ADVERTISEMENT

Different Coaches, Different Recruiting Strategies - Offers

What Would Jesus Do?

Hall of Famer
Nov 28, 2010
11,906
6,482
113
I just glanced at the number of offers out from some of the top coaches. Interesting differences. I didn't look at their roster needs, which would obviously be a factor. These are 247 numbers, just because I find it easy to look these things up there.

I assume some of these numbers will change. I also realize many here will disagree with Platek's 206 rating.

Kansas - Bill Self - 37 offers - lowest 3, highest 154

Arizona - Sean Miller - 31 offers - lowest 1, highest 115

Louisville - Rick Pitino - 26 offers - lowest 5, highest 170

Villanova - Jay Wright - 16 offers - lowest 2, highest 179

Kentucky - John Calipari - 15 offers - lowest 1, highest 91

Duke - Mike Krzyzewski - 13 offers - lowest 1, highest 62

MSU - Tom Izzo - 12 offers - lowest 8, highest 88

UNC - Roy Williams - 9 offers - lowest 2, highest 206
 
  • Like
Reactions: shun1
Roy seems to have carried on with the tradition that we don't offer until we have completed a thorough evaluation ourselves. He has adjusted but he apparently did not simply completely scrap our traditions! Many coaches pass out offers like candy and, due to sheer volume, many of them must be based on either professional third-party evaluations or reports from coaches/stakeholders not on their staffs.

I like the idea of volume offers, but I still like it better if the coaches see the kid for themselves! (Couldn't care less about ranking numbers if Roy loves the kid!)
 
SMILE

!!!!!!!!!!!! LOVE MY TAR HEELS & ROY !!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Considering the fact that we really need at least two quality big men, and I think we need three, I'm surprised we have offered more PF/C's. Very surprised. If we don't land at least a couple, we're up the proverbial creek without a paddle. I haven't stressed about recruiting in many years but I have to admit I'm a bit worried that we're not getting more interest from the bigs out there, especially when you consider how much PT is available. I hope it isn't because of a perceived lack of interest on our part. I'm hoping to see a bunch more offers in the near future because our days of being able to selectively pick and choose from the top talent are gone.
 
Watch for the resurgence of those pick and choose days! We have built it and they will come!

Go Tar Heels!
 
Watch for the resurgence of those pick and choose days! We have built it and they will come!

Go Tar Heels!

I know most folks now want to dismiss the NCAA stuff as a issue of the past and that we are now over that hurdle and that is true to an extent. But a very real issue we are dealing with in this 2017 class is that when you typically start making your inroads to a recruit is in their soph and Jr seasons, when they get to their senior season most of the already have a pretty firm impression of where they are most impressed with.

In the 2017 class, we still had the NCAA cloud hanging over us, that stunted our ability to get in early on some of these guys. Great example is Carter, we got way behind on him because he was concerned with the NCAA issues we had. When you are dealing with schools like duke and Ky, it is hard enough to compete with them for a recruit on equal footing but to have to compete with them from way behind is well, double tuff.

There will be some very slight hang over for the 2018 class but by 2019 the NCAA stuff will be totally forgotten and not effect us further. We seem to have a good amount of buzz with the 2018 class already and I am expecting things to be much easier for Roy to get recruits from that class. But we are clearly struggling to get the big men we need from this 2017 class, we have a shot at a couple very good ones we are not the clear leader for any of the guys we fans really dream of from this class.

Now the other issue we have is that we are not seen as the school that really helps these one & done fellas as much as a couple other blue bloods are perceived to. That is just a situation that is going to take us getting one and he be able to clear that one & done pathway.

Not great news I know but is what it is right now. On the better news front, we are seen as a program that does tend to do more with less talent wise and that song does make a better talent guy stop and look, if they can do that with lesser talent, with me they could really be something. In the end all these kids, be they one & done or be they lesser, they all want to play for a winner in college. If we can find our way back to the final 4 again this season, I think we can, our recruiting will explode, this season and how we play is critical!!!

I want to add, it is very critical how duke and Ky play this season as well. I strongly believe Ky will under achieve because IMO their recruiting class is way over hyped (they will win the easy SEC but outside of the easy SEC conference games they are not going to be what folks expect them to be). Now duke, really, with the perception of the talent they have for the coming season, nothing less than a final 4 can be taken as acceptable or expected. That is a lot to expect for a team based on freshmen and while they were able to get that done a couple years ago, a lot fell right for them and you should not bet on being that fortunate all the time. The only way duke can meet the expectations for next season may to win it all but absolutely anything less than a final 4 will be seen as under achieving, that is a ton of pressure for a team that will depend so hard on freshmen to lead them.
 
Last edited:
Those top three in WWJD's list are casting a bait fish net hoping to catch a couple or three kids.
Yeah, Roy doesn't have as many offers out but his are meaningful. He and staff are able to actually get out and see kids during the open periods and so on, not so much if one has offers out to almost 40 kids.
Will we get everyone we would like to get, no. Will we get some good kids that can play, sure.
As we all know, many of the slots will not be filled until spring '17...so hold on for a bit. The kids deserve a chance to see what teams have what players leaving. In our case we have two very big spots inside to fill. Many of the kids we are after already know that 1) we want them and 2) we have PT.
 
1. The NCAA stuff IS OVER!
2. Kentuck and puke smoke and mirrors is starting to tarnish
3. Peeps in the NBA are getting drafted high, but many are not performing from Kentuck and puke.
4. UNC is putting just as many peeps in the NBA
5. Roy has changed his strategy and is casting a wider net( he is not stupid enough to decrease the net!)
6. Peeps are speaking about UNC again with excitement!
7. IT IS EARLY!
 
I was curious if Rick Pitino's high number of offers was a response to Louisville's NCAA woes. But apparently not. Going back several years, he usually has more than 30 offers out there.

One of the things I have wondered about putting out that many offers is if those teams might actually end up with a less talented class. Simply because some of the lower-ranked kids will jump at the chance to play for a top coach at a top school - and the scholarships will get snatched up before higher-ranked players who might have picked that school have made up their minds.

Would good coaches like Pitino and Self be better served to be more selective with their offers?
 
