HD's misuse of players via PT and screwy offensive/defensive schemes this past season (or 2) is causing and will continue to cause potential incoming players to second guess both the brand, program and coach. I commented about this 2 seasons ago when HD kept pulling EC before halfs and during critical game learning opportunities in deference to RJ and again last season when EC was clearly not being given the so called "keys" again in favor of RJ and and a stupid offensive scheme and now the chickens are coming home to roost and UNC had a ton of talent fly the coop this year for likely similar reasons. jmoReally .....
First JPowell is considered to be a + defender according to many experts including David Sisk and AJ. Very interesting that you say what JPow can't do, considering he was a freshman last season. As for your retort about Drake, I didn't equate Drake to JPow, I simply gave their production numbers, sorry they did not turn out like you may have wanted.Jonathan Powell is not considered a strong defender. He is considered a solid defender who may become a strong defender in time. He also can't do anything on offense except shoot 3s. He doesn't have the length or athleticism of Drake Powell, who was able to defend power forwards much bigger than himself.
It's really disingenuous to try and say they are similar players because they had similar stats.
My #1 priority is a 5 to back up Veesaar and I am not really concerned with the other needs so many feel desperate for. Give me that back up 5 and I am perfectly happy to go in to the season. I think I like our freshman class far more than most seem to, have watched a good bit of Denis as of late, kid is 6'5" and in some respects shows some Ian Jackson game, he is yet another guy that could get in to the rotation at the 3. But the Dixon kid, really love the smoothness to his game, kid can sizzles the nets with that shooting stroke, I think he is better than most seem to realize, he is transitioning to the PG position.What i actually believe is Long, wing scorer should be #1 and backup 5 should be a close #2. I also don't see why that is so controversial. Isn't it obvious that a long, wing scorer will be in greater demand and thus harder to find than a backup at any position? I think we can find a backup 5 after a little patience, but have to jump on long, wings with alacrity! I do think we will be fine with finding someone (including going smaller in spots) to get V his rest. BUT another thing peeps have been screaming is why can't we shoot? BTW: what happened to the idea that back to the basket centers were anachronistic? How many teams are fielding multiple beefmasters anymore? Could some combo of CW, JS, High, and JB give us a few minutes in spots, I think so. I love our 2 deep to this point and think we are 1-2 peeps from being perfect. Fland +wing OR Fland + Big would each be fine, but I'd rather get Wing + Big!
Could 2 things be true? And fans only differ on order or priority?
The only thing I know for sure is our staff is doing a masterful job! (I also know peeps are going to only focus on some trumped-up negative minutia and ride it all season!)
I will be first to say the combination of Cadeau and RJ just didn't not mix, just as the combo of RJ and Caleb did not mix. Me, I am just not a huge fan of any player that takes a lot of bad shots and In my view RJ did that for the last 2 seasons. When I say that folks come back with he had to because no one else seemed able to. But why did RJ have to, was it maybe because they wasted so much time pounding the floor boards and not moving the defense? It read to me like RJ wanted to play in half court, why else would he end so many primary and secondary break ops? Yet on the other hand Cadeau wanted to run no matter what. That is the set up for a basic conflict on the court, not being in sync.HD's misuse of players via PT and screwy offensive/defensive schemes this past season (or 2) is causing and will continue to cause potential incoming players to second guess both the brand, program and coach. I commented about this 2 seasons ago when HD kept pulling EC before halfs and during critical game learning opportunities in deference to RJ and again last season when EC was clearly not being given the so called "keys" again in favor of RJ and and a stupid offensive scheme and now the chickens are coming home to roost and UNC had a ton of talent fly the coop this year for likely similar reasons. jmo
My gosh, we have Seth, Dixon, Denis, and even Evans, all combo guards, why bring in yet another combo guard? Let me define combo guard, at least in the way I define one, it is a 2 guard that can play the point in a pinch. Cadeau was a point guard, not in any way a combo. Yes, Evans is in my view a combo that I think is tilted a touch more as a PG but still a combo.Well, that's what you'd get in Fland --- a more dynamic Evans.
