True but it kinda hurts less this yr since i baked in some excuses around all the spring practice we missed. These young guys need more time with Hess tooThis has been a disappointing season all the way around. We had the opportunity to go into this game undefeated as probably the #3 ranked team in the country. And if the offense doesn't s*it the bed then we could have won it.
Shoulda/coulda/woulda is the unofficial mantra of Carolina football.
True but it kinda hurts less this yr since i baked in some excuses around all the spring practice we missed. These young guys need more time with Hess too
Many others also got zero spring days and less summer S&C time, but I'm ignoring that and sleeping better.
You mean they haven't recruited offensive replacements?Hurts more when you remember that our superstar QB will be gone after next year, and most of our offensive skills players have an opportunity to go pro after this year. The young defensive talent is showing up just in time for the offense to have to be replaced.
You mean they haven't recruited offensive replacements?
Exactly. The lack of football knowledge on this board is glaring at times. You can have the best skill players in the world but if your OL can’t protect the QB and open holes for the backs, you can’t beat a top five team. The game is won in the trenches.Our skill guys are great but games like tonight exposed our OL big time.
Hurts more when you remember that our superstar QB will be gone after next year, and most of our offensive skills players have an opportunity to go pro after this year. The young defensive talent is showing up just in time for the offense to have to be replaced.
No there are some young guys who should be good. But it's always a crap shoot, especially at QB. Criswell has supposedly looked really good in practice, and Drake Maye is supposed to be really good too. But at some point you're gonna have an unproven QB in there, and same goes for RB once Carter and Javonte are gone. Ruder is a sophomore, so he'll still have three years of eligibility after this year. Some experience guiding the transition to the next young guy could be helpful if he sticks around.
Fortunately some of the young receivers are already getting some quality reps this year without losing a year of eligibility.
But Longo is still a terrible play caller.
Not worried at all. Khafre, Simmons, Rose, Downs, Blackwell, JJ Jones, Paysour at WR. Boykins, Hood and Edmonds at RB. Maye & Criswell at QB. Entire OL are underclassmen with Pounds, Sutton coming in. Pinder, Murphy, Bingley Jones, Ritzie, Silver, Stevenson on the DL. Asante, RaRa, Power, Evans, West at LB. Stevens, Conley, Grimes, Sinclair, Duck and Nash in the secondary. Phew, that is about 21 4* kids just right there that will be playing significant roles for the Heels the next 3-4 years. Future is bright!
So, the consensus is that Bateman is a better DC than Longo is an OC?The future looks bright, but it's probably going to take one of those QB's at least a year to really settle in and play their best football. So we're probably looking at a minimum of three years before this program is really ready to make a major step forward. There's just not much chance that we're ready to win the ACC next year unless a majority of our skills guys on offense come back, or Sam plays a 4th season.
But even if that happens, we still have a terrible offensive coordinator that doesn't know how to make adjustments once a defense figures out what he is doing. We can't beat the likes of Clemson or Notre Dame with often horrendous play calling.
DB development hasn't even been remotely decent since Dre was a player at Carolina. O line development has been about the same. If those things don't turn around then it won't matter how many four star players Mack recruit.
So, the consensus is that Bateman is a better DC than Longo is an OC?
The future looks bright, but it's probably going to take one of those QB's at least a year to really settle in and play their best football. So we're probably looking at a minimum of three years before this program is really ready to make a major step forward. There's just not much chance that we're ready to win the ACC next year unless a majority of our skills guys on offense come back, or Sam plays a 4th season.
But even if that happens, we still have a terrible offensive coordinator that doesn't know how to make adjustments once a defense figures out what he is doing. We can't beat the likes of Clemson or Notre Dame with often horrendous play calling.
DB development hasn't even been remotely decent since Dre was a player at Carolina. O line development has been about the same. If those things don't turn around then it won't matter how many four star players Mack recruit.
I would say yes, but we aren't winning the ACC with either one of them. I'd give Bateman one more year, but I don't think he's a long term solution.So, the consensus is that Bateman is a better DC than Longo is an OC?
Or they could come in like Sam and not miss a beat, who knows. The thing is to surround the young QB with talent, which they’re certainly doing. It was always going to take the program 3-4 years to really get things going, which is why I question all this talk about being a college playoff team and competing with Clemson and ND....in years 1 & 2. Next year will be Sam’s 3rd year, not 4th and they could absolutely compete for a ACC title both next year and the year after, when Sam goes pro. You’ll have two guys that been in the system 1-3 years and can take the reigns. The o line and secondary are insanely young and they will develop, I have no doubts about it. Hard to cover dudes for 5-10 seconds when your guys up front can’t pressure the QB. And I promise you, Silver, Ritzie, Bingley Jones, Pinder, Murphy, Evans and company will be bringing the heat. Year 2, lotta ball game left.
