Tons of news sources reporting on this.
The SI link has a great video :
https://www.si.com/nfl/2017/09/21/aaron-hernandez-brain-cte-video-photos
If they start filing and winning "wrongful death" lawsuits, football may end even faster.
Of the 111 brains that have been examined, 110 have been damaged by CTE. As more show damage and lives are disrupted, it will continue to intensify concern. And, again, if the families start winning wrongful death lawsuits, that will speed up the process.
You'd better prepare for its demise. It's coming sooner or later.
I'm not sure if the condition is what was responsible for any of his behavior. A person makes their own decisions. They're accountable for them, and their actions. However, if this condition can become associated with the actions, in medical opinions and public opinions, then it's just a matter of time before it ends.Don't buy it. Correlation, not causation. In our society, we have a real problem attributing guilt to human beings. It's gun control's fault, or CTE's fault, or racism's fault, et al.
Homeboy was in gangs when he was 15. He was a POS his whole life and it ended up getting him in prison and then dead. The end.
That's a big "if" as well as an even bigger "however," strum.I'm not sure if the condition is what was responsible for any of his behavior. A person makes their own decisions. They're accountable for them, and their actions.
However, if this condition can become associated with the actions, in medical opinions and public opinions, then it's just a matter of time before it ends.
The part I put in bold is the part I'm referencing. Though not as potentially serious as CTE, everyone has factors that can contribute to them committing a crime or committing suicide, be it a broken home, excessive drinking, bullying at school, etc. etc. etc.I'm not sure if the condition is what was responsible for any of his behavior. A person makes their own decisions. They're accountable for them, and their actions. However, if this condition can become associated with the actions, in medical opinions and public opinions, then it's just a matter of time before it ends.
Your being convinced, or not being convinced, isn't going to matter. Unless you're planning to impregnate thousands of women, and they'll all be male offspring with college football level football talent in their genes.The part I put in bold is the part I'm referencing. Though not as potentially serious as CTE, everyone has factors that can contribute to them committing a crime or committing suicide, be it a broken home, excessive drinking, bullying at school, etc. etc. etc.
Like you say, a person makes their own decisions. You cannot convince me for a second that Hernandez carried out calculated murders because he was under some sort of brain fog from CTE.
There was far too much money being made from all manner of activity throughout history that all came to abrupt end once it was regarded as being harmful to society. I'll gladly offer examples.That's a big "if" as well as an even bigger "however," strum.
Thankfully, football isn't going anywhere. There is far too much money and popular support to prevent it.
Go for it.There was far too much money being made from all manner of activity throughout history that all came to abrupt end once it was regarded as being harmful to society. I'll gladly offer examples.
I'm not sure if the condition is what was responsible for any of his behavior. A person makes their own decisions. They're accountable for them, and their actions. However, if this condition can become associated with the actions, in medical opinions and public opinions, then it's just a matter of time before it ends.
Well... I disagree that we're only our brains. But, I understand how the brain can control the body.You DO NOT have agency over your physical brain. There is no "you" that exists independent of your brain. If I tweak your brain in the right way I can make you depressed, angry, or turn you into a serial killer.
I understand that people have doubts about this but read up on the Texas University shooting in the 60's. Charles Whitman wrote in letters that something was wrong with his brain, and that he was losing control. He sought professional help and they turned him away despite his symptoms because they couldn't find anything wrong with him at the time.
He went on to murder his wife and mother before climbing into a clock tower on the university of Texas campus with a rifle. In his suicide letter he requested that his body be donated to science so they could research his brain to find out what was wrong with him. They found a pea sized glyboblastoma (tumor) in exactly the right region of the brain to affect decision making and emotional regulation. It was the perfect explanation for the behavior of an otherwise perfectly normal man.
Well... I disagree that we're only our brains. But, I understand how the brain can control the body.
That's exactly right! Well said. That's a nice little caveat for perpetuity!There is no scientific grounds for assuming there is anything to consciousness that isn't a complex phenomena that emerges from the physical brain and its processes.
That's exactly right! Well said. That's a nice little caveat for perpetuity!
You're using the inevitable end of slavery in America as an illustration for the speculative demise of the National Football League? How absurd.African slavery for openers.
I'm telling you that just because there's a shitload of money being made on it, that doesn't mean that it's going to continue. I'm using an example from history where an obscene amount of money was being made on an activity that became archaic and deemed a danger to society. You can insist that football's ability to produce revenue will overcome the blatantly obvious human cost all you want. It makes no difference to me if you resist it or not. Check back in 10 years. Fewer and fewer boys are playing the game. The roots are dead.You're using the inevitable end of slavery in America as an illustration for the speculative demise of the National Football League? How absurd.
Does he suffer from CTE? I don't wanna get too far off-track of the thread.
The roots are dead? You're out of your freakin' mind.Fewer and fewer boys are playing the game. The roots are dead.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-football-youth-decline-met-20170904-story.htmlThe roots are dead? You're out of your freakin' mind.