So then you do not like UNC Basketball (Because of HD).! Nice...HD's misuse of players via PT and screwy offensive/defensive schemes this past season (or 2) is causing and will continue to cause potential incoming players to second guess both the brand, program and coach. I commented about this 2 seasons ago when HD kept pulling EC before halfs and during critical game learning opportunities in deference to RJ and again last season when EC was clearly not being given the so called "keys" again in favor of RJ and and a stupid offensive scheme and now the chickens are coming home to roost and UNC had a ton of talent fly the coop this year for likely similar reasons. jmo
A combo guard is defined by both size and handle. Also, a true combo guard can shoot the basketball pretty well from behind the arc. In order to play the off-guard position size is required for defensive purposes. Also must be able to bring the ball up as well as get the team into an offensive set when the break is not available. Make no mistake, any good guard is going to push the tempo whenever possible. Thereby the team that he is pushing the ball against does not get to set their defense and contest otherwise open shot attempts. Evans is indeed a PG who can play the 2. Seth is a defensive minded presence who can shoot the ball at times. His handle is decent. To me Dixon will eventually play the PG position. I simply am not certain that will occur this coming season. However, he can shoot the ball and he will play, imo...My gosh, we have Seth, Dixon, Denis, and even Evans, all combo guards, why bring in yet another combo guard? Let me define combo guard, at least in the way I define one, it is a 2 guard that can play the point in a pinch. Cadeau was a point guard, not in any way a combo. Yes, Evans is in my view a combo that I think is tilted a touch more as a PG but still a combo.
When I look at who had and is available in the portal the only PGs I preferred over Evans was Dent and Lee. Out side of those 2 the rest there wasn't a lot of separation with, we got Evans, cool, I will roll with him. That means I am willing to go in to next season without a guy that breaks the presses with his dribble and doesn't need some help getting the ball past half court. Go ahead and plan on giving him help advancing the ball when he needs it, you can do that with Seth or Dixon as well when needed.
GMAFB .. I see you failed the comprehension part of the reading course. At no time did I say or infer "I do not like UNC Basketball (Because of HD)." Go troll someone else.So then you do not like UNC Basketball (Because of HD).! Nice...
You absolutely Implied that you do not like that way that UNC played this past season because of the way HD coaches the game. Therefore, you do not like UNC Basketball at the present time because of the way HD coaches. Also junior, one can only "infer" something as the subject matter relates to themselves. You are not a future journalist for SI, in my view...GMAFB .. I see you failed the comprehension part of the reading course. At no time did I say or infer "I do not like UNC Basketball (Because of HD)." Go troll someone else.
Welp, you had me til the last sentence, and while that was probably the case with RJ. good Lord, that could NOT be further from the truth with EC. What I've told y'all about that situation was not speculation, and the ripple effect cleaned out what would've been our starting perimeter, so here we are. End of story.I can agree that every other player on last season's team has an argument that they were poorly used EXCEPT RJ and Cadeau, they BOTH were given every op imaginable to produce great and In my view to much that it stiffed out the others on the court.
Right now, with all of the Euro-3s we're in on --- the guys from Germany, Spain and Montenegro, respectively --- there is stiff competition, much of which is coming from within Europe.I'd love to land Luka. He's putting up big scoring numbers overseas. He shoots well from 3. He'll be 22 years old in September.
This is a third grade take. How about I disliked what I saw on the court BECAUSE I like UNC Basketball, which has been absent far too often under HD. If you want to cheerlead no matter what that is your business but sometimes grownups have real talk about issues that they see on a forum.So then you do not like UNC Basketball (Because of HD).! Nice...
