Coach will give Kenny an opportunity at the 2. And I love the kid but it is incumbent on him to perform, guys looking for PT right behindya...
Coach will give Kenny an opportunity at the 2. And I love the kid but it is incumbent on him to perform, guys looking for PT right behindya...
Are you betting on a freshman starting over them? If so, I'm wondering if you've actually watched a RW coached them. If I'm misunderstanding your post, please enlighten me.Wouldn't bet on KW or CJ either one starting .. but there could be one helluva "Blue Team" coming off the bench.
Are you betting on a freshman starting over them? If so, I'm wondering if you've actually watched a RW coached them. If I'm misunderstanding your post, please enlighten me.
We'll see. To this point, I haven't seen RW start a freshman, unless he was basically forced to. He is fiercely loyal to his upperclassmen, which is one thing I love about him.Like many, you are misinformed. If the freshman is better, YES he will start.
We'll see. To this point, I haven't seen RW start a freshman, unless he was basically forced to. He is fiercely loyal to his upperclassmen, which is one thing I love about him.
No one is saying he never starts freshmen. It is just rare. You can easily make the argument Marvin, JB, Marshall, etc should have started on day one because they were more talented. All things being equal Roy starts upperclassmen instead of freshmen. That's why KW will more than likely start game one. He might not finish the year as the starter, but Roy will give him the chance. Especially considering how well he plays D. Roy loves nothing more than a player who works hard on D.Not attacking you, but the bolded quote didn't seem right with me so I dug a little to find some freshman starters:
- Both Justin and Theo ran out for the opening tip in their first official game (though it could be argued that Theo only got the start because Tokoto was disciplined)
- Nate started his first game, but you could say Roy was 'forced' cause of the PJ/Leslie fiasco.
- Marcus started his first game, even though Roy had Dex, Reggie, PJ and Leslie on the bench.
- Harrison Barnes started from day 1, Butter had to wait half a season but he too started as a frosh.
- Tyler Zeller started his first game... ok, yes Hansbrough was out and would have started if healthy (but that was 08-09, no frosh was busting that line-up)
- Brandon Wright played 28min and scored 10 points in his first freshman game.
- It could be argued Roy was 'forced' to start 3 frosh to open 05-06, but hey.... lets be honest, Psycho T would have started most years!
The poster I quoted said he'd never seen Roy start a freshman unless he was forced to.... in my examples above there were cases of Roy being 'forced' to, but also cases where talent got the start over experience.No one is saying he never starts freshmen. It is just rare.......
Are you betting on a freshman starting over them? If so, I'm wondering if you've actually watched a RW coached them. If I'm misunderstanding your post, please enlighten me.
All other things being equal, Roy will start the more experienced player. As he should. Experience wins titles, as is demonstrated almost every year.All things being equal Roy starts upperclassmen instead of freshmen. That's why KW will more than likely start game one. He might not finish the year as the starter, but Roy will give him the chance. Especially considering how well he plays D. Roy loves nothing more than a player who works hard on D.
If Kenny doesn't improve significantly on offense, he will lose PT, if not his starting spot. We can't afford minimal scoring from the SG spot next year.Just like I said. I wouldn't bet on either starting. We don't know how well KW will come back from his injury and we don't know how long it will take CJ to learn the system. And generally the upper class men start because they are more developed players in the Carolina system and are usually better overall players. I suspect Roy will start his best five regardless of class status and Jalek Felton may well be one of the best 5 when the ACC season starts if not already.
I'll dispute.I think the starters are Joel, Luke, Theo (those 3 I don't think anyone will dispute). I do think Kenny will start at the 2, Jalek may at some point win that role but I believe Kenny's shooting will strongly improve, as we should expect from a kid goinbg in to his Jr season and his defense is very strong. The other starter I think will be either Brooks or Huff, for now I would go with Huff being the stronger physical body but Brooks will get solid PT.
Sure we will see Theo and Cam (if cleared to play) on the floor together but I think Cam's primary role wil be backing Theo up at the 3. If you accept Luke starting then you have to pick between Theo and Cam to start at the for 2 important reasons.
First, Luke can play at the 4 but we really do not want to see Theo at the 4 and Luke at the 5, Theo at the 4 requires a big man like any of the frosh bigs to rim protect, Luke is a position defender, not a rim protector.
Second, when you have Kenny, Jalek, BRob, 7th, and Platek all looking for pt and Joel getting huge PG minutes you just can not afford to put Theo in at the 2 for many if any minutes. It was one thing when we had Justin at the 3, you had to start Justin so you had to find a place for Theo but Justin is no longer there and Theo is going back to his natural wing position. Cam will get solid PT behind Theo, Brob if Cam is not cleared to play for us next season.
I'll dispute.
I think Cam is in for sure with Joel and Theo. One of the freshman bigs will play the 5. Then Kenny/Luke/Jalek battle it out for the final spot. Maybe I'm wrong and Luke's got the 4 locked up though.
