I agree Bradley was a necessary cog in this last team. It is no disrespect on Tony. It's just how my mind works. I will think first of Meeks, Berry, Jackson, Theo, Luke, Nate and others who have been here longer. I can't even remember the name of the other tall skinny dude who was 1 and done (or was it 2 and done?) at UNC. Was it Brandon something or other?
It just boggles my mind that these kids go to school with a plan and then everything changes when some random idiot with an agenda gets in their ear.
Me too. When I think Carolina Basketball, Stilman and his 6 years and Ginyard with his 5 are forefront in my mind. Eventually down the list after hitting the 4 year guys like Desmond Hubert, I get to the 3 year guys like Jamison, Carter, and Jordan. And I'm certainly lucky if I even remember to list the 2 year guys like Barnes, Wallace, and Stackhouse.
I would like Tony to return for another year and become one of those players I remember fondly years from now.I completely agree. I like Marvin and BWright just fine. Marvin was a big piece of a championship team. BW was less noteworthy but still brought some excitement. But they will never have the same place in my heart that 3 and 4 year guys do. I got to watch the 3 and 4 year guys grow and mature. I saw interviews and read stories about them throughout their time. I got to see their heartfelt message when they spoke on Senior Night. Conventional wisdom leads one to believe that a deeper affinity can be formed through time. Marvin and BW didn't allow for that to happen. I'm not mad at them. They did what they needed to do. Good for them. They just don't mean as much to me as the guys that stayed longer. And if I'm being completely honest, it's weird to me that not everyone see it that way.
That does indeed boggle my mind. But what boggles it more is that the plan in many circumstances is to "get the hell out of there as fast as I can." It's mindboggling and sad. It's sad that people don't value education and it's sad that people don't value the college experience. But whatever...it's their life.
Oh c'mon...don't be ridiculous. That's an inflammatory poast. Of course the impact that each player had on the team factors into how they were viewed. I don't have any Dewey Burke posters on my wall. But you know that's not the point Soap and I are making.
I like Tony Bradley and if he leaves, I'll be happy for him that he reached the NBA. But IMO, he'd be a better player and a better person by staying at least one more year. And when it comes down to it, I simply won't remember much about Tony. He played well early and then fell off substantially. But can anyone point to his impact? When was his big game? Did he hit a timely shot? Did he pull a Luke Maye and dive on the floor for a loose ball scramble to help seal a win in the NCAA tournament? Basically, what I'm asking is this: if you had to make a "Tony Bradley - UNC Highlights" video, how long would it be and what would you put in it?
You're following the wrong sport if you really believe that.
You're following the wrong sport if you really believe that.
Its ironic, few of us said before the season that Tony could be OAD. A lot of posters disagree, or said they wouldn't care what he did if UNC win the title. The irony.
He does, and they do. In fact there was a video breakdown earlier this season on a draft site and they referenced him outplaying every NBA prospect PG he came up against.His February slump hurted him some. NBA scouts knows he a NBA player. Also if you look at this tape, he perform as well or better then any NBA prospect guard he has faced this season.
That's what insurance policies are for. Tony's gonna get paid, now or later, but there's a big difference between lottery and late first-round. As Andrew put it in the front page article, "NBA teams protect the deeper investments".Can't think of a Carolina player who was injured and because of that injury never made it to the NBA
Can't think of any other players outside of UNC either, but I'm sure there have been some.
With all that being said, if I was a guaranteed 1st round pick....SEE YA!
Simply can't take the risk.
So here's where I don't get the double standard. Someone points out that Britt has a bad game, and it makes them a doom-and-gloomer and maybe even a closet dookie, but here you go suggesting that we wouldn't have had a problem winning it all without Tony, which in my opinion is a much bigger "bash" on someone who worked hard and contributed all year.
Yes. Even worse than a bash in my opinion.its flat out ignorant and insulting to Bradley for one.. and me for two as hes suggesting I am watching the wrong sport. This leads to another interesting query- The person telling me that our only first round big man wasnt needed to secure a title is the one saying Im watching the wrong sport-it really probably begs some self reflection on his part about what he thinks he knows about the game of basketball.
would love to hear what you're hearing, bleed... feel free to elaborate.Y'all may end up being correct but that's still not what i'm hearing, DIRECTLY from team personnel.
The Carolina jersey must be akin to Superman's cape. For some poasters on here as long as a kid has a Carolina jersey on (or the potential to put it on) - he's God's gift to Earth. But as soon as he picks another collegiate jersey to wear, or goes for an NBA jersey at his first opportunity - he was never anything special anyways.
The Carolina jersey must be akin to Superman's cape. For some poasters on here as long as a kid has a Carolina jersey on (or the potential to put it on) - he's God's gift to Earth. But as soon as he picks another collegiate jersey to wear, or goes for an NBA jersey at his first opportunity - he was never anything special anyways.
