Right. He's obviously invincible. Wouldn't even need the secret service to protect him.I'm good with Keith. We know he has the stamina for it.
Mocking the political process is the way to my heart. That looked disturbing. Too much Thai stick, maybe.
I dunno.... is it really worse than making fun of someone with a disability???? I don't think so. You still lose! haha
You would think he would be trying to portray himself as the most normal of the 3 candidates but that was very odd.
Normal is subjective. But, that looked like he was going for the most abnormal candidate. Time-and-place-for-everything doesn't appear to be in his wheelhouse. Adios, Mr. Johnson.You would think he would be trying to portray himself as the most normal of the 3 candidates but that was very odd.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxn...deos-could-back-him-up.amp.html?client=safari
Of course, your bias won't allow you to believe this.
I'll just say now that I am not voting but I do hope Trump wins. It will be an interesting four years lol
Ahem...I rest my case.
He's an idiot.
That's not a high bar to jump. It's like saying you're healthier than a dead person.Oh come on, don't exaggerate. Is he a bit flimsy? Yes, but he's not an idiot. He's still far better than the other 2 fools we have as options.
Why stop there? Why not vote for him and help ensure it's interesting.
From what I have seen, the Clinton side is more concerned about sidelining Johnson.Oh come on, don't exaggerate. Is he a bit flimsy? Yes, but he's not an idiot. He's still far better than the other 2 fools we have as options.
From what I have seen, the Clinton side is more concerned about sidelining Johnson.
I'm not talking about commercials or attack ads. That would look desperate. I'm talking about their media mouthpieces. I don't watch TV news, but from the inundation I get from uber-liberal friends online, MSNBC and lefty media are the ones that go after Johnson. I don't see or hear Fox & Company bothering with any 3rd party people.No way. How many commercials have you seen from the Dems attacking Johnson? I haven't seen one, but they've certainly saturated the airwaves with anti-Trump spots.
I'm not talking about commercials or attack ads. That would look desperate. I'm talking about their media mouthpieces. I don't watch TV news, but from the inundation I get from uber-liberal friends online, MSNBC and lefty media are the ones that go after Johnson. I don't see or hear Fox & Company bothering with any 3rd party people.
If a 5-10% bloc falls for one 3rd party candidate, it will probably pull from Hillary and she needs all the help she can get. It shows just how BAD a candidate the Democrats have when they're neck-and-neck with a charlatan like Trump.
That's not a high bar to jump. It's like saying you're healthier than a dead person.
Would Johnson take away more votes from Hillary or Trump?
By the same token you could say just how bad of a candidate the Republicans chose if they're still behind a Democratic candidate as unpopular and untrustworthy as Hillary.
Dern shame in this once Great Country that those are the best we can come up with. :-(
And, really, the American governmental/political system is a thing of beauty. The system has preserved for itself a can't-lose self-preservation outcome. It is completely rigged to deny ANY competition. There is NO OTHER voice or party besides the two in-place. That's done on purpose. So, any politician that gets into the system has it made... for life. On top of that, the politicians are never accountable to their constituency. They can't be held accountable... there's no other option or alternative. Every corporate entity knows that all they need to do is pay their admissions and work it as hard or soft as they want to get the desired outcome.They aren't the best we can come up. They're just the best money can buy.