ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

Oh f**k you. This is exactly what I knew would happen.

You wanted me to provide fully explained evidence of what this goddamn, sorry ass right wing movement is doing to this country’s election process. Here it is. Watch the video. You f**king asked for links. Don’t act like you didn’t. This is the damage right here. You support a man who openly shirks and mocks rule of law while also proclaiming to represent it.

Better yet, why don’t you go on another one of your pointless, long winded rants about how democrats and liberal values are destroying the country and MAGA isn’t that bad while completely ignoring your own hubris.

F**k MAGA. I want a country not a backwards right wing theocracy, subverting the election process.
Let's get Ben Shapiro's objective perspective first.
 
Oh f**k you. This is exactly what I knew would happen.

You wanted me to provide fully explained evidence of what this goddamn, sorry ass right wing movement is doing to this country’s election process. Here it is. Watch the video. You f**king asked for links. Don’t act like you didn’t. This is the damage right here. You support a man who openly shirks and mocks rule of law while also proclaiming to represent it.

Better yet, why don’t you go on another one of your pointless, long winded rants about how democrats and liberal values are destroying the country and MAGA isn’t that bad while completely ignoring your own hubris.

F**k MAGA. I want a country not a backwards right wing theocracy, subverting the election process.
NO, you fvcking moron, I did not ask for, nor do I want, links. I asked for examples. If you can't tell me in your own words what the 'immense damage' is that YOU have referred to, you are just another yapping liberal gasbag....which of course you are.

Meanwhile, I challenge you to quote me asking for links. I'll be waiting. Hell, I'm going to be waiting again anyway it looks like.
 
Last edited:
Let's get Ben Shapiro's objective perspective first.
lol, yeah that truth perspective is about as objective as it gets. I guess you're used to spreading a different kind of perspective.

The floor is yours though if you want to factually demonstrate a Ben Shapiro bias.
 
lol, yeah that truth perspective is about as objective as it gets. I guess you're used to spreading a different kind of perspective.

The floor is yours though if you want to factually demonstrate a Ben Shapiro bias.
It's his biased opinion, like every biased political-shill personality whose entire livelihood demands a continuously-biased perspective so they can feed themselves and their family.
 
Policy matters. Here is just one example of the way in which it can be implemented and used to reshape things to one's vision of how it ought to be. Incidentally, this type of thing is an example of my fear of how much worse things could get if Grandpa were to take a publicly released cognitive test.

 
  • Angry
Reactions: Archer2
Policy matters. Here is just one example of the way in which it can be implemented and used to reshape things to one's vision of how it ought to be. Incidentally, this type of thing is an example of my fear of how much worse things could get if Grandpa were to take a publicly released cognitive test.


'Equity' is more woke garbage and I'm physically cringing the VP is engaging in it.

By the way, giving resources predominantly to 'communities of color' is not equity. It's racially based favoritism/encouraging victimhood rooted in bullshit anti racist clowns like Kendi.
 
It's his biased opinion, like every biased political-shill personality whose entire livelihood demands a continuously-biased perspective so they can feed themselves and their family.
well that's YOUR biased opinion.

giphy.gif
 
'Equity' is more woke garbage and I'm physically cringing the VP is engaging in it.

By the way, giving resources predominantly to 'communities of color' is not equity. It's racially based favoritism/encouraging victimhood rooted in bullshit anti racist clowns like Kendi.

And you, more so than others, are empowering those morons.
 
To all the orangeman trolls who like to pretend he invented the scam of election challenges, there is Example A (and a very big example at that). Stacey Abrams lost the GA governor's race in 2018 and immediately started the rhetoric about a stolen election. She even went to court to challenge it. After three years of litigation, on Friday, a judge appointed by Obama found that nothing raised in the lawsuit violated the constitution or the Voting Rights Act. Here are some tweets about it, the most incredible being Abrams herself. She still doesn't admit she was wrong despite the ruling from someone who should be in her corner.

 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
To all the orangeman trolls who like to pretend he invented the scam of election challenges, there is Example A (and a very big example at that). Stacey Abrams lost the GA governor's race in 2018 and immediately started the rhetoric about a stolen election. She even went to court to challenge it. After three years of litigation, on Friday, a judge appointed by Obama found that nothing raised in the lawsuit violated the constitution or the Voting Rights Act. Here are some tweets about it, the most incredible being Abrams herself. She still doesn't admit she was wrong despite the ruling from someone who should be in her corner.