I would say yes, but we aren't winning the ACC with either one of them. I'd give Bateman one more year, but I don't think he's a long term solution.
Sure, but how often does that happen. Bateman was supposed to be that guy, but I don't see it. I was skeptical when he was hired. Everyone kept saying he would be great because of the Oklahoma game. One game doesn't make a great coach. Same thing will happen this year. We've been average at best on D this year. ND was the exception to the rule, but I bet a lot of people will bring this game up all the time in the off-season. Unless it continues in the Miami game and possible bowl game, it's an outlier to me.What Carolina really needs is a couple of breakthrough offensive and defensive minds at the coordinator positions. Guys like Venables can change a program in no time. Especially if they get the kind of talent that Mack is bringing in.
We could also use the second coming of Vince Young.
There is talk about how we could have been in the ACCCG because of how soft our schedule was this year. We were better than FSU and UVA. If we were undefeated going into ND then we wouldn’t even necessarily need to win that game to make the ACCCG.
Sam is eligible for the draft after next year and is very likely to be the first QB taken if he goes pro after his third year. Technically he could play five years but that’s not gonna happen.
Sure, but how often does that happen. Bateman was supposed to be that guy, but I don't see it. I was skeptical when he was hired. Everyone kept saying he would be great because of the Oklahoma game. One game doesn't make a great coach. Same thing will happen this year. We've been average at best on D this year. ND was the exception to the rule, but I bet a lot of people will bring this game up all the time in the off-season. Unless it continues in the Miami game and possible bowl game, it's an outlier to me.
Out D looked good last year by comparison to the Fed years. It wasn't some great D. Personally, I'm tired of hearing about injuries. Been hearing about them for 20 years. You're going to have injuries. A good coach figures it out no matter who gets injuries. But I know, next year, next year, next year, wash, rinse, repeat.I don't understand the view on Bateman with UNC fans. Last year they give up 30 pts in regulation, just twice. The year before, that happened 7 times. Duck, Conley, Kyler have all missed multiple games on the backend and they just don't have the dudes up front this year. You were able to see what he was able to do last year with a healthy Duck, Wolf, Strow, Crawford, Dorn and Ross. Once they get these studs coming in settled on D, you're going to see what Bateman can do. Gotta have the jimmy's and joes to compete. Jimmy and joe's > x's and o's.
Out D looked good last year by comparison to the Fed years. It wasn't some great D. Personally, I'm tired of hearing about injuries. Been hearing about them for 20 years. You're going to have injuries. A good coach figures it out no matter who gets injuries. But I know, next year, next year, next year, wash, rinse, repeat.
There is nothing anybody can do about plays like that. The UNC D was positioned correctly, and nobody after Book screwed up even a little bit. The guy simply made a great play under duress.We didn't do squat in the second, but generally I feel we made ND earn this one. They were better in the trenches but they had to fight for it. They needed shit like this to win comfortably. This was 3rd and long I believe.
There is nothing anybody can do about plays like that. The UNC D was positioned correctly, and nobody after Book screwed up even a little bit. The guy simply made a great play under duress.
That may be the longest completed shovel pass I've ever seen.
Sure, but how often does that happen. Bateman was supposed to be that guy, but I don't see it. I was skeptical when he was hired. Everyone kept saying he would be great because of the Oklahoma game. One game doesn't make a great coach. Same thing will happen this year. We've been average at best on D this year. ND was the exception to the rule, but I bet a lot of people will bring this game up all the time in the off-season. Unless it continues in the Miami game and possible bowl game, it's an outlier to me.
I'm still holding out hope that Bateman is the guy. There have only been a few games where we've looked kinda unprepared schematically or individually. I'm thinking of VT last yr, and some others involving running QB's, though Wake this yr was a head-scratcher.Sure, but how often does that happen. Bateman was supposed to be that guy, but I don't see it. I was skeptical when he was hired. Everyone kept saying he would be great because of the Oklahoma game. One game doesn't make a great coach. Same thing will happen this year. We've been average at best on D this year. ND was the exception to the rule, but I bet a lot of people will bring this game up all the time in the off-season. Unless it continues in the Miami game and possible bowl game, it's an outlier to me.
I'm still holding out hope that Bateman is the guy. There have only been a few games where we've looked kinda unprepared schematically or individually. I'm thinking of VT last yr, and some others involving running QB's, though Wake this yr was a head-scratcher.
But regardless of coach, the X&O's are second to the size, speed, strength of the players in starters and backups. Gotta have talent, and our front isn't very big and is young.
Jahlil is the only true NT sized guy and he doesn't play much. So it feels like we're playing a 4 man front where the interior guys are avg to small in stumpiness while the two "de" are 255 and 245 without having Vic Beasely speed. It is going to be hard to stop the run AND pressure a QB in this scenario unless you are starting 3 Chazz Surratts behind this 4-man front, but instead we're running a nickel page where the nickel is also small (Trey Morrison).
