Anyone notice what's missing...
http://3qh929iorux3fdpl532k03kg.wpe.../2016/04/NOA_Amended_042516_NorthCarolina.pdf
http://3qh929iorux3fdpl532k03kg.wpe.../2016/04/NOA_Amended_042516_NorthCarolina.pdf
Anyone notice what's missing...
http://3qh929iorux3fdpl532k03kg.wpe.../2016/04/NOA_Amended_042516_NorthCarolina.pdf
I'd like to buy a round for UNC's lawyers . .
Roy just got 3 commitments!
I'm buying the bar out!!...man, wish this could have been the cherry on top of the championship!!..but this will due!!..thank you..on to recruiting!!I'll buy 2nd round!
Crack ride claiming this is in addition to. I gues they cant understand amended vs apended
I'm a little confused. The original NOA (at least in my reading) was much more damning to the MBB and FB programs. How does additional violations sent by UNC in the fall = a much more favorable NOA now? Did the additional findings reported by UNC also include challenges to the ONOA? I'm not complaining but I am confused.
CC
I am also confused as to whether or not the original charges were dropped or these new NOA are just added on to the original.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/amended
Amended: to alter, modify, rephrase, or add to or subtract from
Color me still worried.
CC
I am also confused as to whether or not the original charges were dropped or these new NOA are just added on to the original.
I am also confused as to whether or not the original charges were dropped or these new NOA are just added on to the original.
Exactly, which is what those of us who had a clue were saying from the day we first saw that silly allegation. The original extra benefits charge was a piece of contorted verbal gymnastics worthy of Olga Korbut. I'm sure UNC's legal types flagged that one and let the NCAA know how far that was gonna fly pretty quick. Makes ya wonder if the self-reporting of the additional violations served the dual purpose of firing a shot across their bow as to how UNC was gonna react to the overreach in the original... hmm?As Bilas tweeted....the NCAA knew it had no case and dropped the improper benefits charges.
No MBB mentions...
No Impermissible Benefits charge...
I think we are going to have a much easier time getting players ranked 15-30. Hopefully Bamba sees the benefit of starting as a freshman at the PF position, which would prove Roy is "OAD friendly" and would allow UNC to get that one key OAD player when a starting position is open. Plugging in a OAD at the wing to replace Bullock after he left would have greatly improved that year's team for example.I really hope that now we can go back to getting big time recruits again.
Also, don't underestimate the effect this may have with an even higher rated '17 Big......I think we are going to have a much easier time getting players ranked 15-30. Hopefully Bamba sees the benefit of starting as a freshman at the PF position, which would prove Roy is "OAD friendly" and would allow UNC to get that one key OAD player when a starting position is open. Plugging in a OAD at the wing to replace Bullock after he left would have greatly improved that year's team for example.
Also, don't underestimate the effect this may have with an even higher rated '17 Big......