Yeah but this is selective whataboutism. This is one democratic politician who is arguing against election restrictions and she lost. And while I’m no fan of Stacie Abrams, it’s the same thing as Donald Trump and his lackeys sowing discord in the election process while also running on it as a platform.
 
It's his biased opinion, like every biased political-shill personality whose entire livelihood demands a continuously-biased perspective so they can feed themselves and their family.
look at the bias he exhibits here. He is biased toward common sense and reality, things that you seem to have a bias against.

 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
Nothing screams common sense and reality like thinking that you'll be sent to some alternate dimension to be tortured for eternity for eating shellfish or the wrong kind of hot dog.
 
Nothing screams common sense and reality like thinking that you'll be sent to some alternate dimension to be tortured for eternity for eating shellfish or the wrong kind of hot dog.
Actually, I don't think the Hebrews believe in eternal damnation in the same sense as a lot of Catholic and Protestant beliefs. That's one of the benefits of these ideologies...you can make it up, or even change it after you make it up, to fit your own personal preference along the way.

Ben is one of those chosen people who is really committed to the yarmulke thing.
 
Actually, I don't think the Hebrews believe in eternal damnation in the same sense as a lot of Catholic and Protestant beliefs. That's one of the benefits of these ideologies...you can make it up, or even change it after you make it up, to fit your own personal preference along the way.

Ben is one of those chosen people who is really committed to the yarmulke thing.

Okay fine, 12 months of torture for eating the wrong kind of hot dog (double entendre intended).
 
Yeah but this is selective whataboutism. This is one democratic politician who is arguing against election restrictions and she lost. And while I’m no fan of Stacie Abrams, it’s the same thing as Donald Trump and his lackeys sowing discord in the election process while also running on it as a platform.
Except the hard evidence and proof of the election being stolen from Trump is quite plain for anyone to see, AND we have 140 or so years of history showing democrat party reliance on election fraud.

What do you think Jim Crow was about, for example? Or Tammany Hall?

Now democrats have managed to dominate the federal work-force and top positions at federal agencies and the few Republicans are often democrat allies, and so they use the federal government now to enforce election fraud just as they used state and city governments before that.
 
This is the same guy who gave FDR an 'F' for his Presidency and considers homosexuality to be a mental disorder. Oh, yeah. That's objective right there.
you might not be aware that a hell of a lot of people give FDR a low grade as president, especially those who educate themselves objectively about his presidency; that is, they bother to dig up facts in favor of latching on to whatever opinion aligns with their place on the political spectrum.

And homosexuality is an abnormality in the true sense of the word; whether it's considered a mental disorder or not isn't a matter of objectivity, it's a matter of opinion....you know, those things that psychiatrists and psychologists express. Professional opinions involving psychology and psychiatry are susceptible to changing social mores. That is subjectivity, not objectivity. What was once understood to be a mental disorder became generally thought by the headshrink community to be a mere variant of normal sexuality as homosexuality became more socially acceptable. To some, social acceptability is no way to judge a mental condition or a sexual behavior in a clinical sense. That's an objective view..

Because you apparently have a different opinion on some things, you consider yourself to be a judge of objectivity while those not in agreement with you are not. Got it. The funny part is that you're probably the least objective poster here and you don't even know it.

I myself don't think that homosexuality is necessarily a mental disorder, although in some cases it may very well be just that. But that's my opinion. There are other opinions that I objectively hold to be just as valid as mine.
 
Last edited:

And this is what voting for anti abortion extremists gets you.

"And this is what voting for anti abortion extremists gets you."


from your article...

" Which is why there was so much anxiety for the 24 hours between being denied until finally getting the prescription approved. "

The hysteria is strong in you.
 
Yeah but this is selective whataboutism. This is one democratic politician who is arguing against election restrictions and she lost. And while I’m no fan of Stacie Abrams, it’s the same thing as Donald Trump and his lackeys sowing discord in the election process while also running on it as a platform.
This is false. It's not selective whataboutism. First, it was absolutely timely and relevant as the news I was referencing had occurred on Friday (Abrams had just lost on all fronts in her legal challenge). Second, that election and subsequent bitching about same happened prior to trump's meltdown and temper tantrums (as did Hilary in 2016). Thus, my point that all the whiners should stop acting like orangeman was the first and only ego to lose an election that couldn't accept it and sought to legally challenge it. In other words, he didn't invent the behavior so posters should stop acting like he did. This has kinda been SOP for awhile now, particularly with those that have an inclination to run again or, at a minimum, make bank off of it.
 