Check out the website for the Pop Warner Little Panthers League in the Charlotte metro area. It includes seven age divisions and over 100 teams. The number of participants is in the thousands and this is just one league in one area of the country playing tackle football only. It doesn't include kids who participate in flag football.
You sound like Nuk'LE Head when he proclaims the Hollywood Industrial Complex is dead all because Harvey Weinstein was declared a womanizer.
Does he suffer from CTE? I don't wanna get too far off-track of the thread.
But, seriously... if you can continue to argue, you're never wrong? I was impressed that this guy implies to be superior to a rabbi AND Noam Chomsky! That was definitely an interesting perspective overall. I am sure he believes what he is thinking and saying is absolute truth.
What you don't seem to realize is that the recent increase in concussion protocol cases and targeting penalties is due to rule changes designed to make the game safer, not necessarily an increase in violence on the field.And, every time there is a concussion protocol, or an ejection for targeting, especially in a college game (which happens more and more frequently every week), it will get worse.
I watched it twice. The 2nd time, it made more sense to what you're saying. Initially, I thought he was trying to emphasize how religion is BS, basically.His argument is a case for CTE playing a causal role in a case like this. But also genetics and other various factors. That doesn't absolve him of guilt or responsibility, its just a more sophisticated explanation than saying "Well he was just a bad guy." Of course he was a bad guy, but how did he get that way?
I am pretty certain that he doesn't believe what he is saying is absolute truth. He has degrees in philosophy and neuroscience from Stanford. I'd say its a safe bet that he's well educated on the subject of bias.
I'm not fighting. There's no need to fight about it, unless you're threatened by something. I'm not. I'm simply presenting actual occurrences and making a prediction based on the pattern. I don't care if you agree or disagree. I don't really care if it stays or goes. However, from what I see, it's becoming extinct. If that bothers you, that's a YP, not an MP. Of the two of us, you're obviously far less familiar with what is being discussed, on a clinical level.What you don't seem to realize is that the recent increase in concussion protocol cases and targeting penalties is due to rule changes designed to make the game safer, not necessarily an increase in violence on the field.
It's not that you don't know what it is you're fighting for. It's just you're a lousy fighter.
Hey, I can get on-board with that. If the motivation and innovation can create a skull implant, or something that can be put inside the skull, then it's possible. But, no helmet, the way they work now, will stop the brain from slamming into the skull. All the helmets really do is protect the exterior of the head!Agree with @Heels Noir in this thread. I'm not some "head in the sand" dude who wants to totally dismiss the effects of repeated head trauma. Obviously it ain't good for you.
But the game is not dying like some people seem to think. Football is thriving. And science will catch up. Within 10 years, they will have helmets that completely eliminate concussions. The NFL has teams of scientists working hard on it. When there's a will, there's a way.
Hey, I can get on-board with that. If the motivation and innovation can create a skull implant, or something that can be put inside the skull, then it's possible. But, no helmet, the way they work now, will stop the brain from slamming into the skull. All the helmets really do is protect the exterior of the head!
100% Risk Exposure to Brain Damage
I used Omalu because he discovered the condition and is very familiar with the details.JMO, but you need to quote someone other than Dr. Omalu on this matter. I understand the work that he's done, but he's crossed over from scientist to doomsday preacher.
And yes, helmets now can't do it. But science is amazing. It always progresses. Once upon a time, people only had radio and television was something simply unimaginable to the human mind.
JMO, but you need to quote someone other than Dr. Omalu on this matter. I understand the work that he's done, but he's crossed over from scientist to doomsday preacher.
And yes, helmets now can't do it. But science is amazing. It always progresses. Once upon a time, people only had radio and television was something simply unimaginable to the human mind.
I always wonder what the concussions might have been like in the 1930s with leather helmets.How could any helmet prevent the rapid deceleration of the head when you get hit? No helmet design can prevent the brain from moving inside the skull. That's like saying a car frame could prevent your organs from slamming into your skeleton when you crash a car. No design could do that
If anything going away from helmets to reduce the violence of the impacts would be the best shot. You don't really hear about rugby players getting CTE
How could any helmet prevent the rapid deceleration of the head when you get hit? No helmet design can prevent the brain from moving inside the skull. That's like saying a car frame could prevent your organs from slamming into your skeleton when you crash a car. No design could do that
If anything going away from helmets to reduce the violence of the impacts would be the best shot. You don't really hear about rugby players getting CTE
I always wonder what the concussions might have been like in the 1930s with leather helmets.
If anything going away from helmets to reduce the violence of the impacts would be the best shot. You don't really hear about rugby players getting CTE
I've argued for no helmets for years, including on this board.Correct. The answer to CTE is no helmets, which will not happen for football because it would change the game.
I've argued for no helmets for years, including on this board.