1. The NCAA stuff IS OVER!
2. Kentuck and puke smoke and mirrors is starting to tarnish
3. Peeps in the NBA are getting drafted high, but many are not performing from Kentuck and puke.
4. UNC is putting just as many peeps in the NBA
5. Roy has changed his strategy and is casting a wider net( he is not stupid enough to decrease the net!)
6. Peeps are speaking about UNC again with excitement!
7. IT IS EARLY!
The NCAA thing is like braking on ice. The kids and their parents have been fed negative BS about UNC and Roy for several years - and have heard those negative vibes echoed by too many sports announcers and reporters. Even if they now recognize that it was nonsense, they already have a subconscious negative view. They may logically recognize that UNC is a good choice, but they will often still feel not quite comfortable, even if they can't say why.
 
Yup. We will still see residual effects that are fed by the usual unscrupulous (usually darkish blue) suspects, but the claims will seem more and more disingenuous to the smarter parents! These are the peeps we want anyway so I'm fine if the weaker minds don't come to the Hill due to these reasons. The OAD myth will also not fool those prospects that I prefer too!

I'm naturally optimistic, so I read many of the signs lately as very positive. I see how the glass half empty crowd could see them differently, but that is how they always see things!
 
Here's a thought, how would people feel if Roy pulled in a 4 man class ranked 34, 45, 49 and 65?

I'd say we'd be happy if they were anything like the '12 group with those rankings: Marcus, JP, Brice and Big Joel.

Just using these numbers to illustrate how the rankings can be unreliable when evaluating recruiting success.....
 
Here's a thought, how would people feel if Roy pulled in a 4 man class ranked 34, 45, 49 and 65?

I'd say we'd be happy if they were anything like the '12 group with those rankings: Marcus, JP, Brice and Big Joel.

Just using these numbers to illustrate how the rankings can be unreliable when evaluating recruiting success.....
Is the 20th ranked player that much better than the 49th? I would say pretty doubtful.
 
I know most folks now want to dismiss the NCAA stuff as a issue of the past and that we are now over that hurdle and that is true to an extent. But a very real issue we are dealing with in this 2017 class is that when you typically start making your inroads to a recruit is in their soph and Jr seasons, when they get to their senior season most of the already have a pretty firm impression of where they are most impressed with.

In the 2017 class, we still had the NCAA cloud hanging over us, that stunted our ability to get in early on some of these guys. Great example is Carter, we got way behind on him because he was concerned with the NCAA issues we had. When you are dealing with schools like duke and Ky, it is hard enough to compete with them for a recruit on equal footing but to have to compete with them from way behind is well, double tuff.

There will be some very slight hang over for the 2018 class but by 2019 the NCAA stuff will be totally forgotten and not effect us further. We seem to have a good amount of buzz with the 2018 class already and I am expecting things to be much easier for Roy to get recruits from that class. But we are clearly struggling to get the big men we need from this 2017 class, we have a shot at a couple very good ones we are not the clear leader for any of the guys we fans really dream of from this class.

Now the other issue we have is that we are not seen as the school that really helps these one & done fellas as much as a couple other blue bloods are perceived to. That is just a situation that is going to take us getting one and he be able to clear that one & done pathway.

Not great news I know but is what it is right now. On the better news front, we are seen as a program that does tend to do more with less talent wise and that song does make a better talent guy stop and look, if they can do that with lesser talent, with me they could really be something. In the end all these kids, be they one & done or be they lesser, they all want to play for a winner in college. If we can find our way back to the final 4 again this season, I think we can, our recruiting will explode, this season and how we play is critical!!!

I want to add, it is very critical how duke and Ky play this season as well. I strongly believe Ky will under achieve because IMO their recruiting class is way over hyped (they will win the easy SEC but outside of the easy SEC conference games they are not going to be what folks expect them to be). Now duke, really, with the perception of the talent they have for the coming season, nothing less than a final 4 can be taken as acceptable or expected. That is a lot to expect for a team based on freshmen and while they were able to get that done a couple years ago, a lot fell right for them and you should not bet on being that fortunate all the time. The only way duke can meet the expectations for next season may to win it all but absolutely anything less than a final 4 will be seen as under achieving, that is a ton of pressure for a team that will depend so hard on freshmen to lead them.
Spot on with the NCAA leftovers. That is exactly what opened the door for undesirables to get in with Carter. I posted before that was a painful parting slap in the face and particularly frustrating since Roy's program did literally nothing wrong, yet the haters in the media gave grist to the liars/charlatans/Capels of the recruiting world.

I'll add that our early game with uk is VITAL for recruiting cred because if we lose the media magpies will be creaming all over the OADs. It also wouldn't hurt to sweep the dookies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hark_The_Sound_2010
Here's a thought, how would people feel if Roy pulled in a 4 man class ranked 34, 45, 49 and 65?

I'd say we'd be happy if they were anything like the '12 group with those rankings: Marcus, JP, Brice and Big Joel.

Just using these numbers to illustrate how the rankings can be unreliable when evaluating recruiting success.....
Paige and Brice exceeded their rankings by a wide margin. I think if you objectively look at that class, not getting a starting center is still a minus considering there was a starting spot open. Sure the centers that turned us down did not exactly have stellar college careers (though they were starters), but I think it is reasonable to wonder what Roy could have done with one of those guys.
 
Here's a thought, how would people feel if Roy pulled in a 4 man class ranked 34, 45, 49 and 65?

Just using these numbers to illustrate how the rankings can be unreliable when evaluating recruiting success.....

I'd be happy with that provided at least two were big men. The talent gap between ranking spots decreases considerably after the top 10-15 players, IMO.
 
Not sure if the topic stated is the ranking of the offers or the lack of volume of offers. Either way, here's my 2 cents:

With the last 2 or so classes, we've had to deal with the thick of the NCAA problems. I think we're currently in the residual levels now. What's concerning to me and has been for quite sometime is that we need at least a 4 man class, and we don't even look like we're going to land that with our current offers.

It's perplexing that Roy & co. were delivering offers in droves last year when we didn't have much of a chance due to the NCAA still breathing down our necks, yet when we have a better chance, we go back to our "selective" tactics, which have not worked and don't seem to be working right now.

I think most of us would be content with a class similar to the 2012. Perhaps with some guys that could come and start day 1. But among our current offers, we don't even have that. We want 2-3 bigs, but no one among our current list is looking to be apart of something like that.

