ADVERTISEMENT

Beast Mode

gunslingerdick

Hall of Famer
Feb 16, 2006
40,463
30,028
113
is done.

CaqOSfGVIAAaQS0.jpg:large


Marshawn Lynch is football. His style is what football is all about. I didn't always love his antics but dude was real. he just wanted to smack people in the mouth and didn't care for all the trivial discussion about it. I can appreciate that. Anyway, congrats to Beast Mode on a short, but impressive career.

And this is still one of the top 5 best individual efforts I've ever seen in football.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Raising Heel
I read earlier this morning that Marshawn banked the entire $49 million of his contract and then proceeded to live off only his endorsement money.
I guess he knows he doesn't have to work the rest of his life and with the brain injury stuff so front and center at the moment, who could blame the guy for saying 'see-ya' . .

IMO, I'd guess that there are more pro football players that may be thinking along the same lines . . its a violent sport that can destroy mental health.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Raising Heel
IMO, I'd guess that there are more pro football players that may be thinking along the same lines . . its a violent sport that can destroy mental health.

Megatron looks to be getting out after just 9 seasons as well. I have a ton of respect for guys that come in, kick ass and know when to say, "I've had enough". Barry Sanders, Jim Brown, Gale Sayers, Troy Aikman and Kurt Warner are all guys that retired while still close to their prime.
 
Absolutely. I'm so tired of the hot takes after every single game, in every single sport.

I agree. But on the flip side, these dudes make a lot of money. And their paychecks are somewhat based on their marketability. So while the media is nauseating with their stupid questions, they're just trying to deliver what most fans want. And because pro athletes are leveraging that into large payouts, they owe it to at least go through the motions with the media.
 
I agree. But on the flip side, these dudes make a lot of money. And their paychecks are somewhat based on their marketability. So while the media is nauseating with their stupid questions, they're just trying to deliver what most fans want. And because pro athletes are leveraging that into large payouts, they owe it to at least go through the motions with the media.

The NFL's retirement rate isn't too shabby either . .
 
You knew he was done when he decided not to travel with the team to Minnesota. He just "showed up" for the next one against Carolina, and if you look at his carries...after the 1st quarter, he was essentially benched.
 
I'm just wondering if this CTE thing is the beginning-of-the-end, sooner rather than later.
 
I'm just wondering if this CTE thing is the beginning-of-the-end, sooner rather than later.
At the risk of sounding like an old school "hard ass" I think the whole CTE thing is overblown. You mean a sport that has frequent violent collisions can scramble your brains a little bit?! Damn, who woulda thunk it?
 
At the risk of sounding like an old school "hard ass" I think the whole CTE thing is overblown. You mean a sport that has frequent violent collisions can scramble your brains a little bit?! Damn, who woulda thunk it?
I'm not surprised by the condition at all. I'm just curious what it's going to mean for the future of the sport.
 
I'm not surprised by the condition at all. I'm just curious what it's going to mean for the future of the sport.
Like every other issue that starts to dominate discussion, this is something the media has blown out of proportion. Contrary to how the media talks about it, CTE doesn't turn you into a roid-raging lunatic who will either kill someone or kill themselves. It has done that in rare circumstances, but it's not a given by any means. A lot of correlation not causation being reported as fact by the media on this.
 
Like every other issue that starts to dominate discussion, this is something the media has blown out of proportion. Contrary to how the media talks about it, CTE doesn't turn you into a roid-raging lunatic who will either kill someone or kill themselves. It has done that in rare circumstances, but it's not a given by any means. A lot of correlation not causation being reported as fact by the media on this.


Perception is everything, especially to a business like the NFL that makes over a billion dollars in revenue every year. What you say might be true - I don't know because I'm not a doctor and haven't studied the head trauma thing all that much. But regardless, the word is out. Pop Warner leagues are already seeing a significant decrease in kids playing. High schools are scrapping football programs. Families of higher education and income levels are jumping ship and the sport will soon be dominated by kids from disadvantaged backgrounds. And then liberals will get involved and say that the white man is secretly plotting to hold down young blacks by forcing them towards a sport that kills their mind.

Football is dying....sadly. About a year ago I questioned whether the NFL would still be around in 25 years. Nothing has made me rethink that sentiment.
 
I used to see youth league football at the local recreation complex. That stopped about two years ago. They all play soccer now. If it stops at the root- younger kids- then it will kill the sport at the higher levels. It may take a while, but it's a matter of time now.

