ADVERTISEMENT

Andrej Stojakovic

We had talent last year, it was just terrible coaching. Playing Drake and Ian at power forward should be a fireable offense. We came back in three games in Hawaii and Hubert decided that small ball was our best lineup. Not a change of pace lineup, but our best lineup. It took him another 20 games to realize it wasn’t. Steve Nash was fired for putting Seth Curry and Kyrie Irving at the three and four. Lastly, Yes we were a bit guard heavy but we should have had a 5 man rotation at the 4 and 5 the entire season. The best bigs that game will play. As a rotation I believe they were serviceable.
They were, if used properly. Look, we all know the physical makeup of the 4-5 rotation was missing a bruiser, but it was deviating from the Carolina system that was the ultimate culprit.

Go back and look at the 1979 team after Mitch and Tommy were gone. Dean was left with a trio of merely servicable Bigs (one of whom was a Stretch), and a tandem of unspectacular PGs --- so his firepower mostly came from the group of MIke O'Koren (having to play the 4 at 6'7), Al Wood, Dudley Bradley (who was a defensive specialist) and John Virgil (off the bench). Yet SOMEHOW, this underwhelming roster on paper finished 23-6 ranked #9, won the ACC and ACCT vs a loaded dook team.

IIRC the only major adjustment Dean made was giving more ball-handling and play-making responsibilty to O'Koren (incl "Chaser" in the Four Corners), but the system carried the day.
 
This thread is 3 pages long and about to go to the 4th page on how much we need Stojak and how bad Hubert is as a coach? I feel like I am out here on an island, all by myself, not worried in the slightest what we do at the 3 spot when there is a gaping hole I could drive a Mack Truck thru at our center position.

I got the freakin memo folks, our back up center pulled a last minute dick move and entered the portal, am I the only one that got that memo? I have 4 guys I can play at the 3 already on our roster, one of them actually has played the 3 at UNC more than Drake had.

I like Veesaar a ton but there are 2 problems here that make a back up center more important. First, Veesar may play more like a 4 than a 5, he likes to step outside at times and that is fine for a 5, but I suspect his best fit is at the 4. The more important aspect is the kid played what 20-25mins a game last season? WE would need to have him play 35mins + if we don't address this problem, that is a strong jump in minutes for a guy that came off the bench last season.

The second concern now is when Veesaar sits, who backs him up? The list of candidates is James Brown, Stevenson, and High? I like what I saw of James last season but I saw nothing that screamed to me this kid should be more than about 5mins a game for us next season, effort was there but not a lot of skill. There is no way I can be comfortable that James will all the sudden add the skill he needs to be a rotation guy. Stevenson played the 3 mostly for bama, see nothing that makes me feel he can even handle the 5 much less for big minutes, I thought we saw enough of thin centers last season, maybe not. Then there is High, what have you seen that says this is a kid you want at the 5 for any amount of time?

Yet everyone is wrapped up with Stojak, a 6'7" kid that didn't shoot 32% last season from 3? Fact is Stojak is a want not a need and we better start getting worried abut filling this huge need Lubin left us with... But their is now this question of money because unless you want us to bring in a Claude or a Will Shaver bench filler that gives us little if any real help it is going to take some money. It will take money like you guys are wanting thrown to Stojak, if we give it to Stojak where exactly do you think the $$$ comes from to fill the huge hole Lubin left us with?

So I am out here on this island wondering what everyone else is thinking and shaking my head...
 
Ageed DS. Give me a decent back up center and I'll feel a little less on the edge of the sill. This Stojawhozit guy doesnt impress me and I think him being in the team he was resulted in his high ppg... But comparatively low fg and 3 %
 
Ageed DS. Give me a decent back up center and I'll feel a little less on the edge of the sill. This Stojawhozit guy doesnt impress me and I think him being in the team he was resulted in his high ppg... But comparatively low fg and 3 %
Portal is confusing because there are a lot of guys that do not have eligibility but a guy that we at least kicked the tires on early portal that is still there is Ante Brzovic, 6'10" 225lbs center played for College of Charleston, very serviceable big man that should not be to expensive but will cost us more now than what we could have got him for earlier in the portal, there is a late tax in play now.
 
Cade Tyson Junior 6' 7", 200 lbs.

Andrej S is 6' 7", 205 lbs.

I mean, it's obvious we're only going after this guy to replace the spot Cade vacated... It wasn't Val's departure that triggered this it, was Cade's. Tea leaves people!

And since Cade was supposed to play 4 last yr during our small ball, I predict this means Andrej is the PF and Caleb is DSouth's secret backup Center. Apparently he's already scarfing merritt's sammies to pack on pounds (Caleb, not DSouth).

Evans/Dixon
Young/Trimble/Denis
Drake/JPowell
Andrej/High
Veesar/Caleb/Jarin

Remaining three spots = a starting PG, a giant shot-blocking rim protector like Dikembe and a ball-handling, sharp-shooting but facilitating creator who can defend, hit FTs and not flop.
 
Ageed DS. Give me a decent back up center and I'll feel a little less on the edge of the sill. This Stojawhozit guy doesnt impress me and I think him being in the team he was resulted in his high ppg... But comparatively low fg and 3 %
Look guys, put the percentages aside, he can flat play, and would IMMEDIATELY be our best offensive weapon as it stands.

Granted, I'm saying that for perspective, not as any sense of optimism.
 
Cade Tyson Junior 6' 7", 200 lbs.

Andrej S is 6' 7", 205 lbs.

I mean, it's obvious we're only going after this guy to replace the spot Cade vacated... It wasn't Val's departure that triggered this it, was Cade's. Tea leaves people!

And since Cade was supposed to play 4 last yr during our small ball, I predict this means Andrej is the PF and Caleb is DSouth's secret backup Center. Apparently he's already scarfing merritt's sammies to pack on pounds (Caleb, not DSouth).

Evans/Dixon
Young/Trimble/Denis
Drake/JPowell
Andrej/High
Veesar/Caleb/Jarin

Remaining three spots = a starting PG, a giant shot-blocking rim protector like Dikembe and a ball-handling, sharp-shooting but facilitating creator who can defend, hit FTs and not flop.
First, you might wanna subtract Drake from your tea leaves...
 
Similarly, I don't necessarily want Hubert gone. It would be a VERY bad look for a legendary program if that occurs.
That is exactly why you don't hire an inexperienced first time coach to a blue blood program. Because when it goes bad there is an emotional attachment to him and the issue of a bad look when your fire him.

If we would have hired anyone when Roy left that wasn't tied to Carolina theres no question we would be hiring a new coach after last season if it played out like Huberts time has.
 
Ageed DS. Give me a decent back up center and I'll feel a little less on the edge of the sill. This Stojawhozit guy doesnt impress me and I think him being in the team he was resulted in his high ppg... But comparatively low fg and 3 %
I'll just do an exercise if this team signs a backup center and that's the end of the roster.

Evans, Trimble, Dixon, Denis, Young are the guards
Powell is the only true wing
Veesaar, Wilson, Stevenson, backup center, Brown, High are the bigs.

Alright, so who on this roster can you book to score 15 per game? Without "if they improve" or "they're going to improve" or any other qualifiers. Who on this roster is a proven scorer who you know will be the late clock option and late game situation number one option?

This team's biggest need right now is a scoring 2 or 3 (Seth can play the other spot). From there you can solve the concern on your bench. This team needs a 30 MPG dude who can score 20 ppg without it being a shock like it would be for virtually everyone on this roster right now.

It doesn't have to be Stojakovic, but they do have a gaping hole. Also, a pretty important role in Hubert's iso-heavy offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary-7
Look guys, put the percentages aside, he can flat play, and would IMMEDIATELY be our best offensive weapon as it stands.

Granted, I'm saying that for perspective, not as any sense of optimism.
But he does not help us at our main area of need. I like the kid as a player, heck, I would have been all about it had we got him before JPow but the timing now just does not work now. Not solely because of JPow but more we now need the $$$ to fill our need for a center. I would be single focused blowing up the phone to see what it will take to get the CoC center Brzovic that we kicked the tires on early and the kid was interested.
 
I'll just do an exercise if this team signs a backup center and that's the end of the roster.

Evans, Trimble, Dixon, Denis, Young are the guards
Powell is the only true wing
Veesaar, Wilson, Stevenson, backup center, Brown, High are the bigs.

Alright, so who on this roster can you book to score 15 per game? Without "if they improve" or "they're going to improve" or any other qualifiers. Who on this roster is a proven scorer who you know will be the late clock option and late game situation number one option?

This team's biggest need right now is a scoring 2 or 3 (Seth can play the other spot). From there you can solve the concern on your bench. This team needs a 30 MPG dude who can score 20 ppg without it being a shock like it would be for virtually everyone on this roster right now.

It doesn't have to be Stojakovic, but they do have a gaping hole. Also, a pretty important role in Hubert's iso-heavy offense.
Nah, we need a 7';4" 285lb guy that ran the 100meters and triple jump that bench presses 500lbs with a cool nic name like Wilt the Stilt? Yeah, all we need is a 20pt scorer that plays 30mins a game and is actually NOT in the next NBA draft that we can afford, yeah, good luck with that.
 
That is exactly why you don't hire an inexperienced first time coach to a blue blood program. Because when it goes bad there is an emotional attachment to him and the issue of a bad look when your fire him.

If we would have hired anyone when Roy left that wasn't tied to Carolina theres no question we would be hiring a new coach after last season if it played out like Huberts time has.
Guess it's a good thing nobody told Kansas that back in 1988.
 
But he does not help us at our main area of need. I like the kid as a player, heck, I would have been all about it had we got him before JPow but the timing now just does not work now. Not solely because of JPow but more we now need the $$$ to fill our need for a center. I would be single focused blowing up the phone to see what it will take to get the CoC center Brzovic that we kicked the tires on early and the kid was interested.
Look, this roster is well, what it is, and part of what "it is" is offensively challenged on the perimeter --- so I'll take a legit scorer there way before looking at any backup 5s.
 
Last edited:
The second concern now is when Veesaar sits, who backs him up? The list of candidates is James Brown, Stevenson, and High? I like what I saw of James last season but I saw nothing that screamed to me this kid should be more than about 5mins a game for us next season, effort was there but not a lot of skill. There is no way I can be comfortable that James will all the sudden add the skill he needs to be a rotation guy. Stevenson played the 3 mostly for bama, see nothing that makes me feel he can even handle the 5 much less for big minutes, I thought we saw enough of thin centers last season, maybe not. Then there is High, what have you seen that says this is a kid you want at the 5 for any amount of time?
I'll post this again. Not a backup center but a co-center.

Both Veesaar and Brzovic can step out. I can easily see twin post passing when they are in together, and a consistent post presence when only one is in. Both great targets for Evans and anyone else who can pass.

 
  • Like
Reactions: kevindow
Guess it's a good thing nobody told Kansas that back in 1988.
True, but I'd say Roy was the exception, not the rule.

As nice a guy as Hubert is, he's not shown the same ability as Roy did back then, and I don't believe at 50+ years he's suddenly going to 'get it'... nor do I think UNC can afford to sit back and wait-and-see if he does.

The honourable thing for him to do at the end of last season would have been to step down.
 
True, but I'd say Roy was the exception, not the rule.

As nice a guy as Hubert is, he's not shown the same ability as Roy did back then, and I don't believe at 50+ years he's suddenly going to 'get it'... nor do I think UNC can afford to sit back and wait-and-see if he does.

The honourable thing for him to do at the end of last season would have been to step down.
Well, Tommy Lloyd has done pretty well at AZ, so I dunno about any "rule" either way.

Granted, Roy was more prepared than Hubert, but that was on the individuals involved. Fact is, all 3 came from excellent mentors. The key difference is Roy and Tommy didn't try to reinvent the wheel.
 
Well, Tommy Lloyd has done pretty well at AZ, so I dunno about any "rule" either way.

Granted, Roy was more prepared than Hubert, but that was on the individuals involved. Fact is, all 3 came from excellent mentors. The key difference is Roy and Tommy didn't try to reinvent the wheel.
Yep, Lloyd has done well at AZ.... and he is, most likely, a coach. Just like Roy was. Just like Hubert isn't.

My point being, some have 'it' and some don't... and from what I've seen, Hubert doesn't. He wants to, he's a nice guy, he played under Dean, he coached under Roy, but he doesn't have 'it'.

Of all the guys sitting on the bench, I reckon Marcus is the most likely to be a 'coach' and that's based purely on how he played and held himself on the court. Sean looks like a potentially high-level assistant, but I always felt Marcus was the born coach. Of course, that doesn't mean I think he should be the HC.... I'd like to see him coaching at a small school, then work up to being considered for UNC....
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mistercvr4
Whoa and back the truck up. There's a difference here. The particular talent the NBA likes is not necessarily better --- it's just sometimes different from what excels in college (and hell, that changes from year to year by whatever friggin fad is in vogue).

