They take >$600 from my check every time
One of the many pitfalls of unions.
I'm all for defined contribution pensions, it's the defined benefit ones that create problems (for everyone else). Not sure which one yours is.
They take >$600 from my check every time
I will get a % of my highest 3 years of pay. I can take a slightly lesser amount if I want my wife to receive benefits after I die.One of the many pitfalls of unions.
I'm all for defined contribution pensions, it's the defined benefit ones that create problems (for everyone else). Not sure which one yours is.
For the cumulative wealth and opportunity in this country, our education is shit relative to the world. Our cops are largely a joke. They are more concerned with writing tickets than policing communities. I’ve formed my views from personal experience and discussion with someone who was a Dallas SWAT officer."Less than good," which I think is a drastic underestimation, is a far cry from "shit results."
Quite the opposite. If I got offered more value (compensation, quality of life, etc.) elsewhere, I'd take it in a heartbeat, but I have the best I can find for my skills/experience/education.
That sounds miserable.
Sorry, but I choose not to settle for mediocrity. Worked my ass off to get where I am.
Just kidding. I married well and basically work less than 10 hours a week. @UNC71-00 and @heelz2345 can confirm this.That’s great, congrats.
I haven’t settled for mediocrity either. But I’m also not stupid enough to think I’m worth more than I am. They’re not mutually exclusive.
Just kidding. I married well and basically work less than 10 hours a week. @UNC71-00 and @heelz2345 can confirm this.
She got a sister? LOL.Just kidding. I married well and basically work less than 10 hours a week. @UNC71-00 and @heelz2345 can confirm this.
Just kidding. I married well and basically work less than 10 hours a week. @UNC71-00 and @heelz2345 can confirm this.
I can confirm this too. ElliotT’s wife is a smoke show. I get wet just thinking about her.Just kidding. I married well and basically work less than 10 hours a week. @UNC71-00 and @heelz2345 can confirm this.
You sound bitter, ticket. My guess is you are an unlawful student who plays with matches.For the cumulative wealth and opportunity in this country, our education is shit relative to the world. Our cops are largely a joke. They are more concerned with writing tickets than policing communities. I’ve formed my views from personal experience and discussion with someone who was a Dallas SWAT officer.
She got a sister? LOL.
I can confirm this too. ElliotT’s wife is a smoke show. I get wet just thinking about her.
You sound bitter, ticket. My guess is you are an unlawful student who plays with matches.
I'm not on your back, ticket. I'm just having trouble believing someone as intelligent as you honestly thinks "our education is shit" and "our cops are largely a joke," and that it's all because they are underpaid. I think it's pretty obvious that the majority of teachers and police officers and fire fighters in this country are in it for reasons other than the money.You sound like my mom. Get off my back already. Nothing wrong with a little fire, dammit.
I'm not on your back, ticket. I'm just having trouble believing someone as intelligent as you honestly thinks "our education is shit" and "our cops are largely a joke," and that it's all because they are underpaid. I think it's pretty obvious that the majority of teachers and police officers and fire fighters in this country are in it for reasons other than the money.
That's a real pretty graph you have there, ticket. Almost had me fooled into thinking all of us Americans are just a bunch of absentminded hayseeds with the least little bit of a clue.
I’m sorry the truth hurts. Maybe you should get out moreThat's a real pretty graph you have there, ticket. Almost had me fooled into thinking all of us Americans are just a bunch of absentminded hayseeds with the least little bit of a clue.
Listen, dude, I usually enjoy reading your stuff here but go ahead and tell me now if all I've got to look forward to is more of this nonsensical crap and I'll just skim right over the shit, eh?
Actually I need to slow down. I've been getting out too much lately, hence the drunken posts at three in the morning. I trust you realize I'm just messing. I disagree with you but the hysterics are only for fun.I’m sorry the truth hurts. Maybe you should get out more
I'm not sure what to make of your posts but congrats on the impending liver disease. Drinking in excess will ruin you. Moderation is the key to life.Actually I need to slow down. I've been getting out too much lately, hence the drunken posts at three in the morning. I trust you realize I'm just messing. I disagree with you but the hysterics are only for fun.
