We used to get drunk and play tackle football no shit. I don’t think any of us are ****ed up. No helmets rule.
As @UNC71-00 points out, it won't happen because it would forever change the game.So the world's three foremost experts are in agreement. This problem should wrapped up any day now.
Or just leather helmets like some soccer goalies wear. .
Sure thing, Dr. Morose.Of the two of us, you're obviously far less familiar with what is being discussed, on a clinical level.
Then why does the NFL's Competition Committee even bother?To make it even more clear, this isn't solved, or changed, by attempting to make the game less violent. That won't even be achieved at this point. It's not really a viable option, to be frank.
Not always. Just ask Mack Hollins.And, what you don't seem to realize is; The plays that result in targeting penalties are just the "really severe" examples.
As @UNC71-00 points out, it won't happen because it would forever change the game.
It would also make too many potential viewers squeamish. Football is popular with lots of folks because, besides the gruesome leg injuries, most football injuries can't really be "seen." The head trauma is concealed by a helmet, and blood is usually minimal in the NFL. With no helmets, the intensity of contact injuries would greatly diminish, but the amount of blood would greatly increase. Some of the viewing public wouldn't like that.
No helmets would be fantastic for the game, though. Or just leather helmets like some soccer goalies wear. No one would launch anymore because they'd break their neck.
Where, at any time, did I ever say "abolish the sport?" I never even implied that it should be abolished... not once. I said, over and over, I don't care. I also said it sucks that it's coming to an end. I've enjoyed it my whole life. I love watching it. I played it in jr. high. So... you're making shit up there.it sounds to me like your one and only solution is to abolish the sport immediately.
It's their product and their fortune that is at stake?Then why does the NFL's Competition Committee even bother?
And, those players are suffering from it, too. Mike Webster was playing in 1974. I've seen tons of footage from those eras. They're awesome to watch! I saw Darryl Stingley become paralyzed by Jack Tatum live on TV, as a young boy. What the hell does the severity of those injuries, and the inability to clothesline tackle tackle now, have to do with CTE making the participation in football becoming less and less all the time? We don't have gladiators fighting to the death now either. But, they used to.You're obviously not much of a student of the game, strum. I encourage you check out some game footage from the NFL of the 1960s up through the '90s, before the in-the-grasp rule was created, when clothslining and horse collars were legal, and hitting a defenseless receiver was often strategic.
I'll openly admit, seeing these guys have full-on collisions and then be immobile is amazing to watch. I'm detached from it. I know they train their whole lives to do this stuff. @Heels Noir thinks I want the sport to end. I don't. I just know it's going to end, eventually, because it will finally not be worth the cost.Yep, seems like we're all in complete agreement there. It would change the game in a way that might protect players, but not viewers. And viewers ultimately determine what changes get made.
"If they start filing and winning 'wrongful death' lawsuits, football may end even faster."I never even implied that it should be abolished... not once.
I see a person with bone cancer and I conclude, quite correctly, that "they're not long for this world." Or, "I hope their pain ends soon and they are in peace." Or, "This is inevitably going to result in their death." Or, "That chemo is killing them faster than the cancer.""If they start filing and winning 'wrongful death' lawsuits, football may end even faster."
"You'd better prepare for its demise. It's coming sooner or later."
"It's just a matter of time before it ends."
"This is going to be a memory. I know it sucks. I'm not looking forward to it. But, it's still coming to an end."
"The roots are dead."
"The human anatomy makes the demise inevitable."
"However, from what I see, it's becoming extinct."
No, strum, you never implied the unceremonious end to football as we know it. 'Course not. But there was a moment when you went Frankenstein on us, which was good for a chuckle:
"Unless science can create a skull implant that prevents the human brain from sloshing around inside the skull every time 2 players collide, it's only a matter of time before it's no longer played. Evolution is working against it. It always has been, actually.
"If the motivation and innovation can create a skull implant, or something that can be put inside the skull, then it's possible."
Frankenstein you are not. Some halfwitted charlatan, yes.
Yuppy parents, sure. Go to the Deep South and go to the state of Ohio and see if they stop signing their kids up to play. Nope.The problem with football is that it's not just a concussion issue. Dr. Bennett Omalu has said the real danger of football is related to the repeated hits that players take throughout the game, especially players on the offensive and defensive lines. While each hit isn't dangerous, the volume of those hits can cause severe brain damage over time.
I'm not at a point to say that football will die, but they do have some major issues. It may last long into the future, but with a smaller pool of players as parents encourage their kids to play other sports.
Yuppy parents, sure. Go to the Deep South and go to the state of Ohio and see if they stop signing their kids up to play. Nope.
Almost like how people who live in poverty and ghettos are likely to become criminals and get into drugs, etc.. What other choices are there? A poor black kid who can run like a mad man isn't concerned with brain damage, no. As MWHeels said, you'll get a smaller pool of people who just don't care if they suffer brain damage. We may even have that now. Everyone is aware of this thing now. You're rolling the dice if you're playing college and then pro football.Yuppy parents, sure. Go to the Deep South and go to the state of Ohio and see if they stop signing their kids up to play. Nope.
They play football because they, wait for it... they like it. I know that's a crazy concept. You don't do anything you like even though there's danger attached to it?Almost like how people who live in poverty and ghettos are likely to become criminals and get into drugs, etc.. What other choices are there? A poor black kid who can run like a mad man isn't concerned with brain damage, no. As MWHeels said, you'll get a smaller pool of people who just don't care if they suffer brain damage. We may even have that now. Everyone is aware of this thing now. You're rolling the dice if you're playing college and then pro football.
Oh, I'm sure they LOVE it. I have no doubt. I'd venture to guess that for almost all of the players that came from impoverished families, it was a godsend! That is why it's awesome for those who can take advantage of it! I'm glad they have that as an option, regardless of social station in life.They play football because they, wait for it... they like it. I know that's a crazy concept. You don't do anything you like even though there's danger attached to it?