I saw where there was some new design for a football helmet. It's far more technologically advanced, but the brain still sloshes around in the skull. The harder they hit, the worse it will get, and has gotten. I heard someone say that, basically, in 100 years people will look back on this sport and think "What in the hell were they thinking?" Kinda like how we look at leeching today. Leeching was not a sport, of course. Was it?
 
Didnt he have a torn ab muscle or something? Something like that would be terrible to recuperate from the way he plays. Dont blame him one bit.
 
Wanna make football 10x safer? Take away helmets or go back to soft helmets with no facemask.

Football is an interesting case study because of how the structure of the game fosters lack of sympathy for the individual. What I mean is, football has 11 players on the field, not 5 like basketball. Furthermore, there's 53 guys on an active game roster (more in college obviously) so the concept of individuality is lost. Johnny Wide Receiver shatters his knee, and we don't really care that much. Next man up. Contrast this to basketball where if someone tears their ACL on the court, we intensely sympathize as if his family has been murdered. On top of this, the helmet further masks the individual and contributes to fans caring about the team, not the individual. We cannot see football player's faces so most fans cannot feel the type of compassion for a specific player like we can in basketball or baseball or soccer. The NFL is a hyper-successful league in terms of popularity and its popularity has next to nothing to do with star power. NFL is the only league that can completely overcome any team's star player getting injured (possibly QB's excluded) and not take even the slightest ratings hit.

Extrapolating this out, it's my opinion that subconsciously, fans are much, much more comfortable watching a player get internal injuries (i.e. concussions) with helmets with facemasks than we would be watching them get their faces bloodied up if they were sans facemask with a soft helmet. I really think that. Seeing a player with no facemask -- being able to have an unobstructed view of the pain and anguish on his bloody face -- would shatter the paradigm of viewing football players as plug-and-play cogs in a wheel that is the team; suddenly the players would become real people with real pain. In other words, even though the injuries would be much less severe and life-threatening with no helmets / soft helmets (broken nose or gashed up face vs massive concussion and head trauma), fans are more comfortable seeing mega hits that cause "invisible" damage to players.

People act like they're all concerned about concussions and the long-term effects of head shots, but fan/media actions say otherwise. If people were REALLY concerned, they'd call for a return to soft helmets. The modern football helmet is a weapon. Players would not lead with their head with a soft helmet. They couldn't -- they'd break their neck and die right then and there. It would take a generation, but re-introducing softer helmets would make the game much, much safer.
 
Last edited:
Wanna make football 10x safer? Take away helmets or go back to soft helmets with no facemask.

Football is an interesting case study because of how the structure of the game fosters lack of sympathy for the individual. What I mean is, football has 11 players on the field, not 5 like basketball. Furthermore, there's 53 guys on an active game roster (more in college obviously) so the concept of individuality is lost. Johnny Wide Receiver shatters his knee, and we don't really care that much. Next man up. Contrast this to basketball where if someone tears their ACL on the court, we intensely sympathize as if his family has been murdered. On top of this, the helmet further masks the individual and contributes to fans caring about the team, not the individual. We cannot see football player's faces so most fans cannot feel the type of compassion for a specific player like we can in basketball or baseball or soccer. The NFL is a hyper-successful league in terms of popularity and its popularity has next to nothing to do with star power. NFL is the only league that can completely overcome any team's star player getting injured (possibly QB's excluded) and not take even the slightest ratings hit.

Extrapolating this out, it's my opinion that subconsciously, fans are much, much more comfortable watching a player get internal injuries (i.e. concussions) with helmets with facemasks than we would be watching them get their faces bloodied up if they were sans facemask with a soft helmet. I really think that. Seeing a player with no facemask -- being able to have an unobstructed view of the pain and anguish on his bloody face -- would shatter the paradigm of viewing football players as plug-and-play cogs in a wheel that is the team; suddenly the players would become real people with real pain. In other words, even though the injuries would be much less severe and life-threatening with no helmets / soft helmets (broken nose or gashed up face vs massive concussion and head trauma), fans are more comfortable seeing mega hits that cause "invisible" damage to players.

People act like they're all concerned about concussions and the long-term effects of head shots, but fan/media actions say otherwise. If people were REALLY concerned, they'd call for a return to soft helmets. The modern football helmet is a weapon. Players would not lead with their head with a soft helmet. They couldn't -- they'd break their neck and die right then and there. It would take a generation, but re-introducing softer helmets would make the game much, much safer.


 
I think everyone missed Raising Heel admit he likes to turn into a sissy sounding, somewhere between black and white, warm milk, boy loving, zombie who can pop and lock like no other.

Or maybe I had a concussion when I read thato_O:):cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: UNC71-00
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT