Rather than quoting 15 different poasts, I'll just blanket reply here.
Re: Trout. I want the record to show that at no time did I ever say he wasn't the best player in baseball (he is). I merely said he didn't deserve the 2016 MVP, and he shouldn't win it this year either, because his team did (and probably will) finish below 500 and out of the playoffs. It's not the BPA (Best Player Award) it's the MVP, and it's tough to be considered that valuable to a product that sucks. If you want to give it to Trout every year, rename the award to the BPA.
Re: DH. I agree it takes the strategy out of the game, which is a bummer. But
@tarheel0910 made the case that it's ruining the lower levels, which is backwards. They needed to put the DH in because pitchers' hitting was so terrible, it's not that pitchers hitting is terrible because the DH is now instituted.
Also - they need the DH to give some sort of excitement to the games. I like a pitcher's duel as much as the next guy - but if you're gonna make me sit through 3.5 hour games 162 times a year, I damn well better be seeing someone tear the cover off the ball every once in a while.
Ya, the whole not having enough spots in the outfield for your hitters, and players needing a day off from being in the field every now and then are ancillary benefits - but the reason the DH was (and is) needed is because the product sucks even more when you have someone incapable of batting coming up every 9th hitter. It ruins the flow of the game. And, my point is proven by the fact that they'll be instituting the DH in the NL soon enough, and then after you guys have your year or two of griping about it, you'll say "Wow, this is actually more watchable now"