I understand all of that, but I've been hearing it for 20+ years. I'm just tired of hearing the excuses and hearing "just wait till next year." It's been next year for a long time. I guess I'm just really pessimistic at this point.I'm still holding out hope that Bateman is the guy. There have only been a few games where we've looked kinda unprepared schematically or individually. I'm thinking of VT last yr, and some others involving running QB's, though Wake this yr was a head-scratcher.
But regardless of coach, the X&O's are second to the size, speed, strength of the players in starters and backups. Gotta have talent, and our front isn't very big and is young.
Jahlil is the only true NT sized guy and he doesn't play much. So it feels like we're playing a 4 man front where the interior guys are avg to small in stumpiness while the two "de" are 255 and 245 without having Vic Beasely speed. It is going to be hard to stop the run AND pressure a QB in this scenario unless you are starting 3 Chazz Surratts behind this 4-man front, but instead we're running a nickel page where the nickel is also small (Trey Morrison).
I understand all of that, but I've been hearing it for 20+ years. I'm just tired of hearing the excuses and hearing "just wait till next year." It's been next year for a long time. I guess I'm just really pessimistic at this point.
Yeah, yeah. It's always, "but it's different than the other times." I would have more faith if we had beaten a bad UVA team and an absolutely horrible FSU team. But go ahead and tell me why "THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT, WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR."Little bit different when the guy at the helm is a hall of famer and did it once before with UNC. To be honest, we should be thankful the rebuilding is going as fast as it is. Talking about a program that won 5 games in two years, getting throttled by ECU, couldn’t beat State/Duke. Relationships with NC High School coaches were in the dump. Fast forward 2 years — before Saturday, their worse loss in 21 games under the current regime was a whopping 7 points. Which means they’re being competitive and backing up the talk that this program is on the rise and is the place to be. They’re getting a majority of the NC talent sprinkled in with VA, thanks to Bly. This situation isn’t comparable to other, we haven’t seen an influx in talent like this before with the program.
You definitely don't lose multiple games that you should easily win... that's not a sign of anything different.Yeah, yeah. It's always, "but it's different than the other times." I would have more faith if we had beaten a bad UVA team and an absolutely horrible FSU team. But go ahead and tell me why "THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT, WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR."
Yeah, yeah. It's always, "but it's different than the other times." I would have more faith if we had beaten a bad UVA team and an absolutely horrible FSU team. But go ahead and tell me why "THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT, WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR."
You definitely don't lose multiple games that you should easily win... that's not a sign of anything different.
Whiners gonna whine.
Those examples were LAST SEASON! And, we weren't supposed to win those games. So, that analogy isn't correct. I'm talking about THIS season! I said, quite clearly, that you DON'T lose to teams that you're supposed to beat... and, beat decisively... if you're on a clearly-upward trajectory. There is absolutely no excuse for losing to Florida State... none. The UVA game? I'll offer some slack for that because of the QB, and even that wasn't a good enough excuse, truth be told. If we lose to Miami, then the pace of improvement will have us MAYBE in the ACCCG in about 6-7 years.They won games they weren’t supposed to win last year, it happens. You think they should’ve beat SC down multiple scores going into the 4Q with a frosh QB? Or converting the 4th and 17 against Miami? I’m on the bandwagon and will be here when the train gets going, ya’ll can hop on later after you get done bitching.
Those examples were LAST SEASON! And, we weren't supposed to win those games. So, that analogy isn't correct. I'm talking about THIS season! I said, quite clearly, that you DON'T lose to teams that you're supposed to beat... and, beat decisively... if you're on a clearly-upward trajectory. There is absolutely no excuse for losing to Florida State... none. The UVA game? I'll offer some slack for that because of the QB, and even that wasn't a good enough excuse, truth be told. If we lose to Miami, then the pace of improvement will have us MAYBE in the ACCCG in about 6-7 years.
UNC hasn't had a defense that was worth a damn in 22 years. Mack Brown is a good coach. But, his OC & DC are just going to hold him, and the program, back. They aren't the caliber needed to be competitive in this conference.
When I say 6-7 years... I mean that the incremental improvement, year-to-year, will be so slow that it will take that long.My bad, didn’t know I couldn’t bring up the current regime. Tough crowd. Merely bringing up games which you thought you’d lose, and they won! Take the good with the bad, chef! You do lose games you’re supposed to win, when you’re young and inexperienced! Year two!!!!! Just like they win games when they were supposed to lose! You’re gonna get that with a young inexperienced program that isn’t accustomed to winning! Takes longer than two years to build a program! Ask Kelly and Dabo!!! Bateman ain’t the problem dude, you’re gonna have to get off that train. He’s also an elite recruiter. 6-7 years if they lose to Miami! Lol. Y’all are something else, I’m dying.