And moving Kennedy up high would help to decongest the lane and open up driving lanes for our wings.
[Blue font] Seventh is nowhere near as good as Vince! What are you smoking?! [/Blue font]Welcome to the board. Enjoyed your post.
But nothing raises hackles and blows circuits in here more than comparing a recruit or player to a previous player. People cant grasp that you're not saying they're as good, justnplay similar roles or have similar styles. I compared seventh woods' game to vince carter's once....Dont remember a thing after that.
And moving Kennedy up high would help to decongest the lane and open up driving lanes for our wings.
OK I'll bite. We certainly need 2 shooters that are proficient out to 3pt depth. They don't have to be the 2G though. Name a team that has 3 3pt shooters not named Golden State. JB and JJ are perfectly capable of keeping the D honest which is all we need shooters to do. (JJ & TP prolly don't care who is called a 2) Theo at 2 adds slashing, length, D, rebounding,potential mid-range, and more playmaking. It is not conventional, but Roy doesn't feel the need to bow to convention if it keeps one of his 5 best off the floor!
KW. BRob, and 7th will all get the time needed to see who can step up, knock down their shots, D up, and provide that change of pace. None of them HAVE to take over though since I think we have it covered as is. When they are in, Theo can slide to 3 or 4 and teams will have to play entirely different D. This doesn't even account for Maye's potential shooting.
Meeks in the high post certainly SEEMS like a great idea, but we don't know if he, Isiah, or TB are particularly good at their part in it. A coach can't just insert something unless his peeps execute it well. This is why we can't suddenly start playing zone in the middle of a season!
Perhaps, perhaps not. And as I said, I want to see both of them taking the ball to the basket more often, not just settling for perimeter shots. Like Dave, I think we'll see a significant amount of zone defense this year, with defenses daring us to prove we can drain the trey.OK I'll bite. We certainly need 2 shooters that are proficient out to 3pt depth. They don't have to be the 2G though. JB and JJ are perfectly capable of keeping the D honest which is all we need shooters to do. (JJ & TP prolly don't care who is called a 2) Theo at 2 adds slashing, length, D, rebounding,potential mid-range, and more playmaking. It is not conventional, but Roy doesn't feel the need to bow to convention if it keeps one of his 5 best off the floor!
Can't hurt to try Kennedy in the high post, can it? He's struggled to finish through contact down low for 3 years, hasn't developed a hook shot to compensate for his lack of lift, and consistently establishes position so deep under the basket that it acts as another defender, causing him to lean back into the defender and making his shot very easy to block. He proved in high school that he is proficient at knocking down the 15-18 footer. He also established that he is a good passer for a big man. When you couple those factors with the additional space in the lane that would be provided by stationing him at the FT line, thereby creating more room for our forwards to slash to the basket, it makes a ton of sense to do so.Meeks in the high post certainly SEEMS like a great idea, but we don't know if he, Isiah, or TB are particularly good at their part in it. A coach can't just insert something unless his peeps execute it well. This is why we can't suddenly start playing zone in the middle of a season!
I really don't think we are actually disagreeing. And I hope teams zone us because I believe we have some devastating shooters this year and I'm including KW, Maye, and BRob + JB & JJ! I also think Meeks should be good in the high post, but Roy is too good a coach not to notice it too. Gotta be a reason it hasn't happened. Teams that back off Theo just give him a head of steam and he has a great midrange/distribution game! I don't see him as the hesitate or indecisive type.
Why do y'all think that Roy hasn't played a lot of high/low post?
ie. the cuse. That move took them to the woodshed last yearI think he has actually. I remember countless times Brice fed Kennedy/Hicks from the foul line/elbow. Then going back, I remember Henson/Zeller/Hans doing the same.
Didn't Roy have a great year at Kansas with Drew Gooden and Nick Collison playing high/low post too?I think he has actually. I remember countless times Brice fed Kennedy/Hicks from the foul line/elbow. Then going back, I remember Henson/Zeller/Hans doing the same.
We are blessed with several versatile players which indeed gives Roy many options regarding possible lineup combinations. Barring Kennedy showing that he's capable of playing 28-30 MPG, I really hope we'll see more small ball this year with Isaiah, Theo, JJ, player X, and Joel. It was very effective last year and I think could be again this year.That's what I see as well. The combinations he can put on the court are staggering. All of our peeps can run too and that can be devastating. It won't be long until peeps are complaining because Roy plays too many guys, but I think this year his rotations will be very fluid.