Let's get real here: Would you pass off the myriad GREAT college players who never excelled in the NBA as somehow not being great talents? Lord knows, we've had our share. Some never got a fair shot and some were 1st-rounders who were cast off early because someone didn't like their fit.

Would you say JR Reid, Tyler Hansbrough, Tyler Zeller, Justin Jackson, and a cast of many were not real talents because they were outta the league early?... or guys like Joel Berry, Brice Johnson, Kennedy Meeks, Marcus Paige, et al, were somehow not real talents because they didn't find the right pro situation? Because, lemme tell ya, we would kill for any dadgummed one of those guys right about now.

Sorry to go off, but that premise is insanely flawed and TBH just sounds like an attempt to dull the pain from a VERY REAL and significant loss of talent we just experienced, and brother, sorry, there is NO getting around that fact.
JR, Tyler, Tyler, and Justin all got their chance in the NBA. They all made a roster in the NBA. They all exhibited "dynamic talent" that you referenced. The others former players above that you mention were all very good college level players as well. Thus you changed your original point which stated that UNC had indeed lost dynamic talent this Spring. At this time, I disagree. Good day...
 
Last edited:
Yep, Lloyd has done well at AZ.... and he is, most likely, a coach. Just like Roy was. Just like Hubert isn't.

My point being, some have 'it' and some don't... and from what I've seen, Hubert doesn't. He wants to, he's a nice guy, he played under Dean, he coached under Roy, but he doesn't have 'it'.

Of all the guys sitting on the bench, I reckon Marcus is the most likely to be a 'coach' and that's based purely on how he played and held himself on the court. Sean looks like a potentially high-level assistant, but I always felt Marcus was the born coach. Of course, that doesn't mean I think he should be the HC.... I'd like to see him coaching at a small school, then work up to being considered for UNC....
Actually, you are not alone in that sentiment about Marcus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ozheelfan
JR, Tyler, Tyler, and Justin all got their chance in the NBA. They all made a roster in the NBA. They all exhibited "dynamic talent" that you referenced. The others former player above that you mention were all very good college level players as well. Thus you changed your original point which stated that UNC had indeed lost dynamic talent this Spring. At this time, I disagree. Good day...
Every one of them were dynamic talents.
But hey, maybe we should have just let Joel and Kennedy walk in 16, huh? We didn't need that extra Natty.

And "disagree" with what exactly? I didn't "change" a damned thing. If you wanna try to whitewash a staff repelling three legit 5* McD AAs to make yourself feel better, well... that's up to you. But don't try to sell me that nonsense. I know better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oak ridger
According to Illinois "insiders," Illinois has offered Stojakovic $3 million and he accepted. But his agent wants to give UNC and Florida the opportunity to counter offer.
 
According to Illinois "insiders," Illinois has offered Stojakovic $3 million and he accepted. But his agent wants to give UNC and Florida the opportunity to counter offer.
College basketball payouts must be in the 10's of billions of dollars. It is great for the players (agents) that deserve the cash but for the fans it a shame.
 
Yep, Lloyd has done well at AZ.... and he is, most likely, a coach. Just like Roy was. Just like Hubert isn't.

My point being, some have 'it' and some don't... and from what I've seen, Hubert doesn't. He wants to, he's a nice guy, he played under Dean, he coached under Roy, but he doesn't have 'it'.

Of all the guys sitting on the bench, I reckon Marcus is the most likely to be a 'coach' and that's based purely on how he played and held himself on the court. Sean looks like a potentially high-level assistant, but I always felt Marcus was the born coach. Of course, that doesn't mean I think he should be the HC.... I'd like to see him coaching at a small school, then work up to being considered for UNC....
Oz, the real problem with Hubert is that he has either been convinced by someone or come to his own conclusion that this myth of "position-less basketball" is valid. Hopefully that changed late this season when he FINALLY put power forward in the power forward position, well kind of at least. He at least put a power forward body out there, yet he didn't change his offensive approach, he still stationed that power forward in the deep corner and expected him to jump shoot deep corner treys. JWit hit some of those treys late but we all know JWit was very streaky, he can hit some but when he goes cold it is a artic blast.

It is one thing to allow your 4 or 5 to step outside and take the occasional trey, I am all for that, in fact if anything I would have liked to see more of that, especially with Jalen. But that does not mean go set up camp outside the 3pt arch, it means go set a screen out of movement and pop out at times, roll off the screen at other times but work out of a motion offense.