And I know many like to cite
  • Roy's Hard work
  • Harrison Barnes' commitment
  • "Well why hasn't [Player] commited to [School] yet if they love it so much?"
Outside of Roy's Hard work, these are excuses. And poor ones at that.

None of us know Roy's recruiting tactics, but in the end, he needs them to produce results. And that's currently not looking like the case
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bur-Heel
Not sure if the topic stated is the ranking of the offers or the lack of volume of offers. Either way, here's my 2 cents:

With the last 2 or so classes, we've had to deal with the thick of the NCAA problems. I think we're currently in the residual levels now. What's concerning to me and has been for quite sometime is that we need at least a 4 man class, and we don't even look like we're going to land that with our current offers.

It's perplexing that Roy & co. were delivering offers in droves last year when we didn't have much of a chance due to the NCAA still breathing down our necks, yet when we have a better chance, we go back to our "selective" tactics, which have not worked and don't seem to be working right now.

I think most of us would be content with a class similar to the 2012. Perhaps with some guys that could come and start day 1. But among our current offers, we don't even have that. We want 2-3 bigs, but no one among our current list is looking to be apart of something like that.

And I know many like to cite
  • Roy's Hard work
  • Harrison Barnes' commitment
  • "Well why hasn't [Player] commited to [School] yet if they love it so much?"
Outside of Roy's Hard work, these are excuses. And poor ones at that.

None of us know Roy's recruiting tactics, but in the end, he needs them to produce results. And that's currently not looking like the case
:rolleyes: I don't see an "excuse" among that list. Might want to check the definition of the word... and maybe chill while you're at it.
 
:rolleyes: I don't see an "excuse" among that list. Might want to check the definition of the word... and maybe chill while you're at it.

Excuse
- attempt to lessen the blame attaching to (a fault or offense); seek to defend or justify.

OK, now that that's out of the way, let's look at the 2 statements I named.

Harrison Barnes Recruitment: Yes, we managed to swing a recruit all the way from "lock to Dook" to "commitment to UNC".

Why it's a poor excuse: It's brought up every time a player is suggested to be leaning anywhere but UNC, yet that player rarely ends up @ UNC. That was nearly 6 years ago to the date. About 5 recruiting classes in the past. Not only has it not happened since, but it has no bearings or even context in the current recruiting landscape.

"Well why hasn't [Player] commited to [School] yet if they love it so much?": A common go-to quote among this board. Said about Giles, Ingram, and many others. Currently being said about Carter, Knox, and others in this class. I imagine it will be said many times more in the future.

Why it's a poor excuse: Because in the past 5 recruiting classes, we haven't landed one of those players that this was said about. In fact, they usually ended up at the school they were linked to. Prospects drag their recruitment out for months now. Why? who knows. Fame? Tickets? Whatever you want it to be. But when was the last time we landed a recruit that committed late?

_____________

I can assure you I'm as calm as calm can be. But unlike some on this board, I don't have a selective memory. This has the looks of the 2015 class at it's current point in time. Except this time, we can't blame it on the NCAA. So what do we blame it on then?

And I know it's "early" in the process. But it's not as early as some of you will have others think. Recruits start prioritizing their visits and schools right around this time.

However, I realize you tend to have better info then some of us who don't go to these events in person, so perhaps you have some info why us hardly having any solid leads so far isn't a reason to raise some concern?

Feel free to put us at ease.
 
Not sure if the topic stated is the ranking of the offers or the lack of volume of offers. Either way, here's my 2 cents:

With the last 2 or so classes, we've had to deal with the thick of the NCAA problems. I think we're currently in the residual levels now. What's concerning to me and has been for quite sometime is that we need at least a 4 man class, and we don't even look like we're going to land that with our current offers.

It's perplexing that Roy & co. were delivering offers in droves last year when we didn't have much of a chance due to the NCAA still breathing down our necks, yet when we have a better chance, we go back to our "selective" tactics, which have not worked and don't seem to be working right now.

I think most of us would be content with a class similar to the 2012. Perhaps with some guys that could come and start day 1. But among our current offers, we don't even have that. We want 2-3 bigs, but no one among our current list is looking to be apart of something like that.

And I know many like to cite
  • Roy's Hard work
  • Harrison Barnes' commitment
  • "Well why hasn't [Player] commited to [School] yet if they love it so much?"
Outside of Roy's Hard work, these are excuses. And poor ones at that.

None of us know Roy's recruiting tactics, but in the end, he needs them to produce results. And that's currently not looking like the case
The number of offers last year were directly related to the NCAA mess and having to cast a wider net. Last year at this time, Roy had to consider the strong possibility that Meeks and Jackson might go pro. As a result we had to get a big man that could start if needed (Bradley) as a freshman if Meeks left early, and to also provide depth in the post if Meeks did return for his senior season. We also faced the possibility of only having one player taller than 6-4 (Pinson 6-6) to play the 3 spot if Jackson had left at the end of last season. Robinson (6-5) also hopefully also give the team another 3 pt option with the monumental loss of Paige.

As for the 2017 recruiting class, my understanding is that there is a significant drop off in talent for big men ranked once you go past the top 25 (or wherever Tilmon is currently ranked). Which is the likely reason for why Roy has not offered big men ranked outside of the top 25 at this time. I believe the staff is in contact with other bigs in this class and I am sure those bigs are well aware of where Brice was ranked in 2012 and how he ended up drafted number 25 in the draft. My guess is the 2-3 bigs that will probably be getting offers in the near future will respond favorably to being recruited by UNC and not being offered earlier won't be a complete deal breaker because of the Brice Johnson effect.
 
Last edited:

Excuse
- attempt to lessen the blame attaching to (a fault or offense); seek to defend or justify.

OK, now that that's out of the way, let's look at the 2 statements I named.

Harrison Barnes Recruitment: Yes, we managed to swing a recruit all the way from "lock to Dook" to "commitment to UNC".

Why it's a poor excuse: It's brought up every time a player is suggested to be leaning anywhere but UNC, yet that player rarely ends up @ UNC. That was nearly 6 years ago to the date. About 5 recruiting classes in the past. Not only has it not happened since, but it has no bearings or even context in the current recruiting landscape.

"Well why hasn't [Player] commited to [School] yet if they love it so much?": A common go-to quote among this board. Said about Giles, Ingram, and many others. Currently being said about Carter, Knox, and others in this class. I imagine it will be said many times more in the future.

Why it's a poor excuse: Because in the past 5 recruiting classes, we haven't landed one of those players that this was said about. In fact, they usually ended up at the school they were linked to. Prospects drag their recruitment out for months now. Why? who knows. Fame? Tickets? Whatever you want it to be. But when was the last time we landed a recruit that committed late?

_____________

I can assure you I'm as calm as calm can be. But unlike some on this board, I don't have a selective memory. This has the looks of the 2015 class at it's current point in time. Except this time, we can't blame it on the NCAA. So what do we blame it on then?

And I know it's "early" in the process. But it's not as early as some of you will have others think. Recruits start prioritizing their visits and schools right around this time.

However, I realize you tend to have better info then some of us who don't go to these events in person, so perhaps you have some info why us hardly having any solid leads so far isn't a reason to raise some concern?

Feel free to put us at ease.
Sorry but that's still a misuse of the term, i.e., signing Barnes cannot by definition be an "excuse" for not getting a player this year unless his signing somehow prevented us getting someone this time, which of course it can't. But y'know what, not worth belaboring... SO, all that notwithstanding, all I'm saying is there's no reason to be doggin' Roy in July.
 
Why would anyone talk about blame or excuses in July? Nobody in the history of bball has ever called their season's recruiting done this early Even those who have filled all their schollys will try to hedge their bets.. Why should Roy be the first coach in history to be judged half way through the recruiting process? I know the same old lazy and ignorant replies will soon spew forth, calling me a homer or accusing me of worshiping Roy, but it doesn't change how ridiculous this topic is!

I see evaluation, and hard work AND some see a lost cause.

I DO NOT want Roy to just dump offers to every 5 * player! I WANT him to carefully select peeps I can enjoy as players AND be proud of as representatives of my U!

I'm optimistic and we will prosper with or without the sky is falling crowd just like last year!
 
Sorry but that's still a misuse of the term, i.e., signing Barnes cannot by definition be an "excuse" for not getting a player this year unless his signing somehow prevented us getting someone this time, which of course it can't. But y'know what, not worth belaboring... SO, all that notwithstanding, all I'm saying is there's no reason to be doggin' Roy in July.

It's an excuse when someone tries to justify us pursuing a recruit who clearly has no interest in us, or simply saying a recruit is going elsewhere. Whether it's the correct use of it or not, you should take that up with those who choose to say so. I can't count how many times it's been said on this board.

There's a story about an Ant and a Grasshopper I think some of you would enjoy.

Why would anyone talk about blame or excuses in July? Nobody in the history of bball has ever called their season's recruiting done this early Even those who have filled all their schollys will try to hedge their bets.. Why should Roy be the first coach in history to be judged half way through the recruiting process? I know the same old lazy and ignorant replies will soon spew forth, calling me a homer or accusing me of worshiping Roy, but it doesn't change how ridiculous this topic is!

I see evaluation, and hard work AND some see a lost cause.

I DO NOT want Roy to just dump offers to every 5 * player! I WANT him to carefully select peeps I can enjoy as players AND be proud of as representatives of my U!

I'm optimistic and we will prosper with or without the sky is falling crowd just like last year!

If anyone's going to call you a "homer", it'll probably be because homers tend to love throwing around the phrase "the sky is falling" whenever someone raises any concerns not viewed as positive about anything UNC related, instead of simply exclaiming cheers and "LA-DI-DAs" in every post.
 
Not sure if the topic stated is the ranking of the offers or the lack of volume of offers. Either way, here's my 2 cents:

With the last 2 or so classes, we've had to deal with the thick of the NCAA problems. I think we're currently in the residual levels now. What's concerning to me and has been for quite sometime is that we need at least a 4 man class, and we don't even look like we're going to land that with our current offers.

It's perplexing that Roy & co. were delivering offers in droves last year when we didn't have much of a chance due to the NCAA still breathing down our necks, yet when we have a better chance, we go back to our "selective" tactics, which have not worked and don't seem to be working right now.

I think most of us would be content with a class similar to the 2012. Perhaps with some guys that could come and start day 1. But among our current offers, we don't even have that. We want 2-3 bigs, but no one among our current list is looking to be apart of something like that.

And I know many like to cite
  • Roy's Hard work
  • Harrison Barnes' commitment
  • "Well why hasn't [Player] commited to [School] yet if they love it so much?"
Outside of Roy's Hard work, these are excuses. And poor ones at that.

None of us know Roy's recruiting tactics, but in the end, he needs them to produce results. And that's currently not looking like the case

Kinda confusing honestly, I am not sure I understand what you are saying? But I think any discussion of this must start with an understanding of how difficult the results that we would all love to see actually are. It starts with the fact that we have just spent 5+ years with a negative spot light shining down on us every single day by the national sports media. That isn't something that you just toss off once the spotlight is finally turned away. And keep in mind it still is not totally turned away, it is still today hard to find an article from the national media that does not want to bring up the NCAA issues and as well keep in mind that the NCAA may have stated that our basketball (men's) program committed no punishable offense the NCAA still has not handed down the punishment and when it does a new national discussion will be inspired that will not look good for us. While the worst may be past us, the not knowing how our basketball and football programs will come out of this, the whole thing is still very much here and is still on the minds of recruits. And yes, this is still very much at play for this 2017 class recruiting as I spoke to in a post above.

It is still very much an uphill slog for us, for Roy and especially for this 2017 class where relationships were formed before the NCAA released the current NOA. To not acknowledge that is keeping our head buried in the sand. AS we so often see, successful recruiting is all about perception, it is about creating that perception in a recruits mind that this place will serve his needs above all others. Fans want to think it is about reality more than perception, it isn't, not sure it ever has been. It is like we vote for a politician not for what he will actually do but because the perception is created that the politician will do exactly what we all want and even knowing they never do we still vote for that person because of the perception rather than the reality.

And what creates perception, a bunch of lies usually, but lies that those we want to say yes to us find easier to believe. There has been a steady stream of lies and we know they are lies that have been lodged against us for a long while now and the more those lies have been told the easier they have become to believe. The lies that have been told about us that got us in the negative spotlight by the media were not the only things but they allowed the rest of the lies to seem to have cred. Lies like Roy does not star freshmen, when he actually has what, 4 out of the last 5yrs or so years or Roy holds his freshmen back from being one & done? What is Roy supposed to do, push a kid out the door that isn't ready for the NBA like Kalipari did with Skal? But that is reality and the point is perception has little if anything to do with reality. Reality you can change rather quickly but perception not based on reality can take a while.

That is where the problem is found, perception may not be grounded in reality but it sure can dictate reality. Teams like duke and Ky get great talent, more than we have been able to snag for the last several years now and if you get to put a more talented team on the floor, a team of multiple top 10 players in a single class then the lesser talented team has to work harder for what they get and that is at least for now our reality. The teams that get to field the multiple one & done talents are going to win more because at the end of the day it comes down to the talent more than any other thing. There is talent outside of the top 20 players in the country but most of that talent takes longer to show itself on the court.

It is a tuff spot, Roy has spent a lot of time in tuff spots over the last few years and a lot of the tuff spot situations we have been in have been made extra tuff by the expectations of UNC fans themselves, we have become our own worst enemy far to often. For example, we just ended our season by making it to the NCAA title game but sadly few UNC fans seem to realize that, all most seem to recall is that we lost that game? Some how out of a GREAT season, we fans seem to have snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory?

And even now, with every one of us knowing that our recruiting right now is a uphill battle we still expect to snag any top talent we want. We see Robinson commit to a mid major and we figure crap, how are we losing recruits to a mid major? We see Tillman pick Ill and we wonder ILL, how the heck are we losing players to Ill? We don't look or really even care what the reasons the kids relied on to make their choice, we feel like we lost with a couple of lesser front court guys that we have no chance with higher rated front court guys, like we have lost even before we actually lose?

Ut oh, time to panic, time to offer any kid over 6'8", doesn't matter if they can play, 6'8" or taller is all we need to know. maybe we can take an ad out on Craig's list? LOL Like we have not paniced before and yet in the end the one constant was always that UNC basketball when the games began to be played was always there. Fans may have paniced but Roy went to work coaching the players he had, not fretting over the players he doesn't. So maybe we fret to much over what we don't have and forget to celebrate what we do have? What we have is a pre-season top 10 ranked team that IMO has a great shot at getting back to the final 4 and maybe then some more. Who we get is gonna be who we get and Roy will work with them and develop a team from those individual parts. There are about 5 other big men we fans wanted more than Brice Johnson in his recruiting class but Roy got Brice, Roy worked with Brice, Brice turned out pretty darn good.

So my message is to relax, what wil be will be, enjoy the ride but know before ya get on, it is going to be bumpy at times, it always is, why would we expect different? But it wil also be a really great ride more often than not, isn't that more than perception, hasn't that been our reality?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary-7
It's an excuse when someone tries to justify us pursuing a recruit who clearly has no interest in us, or simply saying a recruit is going elsewhere. Whether it's the correct use of it or not, you should take that up with those who choose to say so. I can't count how many times it's been said on this board.

There's a story about an Ant and a Grasshopper I think some of you would enjoy.



If anyone's going to call you a "homer", it'll probably be because homers tend to love throwing around the phrase "the sky is falling" whenever someone raises any concerns not viewed as positive about anything UNC related, instead of simply exclaiming cheers and "LA-DI-DAs" in every post.

Rose, I think when folks bring up Barnes or even Brandan Wright it is just to say that kids do not always end up where they are projected to in July. That is not as much excuse as it is a counter to those who say a kid is a lock this place or another. Point being that situations in recruiting are fluid most of the time, things change and those things that change can effect where a kid ends up. Carter for example is very likely to end up at duke but he has not announced yet either, that can change thou I do not expect it to. I don't think Roy is recruiting him like he expects to get him either. Bamba on the other hand, we still have a shot there, hard to say how good it is but Roy knows the kid much better than you or I. While I do not like the trust in Roy reply, this is one of those that is harder to gauge and trusting Roy to know his chances there is smarter IMO. We have realistic shots at both Knox and PJ so backing away from either of them is not what I would want at this point.

So my question, other than maybe carter, who would you have us back away from right now? There are a couple of offers I would like to see Roy get out but I expect them to get out shortly. Understand, we are in the part of the summer when Roy gets to see more of some of these kids that he will offer shortly, for example Roy is just now being able to see more of McCoy and get to understand where his head is, I think he will offer but what if Roy saw a kid at the peach jam that was not on his radar before that he saw something in, maybe that is a lesser name but a kid that can play? An offer out to one kid can effect how another kid looks at you and Roy has to weight out those factors as well.

My point is there is a lot going on right now, this is the heart of the recruiting season, not the end of it, this is like half time of a game, no time to just quit and give the other team the win at half time.
 
"Well why hasn't [Player] commited to [School] yet if they love it so much?"
Because if they go ahead and commit then the media attention wanes. I also don't believe for one second that these kids who cut their list to 10 are actually truly considering 10 schools. They know that when they do it they will get attention and then they can cut it to 4-5 and get attention again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyL

Excuse
- attempt to lessen the blame attaching to (a fault or offense); seek to defend or justify.

OK, now that that's out of the way, let's look at the 2 statements I named.

Harrison Barnes Recruitment: Yes, we managed to swing a recruit all the way from "lock to Dook" to "commitment to UNC".

Why it's a poor excuse: It's brought up every time a player is suggested to be leaning anywhere but UNC, yet that player rarely ends up @ UNC.


and there was also this kid named Wright. Remember him? LOCK to Duke.

Now name me 2 "locks" to UNC that went to the dukies.
 
What would you call it when every post from some peeps are either showing they are afraid of puke and UK in recruiting or they think Roy can't pull in the recruits we need despite his success? I AM a homer, because I AM a Tar Heel fan! What I'm not is unable to see truth. The truth I see is clear for those without agendas. UNC is on the rise. UNC just played in the National Championship. UNC is being spoken of by coaches and top recruits in a positive way. UNC has great recruits already committed in '17 and '18. UNC has PT for the first time in a while. The NCAA's ridiculous witch hunt is over and the smoke is clearing.

We will get a great class in '17 and a monster class in '18 and I expect to be in the hunt for the foreseeable future! Yup, the sky is definitely NOT falling and, btw it is Carolina Blue!
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary-7 and BillyL
DSouthr, your posts often require a lot of thought and typing, so I had to shorten some of my responses lol!

Kinda confusing honestly, I am not sure I understand what you are saying? But I think any discussion of this must start with an understanding of how difficult the results that we would all love to see actually are. It starts with the fact that we have just spent 5+ years with a negative spot light shining down on us every single day by the national sports media. That isn't something that you just toss off once the spotlight is finally turned away. And keep in mind it still is not totally turned away, it is still today hard to find an article from the national media that does not want to bring up the NCAA issues and as well keep in mind that the NCAA may have stated that our basketball (men's) program committed no punishable offense the NCAA still has not handed down the punishment and when it does a new national discussion will be inspired that will not look good for us. While the worst may be past us, the not knowing how our basketball and football programs will come out of this, the whole thing is still very much here and is still on the minds of recruits. And yes, this is still very much at play for this 2017 class recruiting as I spoke to in a post above.

That's what I was asking. I wasn't really sure what point was being raised about our offer strategy with the amount of data WWJD provided, so I provided my 2 cents on what I think the current recruiting strategy is.

Concerning the NCAA issues, "5+ Years" is a quote that should not be thrown around so often, because it's just inaccurate. I'm not taking away from it's severity or it's impact, but it has not been 5 straight years of this. The timeline also supports this. In fact, I'd even argue that the football stuff had less of an impact than the current situation does. What's more, between 2012 (Football sanctions) and 2014 (McCants' 15 seconds of fame), we had hardly anything to impact our recruiting. Willingham's comments were nowhere near as damning as something the NCAA could actually do to us.

It is still very much an uphill slog for us, for Roy and especially for this 2017 class where relationships were formed before the NCAA released the current NOA. To not acknowledge that is keeping our head buried in the sand. AS we so often see, successful recruiting is all about perception, it is about creating that perception in a recruits mind that this place will serve his needs above all others. Fans want to think it is about reality more than perception, it isn't, not sure it ever has been. It is like we vote for a politician not for what he will actually do but because the perception is created that the politician will do exactly what we all want and even knowing they never do we still vote for that person because of the perception rather than the reality.

I've been trying to talk reality since my first post in this thread. The problem is so many cannot accept the idea that our strategies may not be working. Let me give the scenario we've heard many times in the past few recruiting classes: Early Traction with some recruits, Generic Complements from them, But currently not looking to be the favorite of those players. The same ones on this board will keep repeating "It's Early" and "The later, the better". (We are here) One by One, we start missing out on recruits as they either lose interest, or keep us in their final list but never visit. Those on this board blame the NCAA.

You can tell me this is an overreaction if you'd like, but this has been the case for the past 2 recruiting classes. If things are truly as you say, then this shouldn't be considered far left.

And what creates perception, a bunch of lies usually, but lies that those we want to say yes to us find easier to believe. There has been a steady stream of lies and we know they are lies that have been lodged against us for a long while now and the more those lies have been told the easier they have become to believe. The lies that have been told about us that got us in the negative spotlight by the media were not the only things but they allowed the rest of the lies to seem to have cred. Lies like Roy does not star freshmen, when he actually has what, 4 out of the last 5yrs or so years or Roy holds his freshmen back from being one & done? What is Roy supposed to do, push a kid out the door that isn't ready for the NBA like Kalipari did with Skal?...

So then what is the problem we're trying to back here? You can't blame the NCAA for all of our recruiting woes, then flip around and tell those who raise concerns about our recruiting to calm down. I'm not saying you specifically, but there are those who do just this. And they know who they are.

That is where the problem is found, perception may not be grounded in reality but it sure can dictate reality. Teams like duke and Ky get great talent, more than we have been able to snag for the last several years now and if you get to put a more talented team on the floor, a team of multiple top 10 players in a single class then the lesser talented team has to work harder for what they get and that is at least for now our reality. The teams that get to field the multiple one & done talents are going to win more because at the end of the day it comes down to the talent more than any other thing. There is talent outside of the top 20 players in the country but most of that talent takes longer to show itself on the court.

The "perception" of our program is that we aren't recruiting at an elite level at the moment. Personally, I couldn't care less about what our recruiting rank is, but I do mind how our players end up performing. In 2017, we will lose at least 4 players on our team, and possibly 2 more to the NBA. We could be looking at a tough season if we don't fill those shoes. Now we can just sit around and pretend certain guys in this class will suddenly fall in love with UNC, but that hasn't happened since, guess who? Harrison Barnes.

I would love a class with some guys that could come in and contribute solid minutes their freshman year. Regardless of their rank. But we don't have that, and there's a chance we may not get that, regardless if many of us can admit it or not.

It is a tuff spot, Roy has spent a lot of time in tuff spots over the last few years and a lot of the tuff spot situations we have been in have been made extra tuff by the expectations of UNC fans themselves, we have become our own worst enemy far to often. For example, we just ended our season by making it to the NCAA title game but sadly few UNC fans seem to realize that, all most seem to recall is that we lost that game? Some how out of a GREAT season, we fans seem to have snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory?

I remember a great season. I remember one of the greatest runs and toughest losses I've ever experienced. I also remember the 3 previous seasons we had, such as the 10+ losses, PJ Hairston fiasco, very painful Dook losses and NCAA tourney exits, while missing on top recruits who could have turned our program in the right direction. There has been plenty of good and plenty of bad, and I don't have a selective memory.

The problem with our fanbase is we have those who want to sacrifice Roy to the Basketball gods bickering with those who want to paint Roy as perfect cross of god and Dean Smith. Criticism is considered blasphemy and those who don't go bow to their Roy Shrine every night are "not real fans".

And even now, with every one of us knowing that our recruiting right now is a uphill battle we still expect to snag any top talent we want. We see Robinson commit to a mid major and we figure crap, how are we losing recruits to a mid major? We see Tillman pick Ill and we wonder ILL, how the heck are we losing players to Ill? We don't look or really even care what the reasons the kids relied on to make their choice, we feel like we lost with a couple of lesser front court guys that we have no chance with higher rated front court guys, like we have lost even before we actually lose?

While we are on the downswing of this NCAA drama, I don't dispute it still has an affect on us. I doubt many recruits understand or even care about the jargon of the NOA other than it could be sanctions. We have the University to blame for keeping this going for so long.