Believe it or not there are a lot of background checks, vetting, and ALOT that you must learn (2yrs worth) in a semester of school to be an officer. Close to 60% of applicants wash out (not all can keep up with the learning pace), or are removed from the pool during phsych evals. Pay for cops is not up to the state except for highway patrol. The salary for them starts out now at around 50,000. The salary for deputies and officers depends on where you live, and how much that city, town,or county are willing to pay their officers/deputies. For instance where I live so deputy now starts at 41,000. But that will different in a different county.I get what you are saying, but why do we pay so poorly for teachers and police officers? Those are two jobs where I think the qualifications and pay are ridiculously low. Being a teacher should be an honor in this country and a prized job. The qualifiers should be rigorous and pay compelling.
Likewise, becoming an office of the law should require a lot of education and testing. The pay should be much better. I have a friend who was a former Dallas SWAT that went on to join the Marine Corps and now works as in-house legal counsel. He has some great police stories and one thing he is adamant about is that a great cop can do the work of 10 average cops.
As long as we pay shit wages, we will get shit results.
Personally, I think an officer should be an attorney-lite. They should really understand the law and have the right mindset for the job. It’s crazy we let some of these idiots run around with a weapon and that kind of power.Believe it or not there are a lot of background checks, getting, and ALOT that you must learn (2yrs worth) in a semester of school to be an officer. Close to 60% of applicants wash out (not all can keep up with the learning pace), or are removed from the pool during phsych evals. Pay for cops is not up to the state except for highway patrol. The salary for them starts out now at around 50,000. The salary for deputies and officers depends on where you live, and how much that city, town,or county are willing to pay their officers/deputies. For instance where I live so deputy now starts at 41,000. But that will different in a different county.
Well I'll be damned. Not only was he right, but it was a teacher doing the raping:blames teachers for children being sexually assaulted, abused and introduced to drug use because teachers walked out of class....
Well I'll be damned. Not only was he right, but it was a teacher doing the raping:
An Oklahoma middle school teacher was arrested for raping one of her students multiple times — including before and after a teacher walkout at the state Capitol.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/cri...-raping-student-day-walkout-article-1.3926705
Here is the thing they pretty much are. Every year I get a new g.s. book for North Carolina. Laws change everyday so it's needed. I do agree that some idiots nned to have their badge and gun taken. But the process is pretty thorough and miticulous. Nothing is 100%Personally, I think an officer should be an attorney-lite. They should really understand the law and have the right mindset for the job. It’s crazy we let some of these idiots run around with a weapon and that kind of power.
What's scary as hell, ticket, is I put in my cop application last month and just found out this morning I've been accepted! I report to the academy a week from Thursday. Can't wait to be assigned a pistol AND a taser!!I'm not sure what to make of your posts but congrats on the impending liver disease. Drinking in excess will ruin you. Moderation is the key to life.
Or comedyWhat's scary as hell, ticket, is I put in my cop application last month and just found out this morning I've been accepted! I report to the academy a week from Thursday. Can't wait to be assigned a pistol AND a taser!!
If I bomb out at police work there's always teaching.
Are we listing the professions he would fail at?Or comedy
This is the poast of the thread.Your poast speaks to the issues. Administrations (and society in general) are too damn scared to publicly identify the problem. If there are kids that cause problems in class, they should be removed from class. We should spend less time on those that are not interested in learning so that those that are interested in learning can learn. But to do that, we'd have to get down to real talk. And administrations - mostly white administrators - are too scared to do that.
One of my staff members just had two kids graduate from high school in the last 3 years. Her daughter was a high achiever that was in all AP courses. That is until the school administration felt that the AP courses were not diverse enough. So they proceeded to lower the requirements for AP courses so that the classroom is more diverse. And those kids that were allowed into the class were not high achievers and not interested in performing at a high level. They were disruptive and caused my staff member's daughter to voluntarily leave the AP courses. She was able to get into the college prep courses where that element didn't exist. But there were other high achievers that weren't able to get into the college prep courses and they had to be stuck in the dumbed down AP courses. This is a large part of the problem.
We've become afraid to excel. Because naturally excelling makes those that don't or can't excel look bad. And for some reason, we don't want that. Instead of setting the bar high and attempting to raise up the bottom, we simply move the top down to close the gap. This is one of the biggest problems with public education and one of the biggest reasons my kids will never be publicly educated.
As to your point about Spanish speaking students - think about this. We have to spend money on extra resources for kids that don't speak English instead of just requiring all students in this country to speak English. Think about that.
For the record, just so everyone knows I'm not on a witch hunt, my mom was a public special ed teacher for 40 years and my sister is a public special ed teacher that works with kids with severe and multiple disabilities. She's been in teaching for 20 years. I love teachers. I understand they're in a bad spot. And I feel for them. @ticket2ride04 asks why we pay so little for teachers. I can't answer that. Should we pay more? Absolutely. But until society is ready to address the real problems - no matter how uncomfortable it may be - those teachers could make millions and little will change with regard to our results.
"All" is in that category for him.Are we listing the professions he would fail at?
The problem with this idea is in states like NC the extra funding would go straight to the county offices. The actual schools would never see a dime of it. They would create new positions to "help" the schools but the schools would see nada!This is the poast of the thread.
Also, I've long had an idea on how to somewhat rectify school resource inequality within a state. I know it seems a bit communist-y, but I've always felt instead of 100% funding public schools with county property taxes, a state-wide pool should be created. Set a mark that all counties are entitled to -- a mark that's high enough to make the poorest of the poor counties substantially better than they were, but make the mark low enough so that the rich counties can still reap the benefits of their high property taxes.
Example: take North Carolina. I have no idea what a realistic number is, but for argument's sake let's say Richmond and Scotland Counties (these are basically the poorest two counties in the state, for those who don't know) only receive $500,000 in funding from property taxes per year. Meanwhile, Mecklenburg County and Wake County public receive $10,000,000 in property tax funding. Set the bar at $1,500,000. All property tax from across the state is collected into a pool, and all 100 counties receive $1,500,000; then, once that happens, any county that generated more than that $1,500,000 keeps the rest for itself.
In this way, you'd raise the bar of the lowest-income (and thus I assume the worst public school systems) counties, while still keeping plenty of funding in the richest counties to keep those schools excellent. To make up the difference from what they used to get, the rich counties can either raise property tax slightly (hopefully no), OR they could appeal to wealthy parents to make modest donations to the county school system to bridge the gap. Hopefully, under my plan, the poorest counties would be able to go out and hire a handful of better qualified teachers with their new modest windfall, and will be able to raise their test scores a bit and as an overall result, improve the economic status / quality of life in that county, if educated kids eventually go back and decide to work in that county. And, if a county gets a reputation for great public schools, that makes it more attractive for businesses to locate there (especially if land is plentiful) as well as families to locate there.
It probably wouldn't work, but that's always been my idea of how to fix public schools. It would help raise teacher salaries, which capitalism says will convince more qualified candidates to apply. I recognize that it would be easier to adapt in a state like North Carolina that has several pockets of affluent areas than it would be to adapt it in a state like Mississippi.
This is the poast of the thread.
Also, I've long had an idea on how to somewhat rectify school resource inequality within a state. I know it seems a bit communist-y, but I've always felt instead of 100% funding public schools with county property taxes, a state-wide pool should be created. Set a mark that all counties are entitled to -- a mark that's high enough to make the poorest of the poor counties substantially better than they were, but make the mark low enough so that the rich counties can still reap the benefits of their high property taxes.
Example: take North Carolina. I have no idea what a realistic number is, but for argument's sake let's say Richmond and Scotland Counties (these are basically the poorest two counties in the state, for those who don't know) only receive $500,000 in funding from property taxes per year. Meanwhile, Mecklenburg County and Wake County public receive $10,000,000 in property tax funding. Set the bar at $1,500,000. All property tax from across the state is collected into a pool, and all 100 counties receive $1,500,000; then, once that happens, any county that generated more than that $1,500,000 keeps the rest for itself.