I think Hubert got baited in to some of this, that first season he was head coach. Recall, he lost Garcia and Ant during the season leaving him with basically only the often injured Puff as he bench. This forced him in to iron 5 mode. Manek, as one of his iron 5 was in particular good at hitting those deep corner treys, Manek doing so was a major cog that got us in to the title game. Hubert saw the value of that, adopted that as a feature for his offensive approach. Problem is that was a special skill that Manek had, not one every power forward can pull off. Yet Hubert tries to plug guys like Leaky, Nance, Ingram,J Wit, and Drake in to that role, heading more and more to the 4 around 1 offensive approach. It worked some games when those guys were on but far to many times they were not.

The 4 around 1 is in itself fine to go to as a change up in a game when you have a guy that can consistently splash it but it is a awful basic approach, it is a gimmick, like a change up in baseball, it better not be your primary pitch. Just because you may be able to get away with it more in the NBA does not mean you can in college, college teams can not trot the levels of talent the NBA has on every team. I heard over and over how Tyson scorched the nets in practice, yeah well you don't have game pressure in practice. Manek was blessed with exceptional shot prep, very quick trigger, and strong confidence few big men can match.
 
JR, Tyler, Tyler, and Justin all got their chance in the NBA. They all made a roster in the NBA. They all exhibited "dynamic talent" that you referenced. The others former players above that you mention were all very good college level players as well. Thus you changed your original point which stated that UNC had indeed lost dynamic talent this Spring. At this time, I disagree. Good day...
Folks get hung up on this word "talent", what colleges get for the most part is raw talent, talent that has to be developed, talent that needs skills refined. When they get to the NBA that talent is well on the way to completely developed. In other words colleges get players that play closer to their floor than ceiling, the NBA gets and develops them to play closer to their ceiling than their floor. The NBA throws all those resources at a kid, they have all the time in the world to exclusively focus on basketball and not have to worry about class grades in sociology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dtodd4475
Folks get hung up on this word "talent", what colleges get for the most part is raw talent, talent that has to be developed, talent that needs skills refined. When they get to the NBA that talent is well on the way to completely developed. In other words colleges get players that play closer to their floor than ceiling, the NBA gets and develops them to play closer to their ceiling than their floor. The NBA throws all those resources at a kid, they have all the time in the world to exclusively focus on basketball and not have to worry about class grades in sociology.
Agreed, there are levels to this. A kid maxed out at a level win games. He/she steps up, not always that much. You better develop in the Association, they all are working on their game yearly. That is one reason the NBA wants these kids young, to actually develop them for the top level of competition. Europe has done it for years, tiers for developing talented youngsters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSouthr
Guess it's a good thing nobody told Kansas that back in 1988.
Maybe I should have said hire a first time coach with playing coaching and went to the school to stop the emotional attachment.

So you statement is apples to oranges to our situation, Roy didn't play for Kansas, hadn't coached at Kansas and didn't go to Kansas.

And a little reminder in Roy's first 8 seasons at Kansas he finished 6th (on probation) then 2nd, 1st, 1st, 1st. 3rd, 1st, 1st with 2 final fours, and Elite 8, and 2 sweet 16's and didn't lose double digit game except for the first year on probation.

Im not sure we need to compare resume between Roy and Hubert, it's not even close.
 
Maybe I should have said hire a first time coach with playing coaching and went to the school to stop the emotional attachment.

So you statement is apples to oranges to our situation, Roy didn't play for Kansas, hadn't coached at Kansas and didn't go to Kansas.

And a little reminder in Roy's first 8 seasons at Kansas he finished 6th (on probation) then 2nd, 1st, 1st, 1st. 3rd, 1st, 1st with 2 final fours, and Elite 8, and 2 sweet 16's and didn't lose double digit game except for the first year on probation.

Im not sure we need to compare resume between Roy and Hubert, it's not even close.
Hubert been on the bubble 3 of the 4 years he has been head coach….Like you said no comparison between him and Roy…
 
Maybe I should have said hire a first time coach with playing coaching and went to the school to stop the emotional attachment.

So you statement is apples to oranges to our situation, Roy didn't play for Kansas, hadn't coached at Kansas and didn't go to Kansas.

And a little reminder in Roy's first 8 seasons at Kansas he finished 6th (on probation) then 2nd, 1st, 1st, 1st. 3rd, 1st, 1st with 2 final fours, and Elite 8, and 2 sweet 16's and didn't lose double digit game except for the first year on probation.