Lotsa observations there --- you ain't wrong about the poor hands, lack of off-ball movement, etc.At the beginning of last year UNC staff stated they wanted to run, to be one of the fastest teams on the court. That didn't work out and the "scheme" changed. I wondered at the time if Cadeau and RJ were getting beat to a pulp and didn't get to the foul line changed it. I also wondered about injuries. Cadeau passed to the paint early and often and the post players couldn't catch the ball or weren't "ready" to get the ball and after 2 or three turnovers the ball didn't go to the paint nearly as much. Later in the season the team got better at this especially Cadeau to Lubin but the hole was already large in the win loss column. Add to that Cade couldn't and then didn't shoot, RJ had a slump, Withers was good and then not so much ( he did get better later). Jackson could shoot but got lost on defense alot, matchups were unkind to Cade and Washington. Tremble got a concussion that stunted his play and Washington was spotty in execusion. A short back court and the lack of a true center put UNC at a disadvantage. Often times last year Rj was the only one moving without the ball. Cadeau eventually would pass the ball to RJ for a shot. My impression is that as long as Hubert Davis has been coach he has been plugging holes in the dike. NIL and the transfer portal have disrupted any long term meshing for teams. It has also aggravated the "me first" mentality of how do I get to the NBA. I will interested in how the upcoming team moves , with and without the ball. And whether the 4 out/5 out scheme is used.
So then, you are claiming to be some sort of grown-up.? Great. You should be at this point in life, one would think. Coach Davis is under contract until 2030 I do believe. He is not going anywhere soon. That much is Certain. Your take is message board fodder at its minimal level thought process to me. However, that is certainly just me. I will say that it is somewhat Impossible to hate Coach Davis and then claim to love UNC Basketball. You need to be a bit more grown-up in your response to see this point clearly it would seem. Your agenda is however, crystal clear to me. You are wanting Coach Davis to either do it your way and/or leave. I get it. Simple enough...This is a third grade take. How about I disliked what I saw on the court BECAUSE I like UNC Basketball, which has been absent far too often under HD. If you want to cheerlead no matter what that is your business but sometimes grownups have real talk about issues that they see on a forum.
RJ has no argument that he was misused because he had carte blanche his entire 4rth and 5th season (which in my opinion killed team chemistry). EC was not given the opportunity to excel because the dumb ass offensive scheme the UNC coaching staff used last season would likely stifle the jet himself because he would not have been the default primary ball handler Some of you guys, not necessarily you, don't realize the damage last seasons misuse of players did short term but you damn well may see it for the next couple years. HD and his coaching staff may well fit in to that FAFO category. This could get ugly but I truly hope not. jmoI can agree that every other player on last season's team has an argument that they were poorly used EXCEPT RJ and Cadeau, they BOTH were given every op imaginable to produce great and In my view to much that it stiffed out the others on the court.
Perhaps @RP12 wants to see things done not necessarily "his" way, but in a manner that has a track-record of success here.So then, you are claiming to be some sort of grown-up.? Great. You should be at this point in life, one would think. Coach Davis is under contract until 2030 I do believe. He is not going anywhere soon. That much is Certain. Your take is message board fodder at its minimal level thought process to me. However, that is certainly just me. I will say that it is somewhat Impossible to hate Coach Davis and then claim to love UNC Basketball. You need to be a bit more grown-up in your response to see this point clearly it would seem. Your agenda is however, crystal clear to me. You are wanting Coach Davis to either do it your way and/or leave. I get it. Simple enough...
I saw JPowell as a wing backup, before Drake left. Now he has to be considered as a possible SF starter, or SF backup, and also maybe SG backupMy #1 priority is a 5 to back up Veesaar and I am not really concerned with the other needs so many feel desperate for. Give me that back up 5 and I am perfectly happy to go in to the season. I think I like our freshman class far more than most seem to, have watched a good bit of Denis as of late, kid is 6'5" and in some respects shows some Ian Jackson game, he is yet another guy that could get in to the rotation at the 3. But the Dixon kid, really love the smoothness to his game, kid can sizzles the nets with that shooting stroke, I think he is better than most seem to realize, he is transitioning to the PG position.
I simply cannot place a lot of trust right now in either High or James brown and I in no way want to see Jarin spend any time at the 5 for us. Jarin is a 4 that played the 3 all last season for Nate Oates and actually showed the ability to defend 3s, something I never saw in him coming out of high school. I don't want him at the 3 for us but it is nice to know that he can switch off to a 3 and still hold his own. I will say this yet again, my starting 3 for next season would very likely be Caleb Wilson. Folks now days seem to believe the only type of 3 they want is a converted guard, need I remind folks the name of the position is small forward not big guard. Kid became a 5 star due to his ability to facilitate at 6'9". Guys like Jarin and Caleb are guys that will carves teams up from the mid range (Veesaar as well), guys that give us positional mismatches and if you saw duke last season you realize how important that can be.
My 2 areas of concern, clearly a back up at the 5 is my strong #1 but a ball handling PG would be my next most concerned area. I like Evan clearly more than most, telling you I see a bit of a Marcus Paige like game in him, not equating him to Marcus, just saying i see some flashes that remind me of Marcus. I find the expectations on these kids to be really low but maybe that is not such a bad thing, it is far better than those crazy high expectations we had for some of the over hyped guys we have had over the last few years.
Jarin !I saw JPowell as a wing backup, before Drake left. Now he has to be considered as a possible SF starter, or SF backup, and also maybe SG backup
I see Stevenson as possible SF starter, or SF backup, and also PF backup. Maybe C backup, too, if needed there.
So my question is: who starts at SF - JPowell or Stevenson?
Oh dear LordI saw JPowell as a wing backup, before Drake left. Now he has to be considered as a possible SF starter, or SF backup, and also maybe SG backup
I see Stevenson as possible SF starter, or SF backup, and also PF backup. Maybe C backup, too, if needed there.
So my question is: who starts at SF - JPowell or Stevenson?
It’s hard to be optimistic when the common denominator is still on the sideline.lol who knows what we need any more. We’ve wasted so many 5 and 4 star recruits’ potential the last few years that I’ve completely lost confidence that even the greatest recruiting/transfer class of all time would get us past the first weekend of the ncaa.
Meaning...?Oh dear Lord
LOL, so I have 3 answers for your question.I saw JPowell as a wing backup, before Drake left. Now he has to be considered as a possible SF starter, or SF backup, and also maybe SG backup
I see Stevenson as possible SF starter, or SF backup, and also PF backup. Maybe C backup, too, if needed there.
So my question is: who starts at SF - JPowell or Stevenson?
I know exactly what we need, it isn't so much a who, it is a what!~lol who knows what we need any more. We’ve wasted so many 5 and 4 star recruits’ potential the last few years that I’ve completely lost confidence that even the greatest recruiting/transfer class of all time would get us past the first weekend of the ncaa.
Some freakin way come hell or high water I am going to find a way to be optimistic! LOLIt’s hard to be optimistic when the common denominator is still on the sideline.
First really have to get dreams of Watkins out of your head, he isn't playing for UNC. But I as well want to make you aware of a tactic that is being widely used out there and suggest that Tanner is not above using this tactic. Let's say you are Tanner and you have caught wind that duke is highly interested in Stojak (just as example). Now you know you can't afford him and you may even question how he would fit the guys you already have. You could put in a bid for the player for no other reason than to run his price tag up. That way if duke gets him they have to pay more than he is worth but you may force them out due to the price tag, you just have to be smart enough to know when you have to get out or bring him in for a visit and have it not go well so that it looks like the kid backed away from you when in fact you could not take him to begin with. It is a tactic that is being used, has Tanner used it, well ya know...LOLI heard Jamir Watkins from Florida St may be an option. Leading scorer last year at the 3 spot.
I want to say this VERY VERY clearly, nothing I want more for UNC basketball than Hubert Davis have a great season next season and prove to us all that Roy was right in making him the guy to succeed him. There is a great deal of difference between what I want to see happen and what I expect to see happen.Perhaps @RP12 wants to see things done not necessarily "his" way, but in a manner that has a track-record of success here.
You want to see Hubert succeed. I feel confident the vast majority of the folks here want that as well ---- I know I do.
My critiques here have been as much out of frustration FOR Hubert as from anger at the clusterf*** we have been witnessing.
Reality is, extension or no extension, if he lays another egg this season it will likely be his last. That is NOT what I want to happen.
Sure as hell wouldn't be Stevenson.Meaning...?
Who would you incline to start at SF, of the guys we currently have?
Look, it probably won't matter on our end. His representation is not favorably inclined toward UNC at this juncture.I wonder how long Watkins will wait before making a final draft decision.
If I remember correctly, you are strongly against starting Wilson at SF. So unless we get another SF, that leaves . . . Powell? Trimble?Sure as hell wouldn't be Stevenson.
No.Is UNC done in the portal? Duke, Va and GT all pick up players this past week.