That being said, we did miss out on Tilmon and a few others, and this has happened to us before. But there are 2 things that are different than before:

  • We're losing a lot of good players next year
  • We don't have any other recruits favoring us at the moment.
Even in 2015 and 2016, we had guys who were at least solid leans, regardless of where they committed to in the end. That is concerning. Some of you say we are "monitoring other guys" but we haven't seen any information suggesting such a thing since the July period began. Perhaps will see a flurry of offers before July ends, because following that is the Quiet Period, and recruits do start checking their priorities, contrary to belief.

Ut oh, time to panic....

No, it's not time to panic, and most of us are not panicking. And I wish people would stop relating discussing recruiting issues to panicking. Regardless of our recruiting class outcome, I'm going to enjoy the 2016-17 season, and hope to see the Heels win it all.

But at some point in time, the outcome of our 2017 recruiting is going to affect the direction of UNC Basketball. I just hope it's for the better this time.
 
and there was also this kid named Wright. Remember him? LOCK to Duke.

Now name me 2 "locks" to UNC that went to the dukies.

We haven't even had 2 players that had a Dook and UNC offer that committed to UNC since Barnes.

The last player we landed with a Dook and UNC offer was Pinson. And he wasn't even favorited for Dook. The predictions were for Indiana before he "shocked the world". On the day of his commitment, most of us weren't even following it because we thought we were well behind Dook, Indiana, and the other team on his list (can't remember who).

We have offered many Dookies who ended up at Dook in the end, though. Parker, Jones, their entire 2014 class.

The best that can even be given would be Ingram. He was a favorite for UNC until Dook offered. I don't know Giles' story, but early on people talked about him or his family being UNC fans. Then it was nothing but Wake Forest and Dook being linked to him. Give it a few months, and I'll throw Carter in there too.
 
Because if they go ahead and commit then the media attention wanes. I also don't believe for one second that these kids who cut their list to 10 are actually truly considering 10 schools. They know that when they do it they will get attention and then they can cut it to 4-5 and get attention again.

That falls under "fame", I suppose. I think that those with "10 schools" usually have their favorites among them, and are usually the ones they take OV's to.

Unfortunately, we rarely get those kids.
 
A couple of years ago, when things were looking particularly bleak, I pointed out that we hadn't landed a top big man since Henson - who, committed in January, 2008.

You could argue that McAdoo, who signed in 2009, should be counted because he was a top-ranked recruit. Or you can argue he doesn't count because he never achieved at the expected level.

You can also argue that Brice is an exception. I'll leave it up to you whether Brice should be counted because of his great senior year, or if Brice proves the point because it took him 4 years to get there.

Since Zeller and Henson left, we have had a number of good bigs. But until Brice this year, no great bigs. But the sheer number of bigs we had seemed to discourage top recruits because they wouldn't leave a lot of PT. And, of course, the NCAA stuff.

However you look at it, and for whatever reasons, it's been a long time since we've landed top bigs. Tony may turn out to be the first in a long time - especially as his ranking continues to improve.

Unfortunately, we now need to land 2 top bigs. At least 2. To see the last time that happened, I believe you have to look back to the class of 2008 - Zeller and Davis in the same class. Both of whom signed in 2007. That's a long time ago. And a lot has changed in the recruiting world since then. Yet that's what we need to do in the class of 2017.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoseHeel
We haven't even had 2 players that had a Dook and UNC offer that committed to UNC since Barnes.

The last player we landed with a Dook and UNC offer was Pinson. And he wasn't even favorited for Dook. The predictions were for Indiana before he "shocked the world". On the day of his commitment, most of us weren't even following it because we thought we were well behind Dook, Indiana, and the other team on his list (can't remember who).

We have offered many Dookies who ended up at Dook in the end, though. Parker, Jones, their entire 2014 class.

The best that can even be given would be Ingram. He was a favorite for UNC until Dook offered. I don't know Giles' story, but early on people talked about him or his family being UNC fans. Then it was nothing but Wake Forest and Dook being linked to him. Give it a few months, and I'll throw Carter in there too.

I dont think Roy is really recruiting Carter at this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoseHeel
It's an excuse when someone tries to justify us pursuing a recruit who clearly has no interest in us, or simply saying a recruit is going elsewhere. Whether it's the correct use of it or not, you should take that up with those who choose to say so. I can't count how many times it's been said on this board.
I believe the term you're looking for is "succor", but I digress...
So, what's the complaint? You got on Roy for being selective in a previous post, then here above you denigrate going after a recruit who has no interest in us (I'm not sure whom that would be???)... which is it?

Look, I'm not trying to be contentious --- we're all on the same side here with different perspectives, so here's what I know about Roy's recruiting strategy from what I've gleaned / been told over the years:
Roy and staff do look at all the Blue Chip players, including all the elite kids --- first for their ability/game (and since they're elite players most of them will be enticing), second for the "fit" of those skills in our program at this time and over time, and of course if they're good enough you can often make them fit, but generally like with Dean, fit is very important... then they go about due diligence, i.e., gauging their interest in us (if that's not there then move on) and finally vetting them for academics/character/AAU issues (weeds out several of the elite), and if that's good, finally their interpersonal "fit" with their potential teammates (that latter aspect usually comes out on unofficial visits/pickup games/past history, and it's very important here). Our staff also looks for the kids who might not have lofty rankings (like Brice or Platek) who jump out at them in evaluations and have what it takes, and finally then the solid glue-guys who love Carolina and/or can help the program for 4 years.

Now obviously all that translates into "selective" in a normal cycle and I for one am ALL about that. Remember, in normal seasons we don't have to constantly snag five-member classes like Calipari just to restock the roster. However, as you and others correctly point out this is not a normal cycle. We could use a big class given we're losing four seniors and maybe a junior or two.
For my two cents on the wish list, IMO here's what we absolutely NEED, since we have Jalek on board:
-One Top-100 type Big
-One knock-down shooter
-One athletic 6'6-6'8 Wing

Here's what I really, really, really WANT:
-Add to the above or make that Top-100 Big a truly elite Big

Here's my guilty luxury:
-Add another elite Big
-or add a pure PG
-or add a "project" Big

Now, what are the chances? I don't put much stock in who supposedly "leads" in July. The track records of these recruiting sites on that is no better than a coin-flip. I have heard that Roy and staff feel they are very much in contention to make it down to my "really, really, really want list" and maybe further, BUT there are no guarantees. Given our needs/wants there is a limited pool in the Big department for '17. Like you and everyone here I will be very disappointed if we don't snag an elite Big. If you look at those I consider to fit that category (Carter, Bamba, PJ, McCoy), and if I believe the worst of what I've heard (that Carter might have drank the Capel kool-aid), we are still very much in it with PJ and Mo, and maybe McCoy as well if Roy pursues). I'll have my ear to the ground and fingers crossed, but the world won't end if we only get the "need" part of that list. It's just a set-back that Roy will bust his ass to resolve in '18.
 
