After years of listening to Seth, I'm shocked he even has an audience... I mentioned in another thread the number of so called bball analysts that are so focused on the quad 1 argument (not mentioned and overlooked the other metrics used by the committee) and have really presented themselves as haters. The failed quad 1 results for this team is very telling and I fully understand. Sure you can make a case for or against this team but for almost every analyst I've seen, it's been over the top and unacceptable in my opinion. Many feel there is a hidden media bias towards UNC bball. I'm starting to believe it actually exists. Is it the case that these "analysts" all predicted no UNC this year and now eating crow, thus the extreme reactions? Many of these analysts I really respect. Am I just overacting and the injustice is not that big of a deal or...?