We have seen Roy use the high post before I agree, but I still think he sees more potential with Meeks closer to the basket for some reason. I was specifically talking about Meeks/Hicks/TB dynamics. Maybe it changes this season and maybe Meeks figures out how to use his body inside and explodes. I'm excited by the prospect either way.
I really don't think we are actually disagreeing. And I hope teams zone us because I believe we have some devastating shooters this year and I'm including KW, Maye, and BRob + JB & JJ! I also think Meeks should be good in the high post, but Roy is too good a coach not to notice it too. Gotta be a reason it hasn't happened. Teams that back off Theo just give him a head of steam and he has a great midrange/distribution game! I don't see him as the hesitate or indecisive type.
Why do y'all think that Roy hasn't played a lot of high/low post?
I couldn't agree more, Dave. I'm going to quit harping on it because it will have no bearing on Roy's game plan. But it is very frustrating to me.Well saw Brice doing a pretty good job last season on the high side, not that we don't run our version, just Brice tended to settle for the mid range jumpers. I want to see more high post pick and roll action, set that screen and roll directly down looking for the pass over the top, gimme some of that 2 man game action, some of that Stockton to Malone action! Meeks IMO has a great set of hands, I think he could be really work that well.
In the final game, it was readily apparent that Villanova had no answer for Brice whatsoever in the post. I kept hoping Roy would isolate Brice inside and keep dumping the ball down to him, Brice would have finished with 40 points and we would have won. I've seen a guy score 6-8 points in quick succession and get subbed for more times than I can remember during Roy's tenure, and quite a few times during Dean's tenure as well. Personally, I think you ride the hot hand until he cools off or the opposing team makes adjustments to stop him. Villanova had no one who could cover Brice. Yet Kennedy took only 2 less shots, despite going 1 for 8, and Paige took 17 shots. Not good game management.I agree to an extent, but I think we are seeing incremental changes in Roy's philosophy. He has been playing zone a bit, he has been experimenting with lineups, he has been showing different defensive sets and alternating between the scramble, switch on the perimeter, doubling down and across; zones (1-3-1, 3-2, 2-3, etc). He has tweaked our offense, but when you have Brice, it would be foolish not to make him the center piece. I bet this year, unless Hicks has a Brice-like explosion which is possible, we will see a more perimeter based O. We run a motion O off our secondary break and run our Freelance O and I don't see anything significant that is different between this and the Dribble Drive.
I'd also like to see Roy switch defenses a few times a game to keep offenses off balance. Not only was our zone effective on the few occasions we ran it last year, It could help with Isaiah's foul issues. I also think the small lineup could be an effective trapping team, something I'd like to see us spring on teams from time to time.
.
The thing about this is that they DID stop Brice by clogging the lane and forcing our guards to make perimeter plays and quit letting us play through our bigs. It doesn't matter how many times Brice scored the ball when he got it because the objective was to limit his touches and it worked...........In the final game, it was readily apparent that Villanova had no answer for Brice whatsoever in the post. I kept hoping Roy would isolate Brice inside and keep dumping the ball down to him, Brice would have finished with 40 points and we would have won. I've seen a guy score 6-8 points in quick succession and get subbed for more times than I can remember during Roy's tenure, and quite a few times during Dean's tenure as well. Personally, I think you ride the hot hand until he cools off or the opposing team makes adjustments to stop him. Villanova had no one who could cover Brice. Yet Kennedy took only 2 less shots, despite going 1 for 8, and Paige took 17 shots. Not good game management.
Ergo, why I said "isolate Brice down low" which is most easily done by spreading the court, thereby giving Brice room to take his man one on one. Teams do this all the time when they have a mismatch that the opposing team can't defend. We didn't make the changes necessary to continue to get the ball to our red hot player. I'm all for balanced scoring night in and night out, but when you have a hot horse, ride that sucker all the way to the finish line.The thing about this is that they DID stop Brice by clogging the lane and forcing our guards to make perimeter plays and quit letting us play through our bigs. It doesn't matter how many times Brice scored the ball when he got it because the objective was to limit his touches and it worked...........
Couldn't disagree more. We have every reason to believe that Joel, JJ, and Isaiah will all be good scorers, not merely decent scorers. And Kennedy was already a decent scorer, albeit in limited minutes. I think we'll score pretty readily, and I agree we'll be quite good defensively, something that will key our running game. Our back court, in particular, should be right up there with the best defensive back courts.I dont see any combinations that put more than two decent scorers together. Maybe some players will have massively improved and change that. I hope so cause i dont see a lot of scoring. I think it'll be one ofnthe better defensive teams we've seen in a while though.