And this is what voting for anti abortion extremists gets you.
The fact it had to be denied in the first place is ominous enough.
But the headline and your comments are untrue. IT WAS NEVER DENIED and should not be characterized that way. The article clearly says that it was DELAYED for 24 hours. The time was surely used and needed to confirm that the medication was being used for a legitimate, medically needed purpose other than for abortion. I have made it known in these same pages that I am pro-choice, but misstating actual events and specific facts in an attempt to exemplify an agenda driven narrative does not help.

In this instance, I suspect that the patient didn't even have an actual delay in taking the med. That is, it never says that she was out of the medication and needed it immediately or she'd suffer accordingly. I myself have had many occasions when a pharmacy couldn't provide a medication until the next day as they had to get it delivered from somewhere else, etc. For all appearances, this appears to be a 24 hour delay in delivery or fulfillment, not a denial and it never was. No need for the tv station or anyone else to go all boogieman on it about what could have happened.
 
The fact it had to be denied in the first place is ominous enough.
oh yeah, the ominosity was overwhelming and the outrage of having to wait a day to have a prescription filled is just third world kind of shit. It's unbelievable. Our democracy is hanging by a thread. The damage is immense.

I can only hope that the people involved....and you....manage to survive this ordeal and go on to have many more angst-filled days to go batshit over.

lol, what a pile of dogshit. You are quite the drama queen, aren't you?
 
This is false. It's not selective whataboutism. First, it was absolutely timely and relevant as the news I was referencing had occurred on Friday (Abrams had just lost on all fronts in her legal challenge). Second, that election and subsequent bitching about same happened prior to trump's meltdown and temper tantrums (as did Hilary in 2016). Thus, my point that all the whiners should stop acting like orangeman was the first and only ego to lose an election that couldn't accept it and sought to legally challenge it. In other words, he didn't invent the behavior so posters should stop acting like he did. This has kinda been SOP for awhile now, particularly with those that have an inclination to run again or, at a minimum, make bank off of it.

Even if, technically, Trump was not the first to challenge an election, he was the first to not only take it as far as he did, but make it an integral part of the platform for a major political party. That's my point.

Stacie Abrams was not trying to overturn the results of her loss in 2018. She was challenging rules she saw as restrictive to voting in general. And she lost. You can claim I'm splitting hairs, but to me, that's far less dangerous than what Trump did and continues to do as kingmaker in the GOP. It's become a doctrine. And that is why he should never ever be in office again. The less Trumpian politics in this country, the better.

oh yeah, the ominosity was overwhelming and the outrage of having to wait a day to have a prescription filled is just third world kind of shit. It's unbelievable. Our democracy is hanging by a thread. The damage is immense.

I can only hope that the people involved....and you....manage to survive this ordeal and go on to have many more angst-filled days to go batshit over.

lol, what a pile of dogshit. You are quite the drama queen, aren't you?

Hey, I'll own it. I overreacted. That doesn't mean the abortion laws that exist in states like Arizona and Ohio can't or haven't caused problems. See that 10 year old. Right wingers loved claiming how fake that was...until it wasn't.
 

And this is what voting for anti abortion extremists gets you.
sad story, but i'll still side with the MILLIONS of kids who were never given a chance to experience life thanks to pro-choice extremists.
 
Even if, technically, Trump was not the first to challenge an election, he was the first to not only take it as far as he did, but make it an integral part of the platform for a major political party. That's my point.

Stacie Abrams was not trying to overturn the results of her loss in 2018. She was challenging rules she saw as restrictive to voting in general. And she lost. You can claim I'm splitting hairs, but to me, that's far less dangerous than what Trump did and continues to do as kingmaker in the GOP. It's become a doctrine. And that is why he should never ever be in office again. The less Trumpian politics in this country, the better.



Hey, I'll own it. I overreacted. That doesn't mean the abortion laws that exist in states like Arizona and Ohio can't or haven't caused problems. See that 10 year old. Right wingers loved claiming how fake that was...until it wasn't.
Republicans didn't really care about abortion until the church people took it over.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT