ADVERTISEMENT

I Side With... 2016 Election

strummingram

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Oct 1, 2010
46,132
19,942
113
https://www.isidewith.com/

This should be how we vote!

My results:

2401589114.jpg
 
Here's mine...... Okay wise-crackers, don't give me any lip! I mean it! LOL I do NOT want free stuff! I work very hard and take very good care of my myself, my home, my kids and don't need the government to help me! (some people do though and I am fine with helping!)
2401613879.jpg
 
I got "why the fโ€ขโ€ขk would you vote for any of them." This is similar to what my idea is for changing the voting process. I think most people would be shocked about election results if they changed the process.
 
I got "why the fโ€ขโ€ขk would you vote for any of them." This is similar to what my idea is for changing the voting process. I think most people would be shocked about election results if they changed the process.

I also think most people already know HOW to answer those questions to get the person they have already decided on before taking the quiz, but that would really work if people were just told candidate A believes this, candidate B this.... etc. and NEVER know who they are or what "party" they are affiliated with JUST the issues, nothing more. The results would vary somewhat I would think on a few things.
 
Dammit...I'm insulted that this thing gave me a 33% Hillary result. The winner, I agree with.

2401772096.jpg
 
96% in agreement with Donald Trump?!?!

You're smoking crack, Louigi.
NO, Donald Trump agrees with me. I was there before him so maybe he is smoking crack. We all know you will vote of Corrupt hilldog and I would need more that crack to vote for that scum.
 
Here's mine...... Okay wise-crackers, don't give me any lip! I mean it! LOL I do NOT want free stuff! I work very hard and take very good care of my myself, my home, my kids and don't need the government to help me! (some people do though and I am fine with helping!)
2401613879.jpg

hmm, so Strum answered the questions differently under his alter-ego it looks like ;)
 
Pretty close between Trump and Johnson. I answered every question on there to make sure it was thorough - sure took awhile though. In the more detailed description of what you matched on, I matched pretty evenly with Trump and Johnson. Didn't have any matching categories with the other 3.

I agree this should be how we vote. Makes people actually vote on the issues - and ignoring party affiliations, or innate biases against certain candidates based on media portrayals of said politicians.

2402257900.jpg
 
Last edited:
Pretty close between Trump and Johnson. I answered every question on there to make sure it was thorough - sure took awhile though. In the more detailed description of what you matched on, I matched pretty evenly with Trump and Johnson. Didn't have any matching categories with the other 3.

I think most of us end up being VERY different over the immigration issue more than any of the others.
 
Pretty close between Trump and Johnson. I answered every question on there to make sure it was thorough - sure took awhile though. In the more detailed description of what you matched on, I matched pretty evenly with Trump and Johnson. Didn't have any matching categories with the other 3.

I agree this should be how we vote. Makes people actually vote on the issues - and ignoring party affiliations, or innate biases against certain candidates based on media portrayals of said politicians.

2402257900.jpg

You and I have similar results. I knew you were one of the brighter guys here despite being a yank.
 
Here we go. I would have shared sooner, but it took me a while to finish cleaning up the vomit on my keyboard when I got a 19% from Sanders.

2402304427.jpg
 
It's a shame that the majority of poasters we've seen here have Johnson either in 1st, or within 10% of 1st - yet he'll finish a very very distant 3rd in the actual election (and probably 85%+ of voters will say "Who the hell is Gary Johnson?" when they see him on the card). I realize using this board as a proxy for the electorate as a whole isn't exactly rational, but I feel like a large portion of the voters would feel that way as well if they voted on the actual issues instead of what the news outlets tell them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheel0910
I knew the 2-in-1-party candidates would lose in that survey. They always do.
 
Great name for the party that I now belong to, the โ€œPox on Both Your Housesโ€ party.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/07/14/growing-faction-of-voters-say-neither-of-the-above/

Ugh, if only the republicans could have put out a candidate that wouldn't have alienated so many voters, they'd be able to keep that c-bag out of the White House.

Romney, McCain, hell - even Bob Dole (from back in the day, not now obviously - as he's been taken in the death pool) would have all steam rolled her in a general election. Now it's gonna be a tight one - that will probably end up going Clinton's way. Although the odds are narrowing on that.

Since the number of "Pox" voters seems to be rising - I guess there's still hope that it will be a 3rd candidate that wins - but who knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheel0910
Romney, McCain, hell - even Bob Dole (from back in the day, not now obviously - as he's been taken in the death pool) would have all steam rolled her in a general election. Now it's gonna be a tight one - that will probably end up going Clinton's way. Although the odds are narrowing on that.

.

Of course it's going to go Hillary's way. She won't win it, she'll steal it. In the last 3 months we've seen her dodge the FBI despite overwhelming evidence that she exhibited gross negligence and sheer incompetence and we've seen her steal the lead in the Dem party. That's just this summer. Then think about her history. The Clinton Machine doesn't lose.
 
Of course it's going to go Hillary's way. She won't win it, she'll steal it. In the last 3 months we've seen her dodge the FBI despite overwhelming evidence that she exhibited gross negligence and sheer incompetence and we've seen her steal the lead in the Dem party. That's just this summer. Then think about her history. The Clinton Machine doesn't lose.

The Clinton Machine didn't do so well back in '08 . .
 
The Clinton Machine didn't do so well back in '08 . .

She still parlayed that into a Secretary of State gig - so it didn't go all that bad for her either.

Actually on second thought, given that her performance in that role is what is allowing Trump to even have a chance in this race... maybe it didn't go that great for her.
 
She still parlayed that into a Secretary of State gig - so it didn't go all that bad for her either.

Actually on second thought, given that her performance in that role is what is allowing Trump to even have a chance in this race... maybe it didn't go that great for her.

She only bowed out in 08 because BO promised her a job. Just like she'll turn around and promise him one if he can rally the black vote for her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2
I'm disappointed in Bernie lately, but not surprised. They know politics game better than me... Thank God!

You can rest easy that the Oligarchy has everything well under control. No mishaps or mistakes, or tipping of the apple cart. It gets what it wants. And, in America, it gets it every time.
 
too many questions and then they wanted you to rate importance. I got to about the 5th one and said screw it.
 
Here's mine...... Okay wise-crackers, don't give me any lip! I mean it! LOL I do NOT want free stuff! I work very hard and take very good care of my myself, my home, my kids and don't need the government to help me! (some people do though and I am fine with helping!)
2401613879.jpg
Did you copy Strum's paper?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT