The thing that bugs me the most is that the league has not come out and said the ref blew it, like they did after the dook game. ours was much more clear that it was a bad call
WHO has anything like our ACCCG call, in all of college football, this year? I don't see that as pro-CU or anti-UNC; I see it as pro-protect the ACC's CFP hopeful.Yea but heres the thing, and after this u can have last word and we'll put it to rest, EVERY SINGLE FAN BASE has a story like our acccg. They ALL claim the refs screwed them over as some sort of pro-their rival or anti-their team conspiracy. So who's right?
Reminds me of Terry Porter, the guy who threw the flag after a count of ten, in the Fiesta Bowl that cost us the NC in 2002. Never could find a pic of Tressel giving him a bag of money.
You guys were robbed!
Nailed it. The official w/ a bias only needs a clearing to invoke his bias.the agenda doesn't have to be communicated from the conference office to the official. it's abundantly clear that having a team in the playoffs will help the conference and only UNC fans will be disappointed in a clemson win. so an official with a personality flaw who likes to influence the outcome of a game (a la ron cherry) can do so knowing he won't lose his job or be reprimanded. it's not a conspiracy. it's a license to steal.
the agenda doesn't have to be communicated from the conference office to the official. it's abundantly clear that having a team in the playoffs will help the conference and only UNC fans will be disappointed in a clemson win. so an official with a personality flaw who likes to influence the outcome of a game (a la ron cherry) can do so knowing he won't lose his job or be reprimanded. it's not a conspiracy. it's a license to steal.
Nailed it. The official w/ a bias only needs a clearing to invoke his bias.
i said he would NOT lose his job or be reprimanded for throwing the flag. i never intimated that he would lose his job or be reprimanded for not throwing it. please read more carefully before calling someone's thinking "absurd."C'mon. Why in the world would the ref lose his job or be reprimanded for not throwing a flag when no flag should have been thrown at all on an uncommunicated screw job?? That line of thought is absurd, Jimmy.
i said he would NOT lose his job or be reprimanded for throwing the flag. i never intimated that he would lose his job or be reprimanded for not throwing it. please read more carefully before calling someone's thinking "absurd."
i accept your apology and look forward to your future comments.I misread it and I apologize. I'm the dumbass here. My bad. However, I feel better for being wrong because I've always enjoyed reading what you post.