In this way, you'd raise the bar of the lowest-income (and thus I assume the worst public school systems) counties, while still keeping plenty of funding in the richest counties to keep those schools excellent. To make up the difference from what they used to get, the rich counties can either raise property tax slightly (hopefully no), OR they could appeal to wealthy parents to make modest donations to the county school system to bridge the gap. Hopefully, under my plan, the poorest counties would be able to go out and hire a handful of better qualified teachers with their new modest windfall, and will be able to raise their test scores a bit and as an overall result, improve the economic status / quality of life in that county, if educated kids eventually go back and decide to work in that county. And, if a county gets a reputation for great public schools, that makes it more attractive for businesses to locate there (especially if land is plentiful) as well as families to locate there.
It probably wouldn't work, but that's always been my idea of how to fix public schools. It would help raise teacher salaries, which capitalism says will convince more qualified candidates to apply. I recognize that it would be easier to adapt in a state like North Carolina that has several pockets of affluent areas than it would be to adapt it in a state like Mississippi.
You have your hands full working on your top-ten list of pickup lines for this weekend: "Hey, I'm a feminist, too," "You're pretty smart for a woman," "My exes are all crazy," "Wanna go to TGI Fridays for some sliders?" etc.Are we listing the professions he would fail at?
Are you a Democrat now?This is the poast of the thread.
Also, I've long had an idea on how to somewhat rectify school resource inequality within a state. I know it seems a bit communist-y, but I've always felt instead of 100% funding public schools with county property taxes, a state-wide pool should be created. Set a mark that all counties are entitled to -- a mark that's high enough to make the poorest of the poor counties substantially better than they were, but make the mark low enough so that the rich counties can still reap the benefits of their high property taxes.
Example: take North Carolina. I have no idea what a realistic number is, but for argument's sake let's say Richmond and Scotland Counties (these are basically the poorest two counties in the state, for those who don't know) only receive $500,000 in funding from property taxes per year. Meanwhile, Mecklenburg County and Wake County public receive $10,000,000 in property tax funding. Set the bar at $1,500,000. All property tax from across the state is collected into a pool, and all 100 counties receive $1,500,000; then, once that happens, any county that generated more than that $1,500,000 keeps the rest for itself.
In this way, you'd raise the bar of the lowest-income (and thus I assume the worst public school systems) counties, while still keeping plenty of funding in the richest counties to keep those schools excellent. To make up the difference from what they used to get, the rich counties can either raise property tax slightly (hopefully no), OR they could appeal to wealthy parents to make modest donations to the county school system to bridge the gap. Hopefully, under my plan, the poorest counties would be able to go out and hire a handful of better qualified teachers with their new modest windfall, and will be able to raise their test scores a bit and as an overall result, improve the economic status / quality of life in that county, if educated kids eventually go back and decide to work in that county. And, if a county gets a reputation for great public schools, that makes it more attractive for businesses to locate there (especially if land is plentiful) as well as families to locate there.
It probably wouldn't work, but that's always been my idea of how to fix public schools. It would help raise teacher salaries, which capitalism says will convince more qualified candidates to apply. I recognize that it would be easier to adapt in a state like North Carolina that has several pockets of affluent areas than it would be to adapt it in a state like Mississippi.
That's easy to do when you have 13 students in the state.We get no state aid out here. Omaha and Lincoln get all of it. We rely solely on county property taxes.
Keep up man, I'm married. @TarHeelNation11 is the desperate one that needs new pickup lines.You have your hands full working on your top-ten list of pickup lines for this weekend: "Hey, I'm a feminist, too," "You're pretty smart for a woman," "My exes are all crazy," "Wanna go to TGI Fridays for some sliders?" etc.
Please stop making my jokes less funny than they already are.Different state. Teacher needs to be terminated and student w/ parents needs therapy.
I know. That's who I'm talking about, pickup lines for your bride.Keep up man, I'm married.