You would be incorrect on all counts. And you have nothing to be "grateful" for concerning how we played. UNC is and was the better team. What you should be grateful for is that Nova played over their heads in the tourney, but even that wasn't enough against UNC without egregious help of the striped variety. It is what it is. So enjoy your title... and stay on your own board with this utter nonsense.
gary-7,
Interesting perspective you have. So if I'm incorrect on all counts, that means UNC is not great team with quality people, didn't play very well, and doesn't have more talent? Way to diss your own team. Or do you just mean you disagree with SOME of my points?
Oddly enough, I do agree with you completely that 'Nova played over their heads. I thought of putting those exact words in my original post, but ended up not doing it. That's how they played at an unprecedented level.
As far as UNC being the better team, that is certainly debatable. Look at the standard analytics, which are not biased by fan interest.
_________________'Nova___________UNC
Pomeroy_________#1 (0.9633)____#2 (0.9522)
Sagarin__________#1 (94.26)______#3 (93.33)
BPI (before NCAAs)_#3 (88.8)______#1 (90.3)
RPI (before NCAAs)_#4 (0.6455)____#5 (0.6420)
Record___________35 - 5_________33 - 7
All but one of these metrics, which account for the whole season (not just one game), favor Villanova. I still wouldn't say that 'Nova is clearly the better team, but there's little to recommend the idea that UNC is better. Without question, though, 'Nova was the better team IN THE TOURNEY. Anyway, there's no shame in losing to the better team.
Finally, with regard to the referees, lots of calls get missed during the heat of the game. There's no reason to think those mistakes favored one side or the other, and any notion that the referees were out to get UNC is just, well..., that claim is not worthy of your team or your fan base.