Coaches think it's 50/50 on Bradley. A couple of the other players say he'll come back IF he's not guaranteed to be a LOTTERY pick (not necessarily just first round). Which obviously he SHOULD stay in the draft if he's told that.would love to hear what you're hearing, bleed... feel free to elaborate.
I like the way you talk.Coaches think it's 50/50 on Bradley. A couple of the other players say he'll come back IF he's not guaranteed to be a LOTTERY pick (not necessarily just first round). Which obviously he SHOULD stay in the draft if he's told that.
All involved believe Berry and Pinson will be back unless something crazy happens in the next 3 weeks.
That is exactly how Bradley SHOULD approach it, and that has been Roy's traditional advice approach in cases like this. Unfortunately that's not the "advice" TB's camp is getting in FL, which likely explains the 50/50 from the coaches.Coaches think it's 50/50 on Bradley. A couple of the other players say he'll come back IF he's not guaranteed to be a LOTTERY pick (not necessarily just first round). Which obviously he SHOULD stay in the draft if he's told that.
All involved believe Berry and Pinson will be back unless something crazy happens in the next 3 weeks.
Analysts claimed Rabb would be a top 10 pick because he stayed a 2nd year, that doesn't seem to be the case this year.
Looks to be the same type of talk with Bradley.
I wish I could like this more than once.Coaches think it's 50/50 on Bradley. A couple of the other players say he'll come back IF he's not guaranteed to be a LOTTERY pick (not necessarily just first round). Which obviously he SHOULD stay in the draft if he's told that.
All involved believe Berry and Pinson will be back unless something crazy happens in the next 3 weeks.
That sounds accurate. Is that not how you look at it?... as long as a kid has a Carolina jersey on (or the potential to put it on) - he's God's gift to Earth. But as soon as he picks another collegiate jersey to wear, or goes for an NBA jersey at his first opportunity - he was never anything special anyways.
Great post, gun. Pretty much sums up my feelings. I wish nothing but the best for all UNC players, regardless of how long they're at UNC. But I enjoy watching them mature into young men and develop their games. I have more special memories of those who stay longer so they mean a little more to me.I completely agree. I like Marvin and BWright just fine. Marvin was a big piece of a championship team. BW was less noteworthy but still brought some excitement. But they will never have the same place in my heart that 3 and 4 year guys do. I got to watch the 3 and 4 year guys grow and mature. I saw interviews and read stories about them throughout their time. I got to see their heartfelt message when they spoke on Senior Night. Conventional wisdom leads one to believe that a deeper affinity can be formed through time. Marvin and BW didn't allow for that to happen. I'm not mad at them. They did what they needed to do. Good for them. They just don't mean as much to me as the guys that stayed longer. And if I'm being completely honest, it's weird to me that not everyone see it that way.
That does indeed boggle my mind. But what boggles it more is that the plan in many circumstances is to "get the hell out of there as fast as I can." It's mindboggling and sad. It's sad that people don't value education and it's sad that people don't value the college experience. But whatever...it's their life.
Oh c'mon...don't be ridiculous. That's an inflammatory poast. Of course the impact that each player had on the team factors into how they were viewed. I don't have any Dewey Burke posters on my wall. But you know that's not the point Soap and I are making.
I like Tony Bradley and if he leaves, I'll be happy for him that he reached the NBA. But IMO, he'd be a better player and a better person by staying at least one more year. And when it comes down to it, I simply won't remember much about Tony. He played well early and then fell off substantially. But can anyone point to his impact? When was his big game? Did he hit a timely shot? Did he pull a Luke Maye and dive on the floor for a loose ball scramble to help seal a win in the NCAA tournament? Basically, what I'm asking is this: if you had to make a "Tony Bradley - UNC Highlights" video, how long would it be and what would you put in it?
I was one of the ones who said Tony could possibly be OAD. Actually, there were more than a few saying this. Bottom line is this. If you had taken a poll in the preseason and asked posters if they would take a title even if it meant losing Tony/Joel/Theo/JJ, as well as the seniors, 99% of us would have said "yes". And rightfully so, I would question the sanity of the 1% who voted "no". So people should chill out and stop worrying about it. We'll know what we have back within a month.How quickly we forget..Crickets!
Exactly. Look, if he can get drafted in the first round and wants to go, he should go. If he's projected as a second round pick, I think it would behoove him to return and have a very good chance of becoming a lottery pick the following draft. But it's his life and his choice. He's represented the university well and I wish him the best regardless.Well if Tony goes and hires an agent , then all those who have been wishing for a OAD should be happy.
If you aren't lottery, come back. Get an insurance policy for good measure.
The question that Team Bradley needs to ask themselves is do you want to simply get into the league or do you want longevity. It could benefit Bradley to come back for his second year and continue to develop some of those skills that could keep him in the league for a long time. IMO he's no Marvin Williams or Wright at this same stage. Close but...