Im not sure we need to compare resume between Roy and Hubert, it's not even close.
How was it not close before thay got HC jobs at blue-bloods?

Look, let's just cut to the chase, shall we? Everyone here knows full well your real objection to Hubert getting the job was never about "experience" --- you just couldn't stand the idea that we were hiring in the family (as mind-boggling as that position is).
 
Maybe I should have said hire a first time coach with playing coaching and went to the school to stop the emotional attachment.

So you statement is apples to oranges to our situation, Roy didn't play for Kansas, hadn't coached at Kansas and didn't go to Kansas.

And a little reminder in Roy's first 8 seasons at Kansas he finished 6th (on probation) then 2nd, 1st, 1st, 1st. 3rd, 1st, 1st with 2 final fours, and Elite 8, and 2 sweet 16's and didn't lose double digit game except for the first year on probation.

Im not sure we need to compare resume between Roy and Hubert, it's not even close.
I used the argument 5yrs ago when Hubert was hired that we needed a more experienced seasoned head coach, that was 100% true 5yrs ago, UNC should not have to put a head coach thru an OJT program. I mean my gosh just look at the rookie growing pains we have had to go thru with Hubert, the program nor the fans should have had to go thru that.

However, these are not normal times we find ourselves in in any aspect of life but certainly true for college sports with the explosive growth of the portal and NIL The old school coaches are getting out of this craziness, Roy was smart to get out when he did. IN no small way all coaches are flying by the seat of their pants now, everything is completely backwards from anything that makes sense, up is now down?

So yes, the experience factor is still a valid argument, just not as valid now as it was 5yrs ago. Once Dean initially built his roster he would bring in recruiting classes, usually 3 man class to replace the leaving seniors. But he was able to develop depth by drilling them so many times as under classmen and by their Jr season they were ready to step up and take over. Now you can't do that, that guy you finally have ready to step in and produce jumps to the portal looking for his sack while his former team stays in annual re-build mode. Dean nor Roy had to deal with that at any time in their careers, especially early on when they were themselves having to develop in to head coaches.
 
Oz, the real problem with Hubert is that he has either been convinced by someone or come to his own conclusion that this myth of "position-less basketball" is valid. Hopefully that changed late this season when he FINALLY put power forward in the power forward position, well kind of at least. He at least put a power forward body out there, yet he didn't change his offensive approach, he still stationed that power forward in the deep corner and expected him to jump shoot deep corner treys. JWit hit some of those treys late but we all know JWit was very streaky, he can hit some but when he goes cold it is a artic blast.

It is one thing to allow your 4 or 5 to step outside and take the occasional trey, I am all for that, in fact if anything I would have liked to see more of that, especially with Jalen. But that does not mean go set up camp outside the 3pt arch, it means go set a screen out of movement and pop out at times, roll off the screen at other times but work out of a motion offense.

I think Hubert got baited in to some of this, that first season he was head coach. Recall, he lost Garcia and Ant during the season leaving him with basically only the often injured Puff as he bench. This forced him in to iron 5 mode. Manek, as one of his iron 5 was in particular good at hitting those deep corner treys, Manek doing so was a major cog that got us in to the title game. Hubert saw the value of that, adopted that as a feature for his offensive approach. Problem is that was a special skill that Manek had, not one every power forward can pull off. Yet Hubert tries to plug guys like Leaky, Nance, Ingram,J Wit, and Drake in to that role, heading more and more to the 4 around 1 offensive approach. It worked some games when those guys were on but far to many times they were not.

The 4 around 1 is in itself fine to go to as a change up in a game when you have a guy that can consistently splash it but it is a awful basic approach, it is a gimmick, like a change up in baseball, it better not be your primary pitch. Just because you may be able to get away with it more in the NBA does not mean you can in college, college teams can not trot the levels of talent the NBA has on every team. I heard over and over how Tyson scorched the nets in practice, yeah well you don't have game pressure in practice. Manek was blessed with exceptional shot prep, very quick trigger, and strong confidence few big men can match.
I agree with you Dave, and I believe this comes back to two key factors:
1. Hubert is not a ‘natural’ coach. He doesn’t have the innate ability to identify issues and make changes as a coach - he’s a TV presenter.
2. UNC does not have the time for Hubert to develop as a coach, enough to offset his lack of natural coaching flair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: notashelbyfan
Is NIL considered income for the players?

If so, do the have to pay income tax in each state they play like professional players?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT