings don't always translate into results, I thought it was interesting to note the difference of opinions regarding the 2016 UNC class.
- Rivals - UNC at 22nd (3.22 avg ranking per recruit; 7 4* recruits)
- Scout - UNC at 23rd (3.08 avg ranking per recruit; 2 4* recruits)
- ESPN - UNC at 33rd (not an insider to get detailed data)
Anyone understand or care to explain the vast disparity between recruiting service rankings?
- Rivals - UNC at 22nd (3.22 avg ranking per recruit; 7 4* recruits)
- Scout - UNC at 23rd (3.08 avg ranking per recruit; 2 4* recruits)
- ESPN - UNC at 33rd (not an insider to get detailed data)
Anyone understand or care to explain the vast disparity between recruiting service rankings?