Maybe. But if Kenny is a better player than Luke (and I'm not saying he is) then why not role with Kenny/Cam/Theo at the 2-3-4 instead? Sacrifice a bit of rebounding for more athleticism and defensive versatility. On the other hand, if none of the freshman bigs are great rebounders extra rebounding prowess at the 4 would be huge.I may like that line up more but I can not even imagine Roy will not start Luke after the way he played in the NCAAT.
I think there is no question that Cam is better than Kenny at this point (and more experienced). Kenny would have to take a big leap to outperform Cam.1. Berry
2. Williams
3. Pinson
4. Maye
5. Brooks
Starting five right there. But who knows for how long.
Roy I think will show his loyalty to the guys he recruited to Chapel Hill. I just don't think it last all seasonI think there is no question that Cam is better than Kenny at this point (and more experienced). Kenny would have to take a big leap to outperform Cam.
Well, he recruited Cam to Chapel Hill.Roy I think will show his loyalty to the guys he recruited to Chapel Hill. I just don't think it last all season
Had a bunch that would be brought up. Was Britt a better player than the guys behind him when he started?Well, he recruited Cam to Chapel Hill.![]()
I don't know, I wasn't a fan back then. Have only followed the team the last two years. Given Britt's career arc I doubt it.Had a bunch that would be brought up. Was Britt a better player than the guys behind him when he started?
Stilman White would have been a better option IMOI don't know, I wasn't a fan back then. Have only followed the team the last two years. Given Britt's career arc I doubt it.
My sense is that Cam will definitely start. Can't wait to find out though!
I think where Kenny has the advantage here is on the defensive side of the ball. Freshman typically struggle a tad from the get go w rotations etc. Hasn't one of the criticisms on Felton been he doesn't always play hard? It won't matter to Roy if Felton is more of a threat on offense than Kenny if he's taking plays off on the defensive half of the ball. I also think you will see a much improved Kenny on the offensive side. I hope to see him attack the rim more this season.Like many, you are misinformed. If the freshman is better, YES he will start.
Insert Brooks for Manley and you may have it. The lineup that excites me the most is:With the addition of Mr. Johnson today, I see our starting 5 next season as:
Berry
Johnson
Pinson
Maye
Manley
Tarrrrrrr
Insert Brooks for Manley and you may have it. The lineup that excites me the most is:
Joel
Jalek
Cameron
Theo
Brooks
HST, I fully expect Kenny to start initially. But if his offense isn't much improved, Jalek will supplant him.
Heeeeeeeeeeeeelllsss . . . !
Scott, I don't think Brooks starts at the 5 . . I see him backing up Maye at the 4 at season's beginning. I will be surprised if Manley is not starting . . (imho)
Yeah I'll agree that this lineup looks electric . .
Joel
Jalek
Cameron
Theo
Brooks
No one is saying he never starts freshmen. It is just rare. You can easily make the argument Marvin, JB, Marshall, etc should have started on day one because they were more talented. All things being equal Roy starts upperclassmen instead of freshmen. That's why KW will more than likely start game one. He might not finish the year as the starter, but Roy will give him the chance. Especially considering how well he plays D. Roy loves nothing more than a player who works hard on D.
FWIW, I'm not a he, but no big deal. Obviously, I should have chosen my words more carefully, but I've been watching the Heels a few decades & know Roy will start freshman. That just doesn't appear to be his first choice. He definitely doesn't seem to be like Cal & K, who purposely recruit over his players on a regular basis, but I'm fine with others disagreeing with me on that.The poster I quoted said he'd never seen Roy start a freshman unless he was forced to.... in my examples above there were cases of Roy being 'forced' to, but also cases where talent got the start over experience.
I do agree, Marvin could have started over Jawad, Joel probably should have started instead of JP and Butter most definitely should have started.
I reckon the 2-spot is wide open enough for Jalek to take the start with great practice in the preseason.
Fair enough, and I agree on both your above points. Roy is loyal to upperclassmen, but has a track record of starting frosh both when needed and when they deserve it (Barnes, Jackson, Hansbrough)FWIW, I'm not a he, but no big deal. Obviously, I should have chosen my words more carefully, but I've been watching the Heels a few decades & know Roy will start freshman. That just doesn't appear to be his first choice. He definitely doesn't seem to be like Cal & K, who purposely recruit over his players on a regular basis, but I'm fine with others disagreeing with me on that.
No worries. It's an easy assumption to make.Fair enough, and I agree on both your above points. Roy is loyal to upperclassmen, but has a track record of starting frosh both when needed and when they deserve it (Barnes, Jackson, Hansbrough)
Sorry about the 'He' there's a heap of testosterone on this board from time to time and it's an easy (and obviously incorrect) assumption that most posters are guys.
Historically, my sense is that Roy is comfortable starting one freshman (if he is good enough) but rarely seems comfortable starting 2. So, for example, Justin started as a frosh, but it took Joel until the very end of the season to push into the starting role. Barnes started but it took half the season before Kendall got the reins (and probably would have taken longer if not for problems with the guy he replaced). I might be forgetting someone but I think you have to go back to Lawson and Ellington to find Roy happy to start 2 frosh out of the gate.Like many, you are misinformed. If the freshman is better, YES he will start.