Last edited:
Lots of stuff there Rose, gonna try to reply to some of it, if I miss something will be glad to reply to that as well. First, I think you know so for the benefit of others, we are just discussing and not in a argument. I don't want others to think we are in a dispute just because we may not see everything exactly the same.

OK, so "The "perception" of our program is that we aren't recruiting at an elite level at the moment. Personally, I couldn't care less about what our recruiting rank is, but I do mind how our players end up performing. In 2017, we will lose at least 4 players on our team, and possibly 2 more to the NBA. We could be looking at a tough season if we don't fill those shoes. Now we can just sit around and pretend certain guys in this class will suddenly fall in love with UNC, but that hasn't happened since, guess who? Harrison Barnes."

^ Actually, that isn't as much perception as reality, perception explains why we are not recruiting at the levels we have in the past.

"So then what is the problem we're trying to back here? You can't blame the NCAA for all of our recruiting woes, then flip around and tell those who raise concerns about our recruiting to calm down. I'm not saying you specifically, but there are those who do just this. And they know who they are."

^
I have never said or believed that the NCAA issues explained our dip in recruiting, it has for sure been a factor but not the whole story. I actually spoke to this about a year ago and many disgreed, I tried sharing then that when this NCAA stuff was finally over that it would not be back to green flag racin and it has not been. The larger issue is how UNC is perceived, rightly or wrongly by recruits. Now the NCAA stuff did act as a bit of a catalyst but several other issues have played in to that perception and that wil not be so easy to move away from.

"Concerning the NCAA issues, "5+ Years" is a quote that should not be thrown around so often, because it's just inaccurate. I'm not taking away from it's severity or it's impact, but it has not been 5 straight years of this. The timeline also supports this. In fact, I'd even argue that the football stuff had less of an impact than the current situation does. What's more, between 2012 (Football sanctions) and 2014 (McCants' 15 seconds of fame), we had hardly anything to impact our recruiting. Willingham's comments were nowhere near as damning as something the NCAA could actually do to us."

^ Gonna strongly disagree on that, we have been under the NCAA hammer for the most of the last 5yrs. The NCAA is going to hammer UNC has been constantly used against us for that entire term, while that cloud was hanging over us the notion was cemented in those kids that the NCAA could and likely will give UNC the death penalty any day now and you don't want to be a part of that, that could tumble your NBA dreams! It didn't matter that nothing new was going on for periods of that time, the it could happen any day now was very effectively used against us.

I would tell you just over the last couple years the NCAA is going to hammer UNC any day now was very effectively used against us with Markenson, Bam, Giles, Shabazz, Ochfor, Wiggins and Carter.

"The problem with our fanbase is we have those who want to sacrifice Roy to the Basketball gods bickering with those who want to paint Roy as perfect cross of god and Dean Smith. Criticism is considered blasphemy and those who don't go bow to their Roy Shrine every night are "not real fans"."

I for one fall in the middle and always have. When I have disagreed with Roy I have said it here publically. And when I agree with him I say that to, I don't really like the trust in Roy reply because Roy makes mistakes at times, we all do. But I do like Roy being over this program, I trust that Roy will do the right thing and that is the trait I need to see in our coach, even if I don't always agree with what he does. I seem to be able to get away with saying what I think when it applies to Roy, maybe because of how I say things as opposed to what I say? I try to be fair when I critique as opposed to calling for blood? LOL You know as well as I that some folks will go looking for a tall tree at the first sign of struggle and all they can discuss is what is wrong as opposed to what can be done to fix it. I try to identify what is wrong and then try to discuss how it can be fixed, in other words I try to look for solutions to the problem rather than problems in the solutions.
 
One more thing Rose, when ya read what I say, maybe I am a glass more full than empty at times kinda guy, I am not so much dumping on folks that are highly concerned about where we are right now in recruiting. I guarantee ya gary, myself, you, and pretty much any other poster here that you could not fit the edge of a playing card between the gap of concern we all feel about recruiting right now. It was NOT good news at all that Tillman and Robinson went other places, guarantee ya none of us like Carter going to duke as likely or take it lightly. But we just chose to focus more on what we may have as opposed to what we may not get.

Gary holds hope for us and carter, I don't agree but hope he is right, he likes where we are with Knox, I am not nearly as hopeful on that front, I do think we have a lot of work to do to get PJ because Texas is a larger factor IMO than gary feels they are.

We all get wrapped up in this recruiting stuff this time of the year but you tell me, what matters more, who we get in recruiting or how far we go in the NCAAT? What is more important, draft night for the NBA or the final 4 and our being in it? WE are worried about the wrong stuff this time of the year, I get why but we worry to much about that stuff.

Truth is we are gonna get who we get and Roy will develop a solid team from who ever he gets and in the end it is the team we have that really matters, more so than individual stars that have yet to play a single college game. Isn't that true?
 
Ross, you are simply way-off with a lot of your recruiting info. I'll leave it at that.
 
Gary holds hope for us and carter, I don't agree but hope he is right, he likes where we are with Knox, I am not nearly as hopeful on that front, I do think we have a lot of work to do to get PJ because Texas is a larger factor IMO than gary feels they are.
Gotta correct you there, Dave.
- Actually I posted that I do not see Knox coming to UNC from what I've heard thus far. That could change but...
- As of now I do believe we have a better shot with PJ. I know that Roy has done very well positioning himself there. I do however agree that Texas is a big factor, especially when I remembered Shaka was coaching the U18 team (&*%$^#). I do believe that both UNC and Texas are in front of uk at this point with Calipari trying to get back in.
- As I posted recently, I have heard something from inside his program that causes me to hold out less hope for Carter than a few weeks ago. Now I'll still hold out hope (why not?), but very little expectation at this point unless something changes back.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT