323-215 book it and lock it for hillary
I agree, Gary . . I believe she will win NC, FL, NV and hold the big 5 Blue states MI, MN, WI, PA and VA.
323-215 book it and lock it for hillary
I'm suggesting that someone has to take a stand. We are in an unsustainable death spiral socially, politically, economically that will result in the complete collapse of our nation if we don't do something to stop it. Four more years of maobama will be disastrous.
You may as well bend over, Nuke. Enjoy!If too many people have surrendered to the rigged system and vote for the $hill, then we are all screwed.
Well, I guess you didn't use the word racist, but when you start saying things like white conservative males in the south you are implying it in the context of your post.I didn't say they were racist. But, they are the other things.
No, just a general "are you satisfied with the direction of the country."I am guessing that the poll is referring to "do you trust the government knows what it's doing?"
No, I'm not. I'm just identifying the demographic.Well, I guess you didn't use the word racist, but when you start saying things like white conservative males in the south you are implying it in the context of your post.
No, you're making a generalization with racial overtones.No, I'm not. I'm just identifying the demographic.
323-215 book it and lock it for hillary
I love that this was your first piece of action after calling attention to the fact that you are 6-0
Racial is not racist.No, you're making a generalization with racial overtones.
There's a difference. Ignore it if you want.Thanks Aristotle
My bad. Trying to type on my phone and spell check took over. Meant to say racist.Racial is not racist.
Well, it was trying to help you. What I said had racial references. Racial is not racist.My bad. Trying to type on my phone and spell check took over. Meant to say racist.
i'm just guessing on the spread/gap...she's rolling tuesday, though.
if you want some action, just lemme know.
You giving me Trump +107?
hmmm...it was a pure guess, i'll ponder it...sometime tomorrow morning.
what about states?...hillary +/- 37
We have different definitions of extremely large.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/direction_of_country-902.html
I'll bet up to a sizable sum on Hillary under 37 states. Name your price and I'm in (within reason).
THIS is the kind of crazy that will be having a complete meltdown by Wednesday morning!
And, after researching the guy a little bit... he's exactly what I thought he was. If you immerse yourself in negativity, you're probably going to think everything is shitty.THIS is the kind of crazy that will be having a complete meltdown by Wednesday morning!
hmmm...it was a pure guess, i'll ponder it...sometime tomorrow morning.
what about states?...hillary +/- 37
You should stop betting. I'm really afraid she devil is going to win anyway. Even if it is rigged, you'll still have to pay all these bets. Maybe everyone you have bet with will just donate to the poor or a cancer fund.I will take the under for whatever you want.
You should stop betting. I'm really afraid she devil is going to win anyway. Even if it is rigged, you'll still have to pay all these bets. Maybe everyone you have bet with will just donate to the poor or a cancer fund.
I can't keep a man because I always kick them to the curb! I have a low tolerance for BS lol..... and I don't NEED one so.....You should stop nagging. No wonder you can't keep a man.
I agree. To me an "extremely large" portion of the population is 80-90%+. I mean at the very least I think it needs to be over 50%. As you've shown, roughly 60% of people don't approve of the direction of the country (I'm one of them). If one thing's for certain, it's that Clinton will continue down the current path for the country. I think it's pretty clear Trump will deviate from that path, some think that new path will be better, others think it will be worse. So I guess the question that voters have to ask themselves is: whether they're willing to take a chance on Trump that his direction will be better than the current bad direction.
I don't buy the hype that Trump wouldn't be able to refrain from launching nukes at the first opportunity, or that his "mean words" will ruin our (already crappy) foreign policy/relations, or that women and minorities will be oppressed under his administration. So for me, I'm willing to take that chance on him. At least it wouldn't be more of the same crappy direction.
I will take the under for whatever you want.
do we currently have a bet on just who wins?
i'll set it at hillary +/- 35 states...you want the under for $20?
I'm I reading this right, Gary . . ?
You are willing to bet that Clinton will win 35+ states . . ?
do we currently have a bet on just who wins?
i'll set it at hillary +/- 35 states...you want the under for $20?
I'm I reading this right, Gary . . ?
You are willing to bet that Clinton will win 35+ states . . ?
you can't be serious...all i've heard about the last 10 years was that the democrats were the party of doom and gloom.
you just proved fox news wrong, congratulations.
Yep, very serious.you can't be serious...all i've heard about the last 10 years was that the democrats were the party of doom and gloom.
you just proved fox news wrong, congratulations.
do we currently have a bet on just who wins?
i'll set it at hillary +/- 35 states...you want the under for $20?
are you kidding? 71 is gonna have to sell the store after tomorrow! LOLHey @UNC71-00, will you give him a discount at your new general store so he can eat after he gives away all of his money?
There's not 58 states? Damnit, I believed everything out of that man's mouth.If there's more action to go around, I'd take $20 on that too. Let me know.
The only way Hillary wins over 35 states is if Obama was right when he said there are 58 states - and all 8 of the phantom ones vote Hillary.
are you kidding? 71 is gonna have to sell the store after tomorrow! LOL
Hey @UNC71-00, will you give him a discount at your new general store so he can eat after he gives away all of his money?