So it is possible to get pregnant if you dont have sex?
Suggesting that people should only have sex when they intend to have children is probably the stupidest possible solution you could propose in this discussion.
So it is possible to get pregnant if you dont have sex?
Can't refute the meme so you engage in name-calling and foul language. Just like your mama and Jesus taught you, I'm sure. Good boy.Where do you swine find these asinine memes?
The human lives at stake are going to grow up to be welfare recipients and Democrat voters. Exactly what we need more of in this country.why would you want to ban liver transplants? 100% of abortions wouldn't be questioned if a human life wasn't at stake. If a human life wasn't at stake, I couldn't care less if you stuck a coathanger in your cooter three times a day, every day.
I don't think you understand. How can a woman exercise her right to choose if she has to choose not to choose that which might result in a choice for her to make?So it is possible to get pregnant if you dont have sex?
Run along swine, you need to go find more stupid memes.Can't refute the meme so you engage in name-calling and foul language. Just like your mama and Jesus taught you, I'm sure. Good boy.
the stupidest suggestion was that birth control should be rejected as a solution to irresponsible use of abortion as birth control, because it fails to work maybe one percent of the time. Just forget about birth control and keep those abortions coming I guess.Suggesting that people should only have sex when they intend to have children is probably the stupidest possible solution you could propose in this discussion.
what we need more of, desperately, are more humans that value human life. Although you are very possibly correct, what we don't need is to terminate human life because of what it might turn out to be. We're already approaching the dystopian democrat state, no need to rush it.The human lives at stake are going to grow up to be welfare recipients and Democrat voters. Exactly what we need more of in this country.
You do pose a challenge. I struggle to find a meme stupid enough for you.Run along swine, you need to go find more stupid memes.
Suggesting that people should only have sex when they intend to have children is probably the stupidest possible solution you could propose in this discussion.
If Sweden and Norway and several others can make it work, why are you so sure America can't?"Those that do not know history are doomed to repeat it."
The stupid leftists that think socialism will work if the US tries it...
the stupidest suggestion was that birth control should be rejected as a solution to irresponsible use of abortion as birth control, because it fails to work maybe one percent of the time. Just forget about birth control and keep those abortions coming I guess.
Love this. It's never about what's fair or anyone's fair share, it's about appealing to the masses and making them into victims of the rich. And, of course, there is no rationality or logic to this claim at the outset. First, they pay the bulk of the monies contrary to the implication. Second, they pay exactly what they are supposed to pay under the existing tax codes, regardless of political viewpoint.
So you have sex
foul language? 'Asinine' isn't foul language. Maybe you think he misspelled 'assinine', a non-existent word. He didn't. I won't argue your point about name-calling, although I think overreactions to name-calling are overrated.Can't refute the meme so you engage in name-calling and foul language. Just like your mama and Jesus taught you, I'm sure. Good boy.
the stupidest suggestion was that birth control should be rejected as a solution to irresponsible use of abortion as birth control, because it fails to work maybe one percent of the time. Just forget about birth control and keep those abortions coming I guess.
Last I knew you could move to Sweden and Norway.If Sweden and Norway and several others can make it work, why are you so sure America can't?
Then again, you might be right . . . people like you live here, after all.
so you think the woman at the rally was protesting because there was a one percent chance that birth control would fail? That the chances of her receiving her education hinge on whether abortion is available?Except… nobody suggested that.
a little education for you.If Sweden and Norway and several others can make it work, why are you so sure America can't?
Then again, you might be right . . . people like you live here, after all.
Guy I know had a big party at his church last night to celebrate the SC’ ruling. He is in his late 20’s and him and his wife already have 4 children. They have been on welfare and food stamps their whole marriage. Both are big Trump supporters….The human lives at stake are going to grow up to be welfare recipients and Democrat voters. Exactly what we need more of in this country.
Guy I know had a big party at his church last night to celebrate the SC’ ruling. He is in his late 20’s and him and his wife already have 4 children. They have been on welfare and food stamps their whole marriage. Both are big Trump supporters….
I was just in Norway, it is 98% white vikings with a common work ethic and culture. They are willing to pay high taxes and live mediocre lives because they are well brainwashed.If Sweden and Norway and several others can make it work, why are you so sure America can't?
Then again, you might be right . . . people like you live here, after all.
the same reason the woman was at the rally from your previous post. It has nothing much to do with abortion or anything else in particular, and much more to do any perceived infringement on a woman's entitlements. When women feel their status threatened, they'll form a mob, much like the defensive circle of a herd of muskox. It doesn't have to make sense for them to do so.![]()
WNBA players react to Supreme Court abortion ruling
The Supreme Court on Friday ended constitutional protections for abortion that had stood in America for nearly 50 years. The decision by the court’s conservative majority overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling.www.ajc.com
So why is a bunch of lesbos concerned about not being able to have an abortion?
and the poster above, who doesn't know shit from Shinola, celebrates any imagined victory by any convenient enemy of our country.It's 9:30 in the morning in Beijing and the victory party continues:
![]()
the same reason the woman was at the rally from your previous post. It has nothing much to do with abortion or anything else in particular, and much more to do any perceived infringement on a woman's entitlements. When women feel their status threatened, they'll form a mob, much like the defensive circle of a herd of muskox. It doesn't have to make sense for them to do so.
and @Heels Noir loaded up his diaper.Uh-oh, Trump blinked
guy I know had an abortion. Said you wouldn't believe how painful it was. I don't know whether he is on welfare and food stamps, but maybe I can find out. His wife has two large but different size breasts. She once took first and third place in a wet t-shirt contest.Guy I know had a big party at his church last night to celebrate the SC’ ruling. He is in his late 20’s and him and his wife already have 4 children. They have been on welfare and food stamps their whole marriage. Both are big Trump supporters….
Ask your mom for help.You do pose a challenge. I struggle to find a meme stupid enough for you.
Maybe some day.
Wow! That would really hurt if I gave 2 shits what you think.
So you will have to pay more on Amazon for your blow up doll....Uh-oh, Trump blinked
In another case of the artless deal, Donald Trump succumbed today to the notorious Chinese torture chamber. After initially raising the tariff on goods from China in February to 10%, and later to an astronomical 145%, Trump has agreed to end the stupidity and bring that number down to 30%. That's still quite a bit higher than it was when he came into office but considerably lower than what it was yesterday.
Nevertheless, this 30% tariff -- or let's call it what it is -- this 30% tax on Americans was unnecessary to begin with and it now leaves Trump defeated and wallowing in Xi's shadow. Way to go, Donnie!
![]()
It's always been perfectly clear that 99% of the time, you don't know WTF you're talking about.It's becoming more clear to me that 99% of the people for abortion are just lazy P.O.S. people that dont want to take any responsibility for anything.
Other than another opportunity to use a stupid pic, meme, gif, etc., or enlarging your font size, exactly how specifically does this leave "Trump defeated and wallowing", pray tell?now leaves Trump defeated and wallowing in Xi's shadow
Wow! That would really hurt if I gave 2 shits what you think.
You forgot the caption that went with the photo: "Hey Xi, look at my impression of this guy named Noir".
so you think the woman at the rally was protesting because there was a one percent chance that birth control would fail? That the chances of her receiving her education hinge on whether abortion is available?
He places women in the highest esteem.Do you seriously think the women at a pro choice rally are against using birth control?… lol
while ours stopped at 30%, according to what I read. Liblogic AND liblies.China dropped tariffs to 10% and Trump folded, liberal logic.
Guy I know had a big party at his church last night to celebrate the SC’ ruling. He is in his late 20’s and him and his wife already have 4 children. They have been on welfare and food stamps their whole marriage. Both are big Trump supporters….
Wow! That would really hurt if I gave 2 shits what you think.
What exactly are you saying is illogical or a lie? The only person lying to you is yourself.while ours stopped at 30%, according to what I read. Liblogic AND liblies.
YepSo you are saying that roughly 6 hours after the announcement this "guy you know" was able to organize a party at a church and had a bunch of people show up?
So you are saying that roughly 6 hours after the announcement this "guy you know" was able to organize a party at a church and had a bunch of people show up?
the liblogic is all over the place. Take your pick. I would go with that which was already pointed out, that Trump 'succumbed' to blah blah blah, when in fact his reduced tariff rate is at this point higher than China's. Just because Trump reduced his from what they were doesn't indicate anything other than that he reduced his from what they were, as part of the ongoing back-and-forth with China. Of course, try-too-hard libtools like you try to make that sound like we surrendered the WH to the Chinese.What exactly are you saying is illogical or a lie? The only person lying to you is yourself.
From my post above:
Trump has agreed to end the stupidity and bring that number down to 30%. That's still quite a bit higher than it was when he came into office but considerably lower than what it was yesterday (145%).
Nevertheless, this 30% tariff -- or let's call it what it is -- this 30% tax on Americans was unnecessary to begin with . . .
I'd bet that there were a great many of them last night.So you are saying that roughly 6 hours after the announcement this "guy you know" was able to organize a party at a church and had a bunch of people show up?
And you think THAT spells victory for Donald Trump? It sure as hell doesn't spell victory for American consumers who will be paying an additional 30% tax on all goods purchased in this country that come from China. It's safe to assume that America as a whole would prefer the 10% tax we had BEFORE Trump came back into office.the liblogic is all over the place. Take your pick. I would go with that which was already pointed out, that Trump 'succumbed' to blah blah blah, when in fact his reduced tariff rate is at this point higher than China's.
I'm not distorting the facts and you know it. I routinely use legitimate sources and always share the links. You're only comeback from the unfortunate truth is to make claims that either I am lying or, like this, that I am distorting the facts. You poor thing. Life must suck for dumb, spineless people like you.The only thing we can bank on is that dorks like you will gleefully piss their pants every time an opportunity to distort reality comes along.
They can't have a juggalo walking around at a pro life party. It might make people reconsider their views on abortion
well, THAT might very well be, but I didn't say so. YOU indicated it spelled defeat, yet present nothing other than opinion disguised as fact to try to make that seem to be the case. That's what I called you on. I said no one knows how this will all eventually shake out, and I said so because you are trying to indicate that Trump has already been defeated.And you think THAT spells victory for Donald Trump?
I'm not distorting the facts and you know it. I routinely use legitimate sources and always share the links. You're only comeback from the unfortunate truth is to make claims that either I am lying or, like this, that I am distorting the facts.
It's safe to assume that America as a whole would prefer the 10% tax we had BEFORE Trump came back into office.
They're not calling this the Trump tariff retreat for nothing.
you don't say. I can hardly believe it. OK, that does it. China and Heels Noir say they won, so I guess that's that. LMAO.China sees the agreement as a big win for Beijing
You've mixed him up with @chickenhunterJust because you never get invited to parties doesn't mean they aren't happening.
They can't have a juggalo walking around at a pro life party. It might make people reconsider their views on abortion.
I'd bet that there were a great many of them last night.
And, fact is that 99% were spur of the moment.
Funny isn't it, a woman's right to chose, yet so many marching to that will not define what a woman is? How can a woman have a right to chose if we don't know what one is?
My body my choice, fine as long as we are not talking about another body riding along with you, then who choses for it? You have a choice, all "birth givers" have a choice, have sex without contraception or not. Realize the potential out comes of your choices.
My body my choice, yeah but what if your mother had chose to abort you, does your life mean so little? How many great minds, minds that may have revolutionary changed this world for the better ended up aborted?
A doctor that does abortions is by definition a serial killer but rather than arrest him many want to insure he continues on and they would prefer he be funded for his efforts by the government?
Woman's right to chose, cool, chose not to have sex until marriage, chose condoms, chose the pill, chose the shot, chose the day after pill, don't chose murder and above all things do not chose to murder a child.
There are many that want the abortion option available all the way up to day of delivery and some idiots feel even after the child is born that the life may still be terminated??? That is a complete lack of morality, a shameful state that is even being discussed. The democrats would allow late term abortions tomorrow if they could get it passed thru congress. There is and there can never be any justification for late term abortions because you can not deny that is a viable life. Late term abortions are very clearly the murder of a child and all involved deserve the very same fate as that of any other child murderer, all parties, the woman, the doctor, and the politicians that allowed and inspired the murder.
I guess now we should ban all clothes hangers in this country because they are assault weapons, all clothes hanger manufactures should be put put of business, all existing clothes hangers should be confiscated, because like the guns, it is clothes hangers now that kill people? Isn't it funny how now days it is inanimate objects that kill people, not the people wielding them?
I don't know when life begins in the womb but from everything I have seen after the first trimester (maybe before) that is a viable child inside of you, ending that life from that point on is murder. You can try to justify by saying it is a fetus, sorry no, it is a child, you can say you should be able to terminate the fetus, no, that is murder of your child. Why is a woman's right to chose murder of her child more important than that child's right to live? Are you not glad your mother gave you the right to live? Not a single person on this planet was not given the right to live, all these abortion activists were given the right to live, every one of those screaming pro abortion nonsense was themselves given the right to live.
Well, that's one of the things about being "you." What other people do differently from you is weird. The trick is to realize that we're all connected and what we do to others, we do it to ourselves. It's not really a trick... it's more like a purpose.That is just weird. When I heard the ruling my first thought was to troll some libs online. Then have some lunch. Then get some work done. Then troll some libs online some more. Then head home to mow some grass. Then troll some libs online some more.
Never considered having or attending a party to celebrate libs panties being in a bunch.
You've mixed him up with @chickenhunter
"87% support abortion when the woman’s life is in danger, 84% support exceptions in the case of rape or incest, and 74% support abortion if the child would be born with a life-threatening illness."So-called "liberals" are now confronted with doing something instead of talking about it. The odds are in their favor. The USA has an 87% approval for abortion being legal. Apparently, you can still get one within 15 weeks anywhere, and up to 9 months in certain states. But, the people that want it to be legal need to get it CODIFIED INTO LAW, by legislation, not the "supreme" court. The SCOTUS is just another political football.
Great! Codify THAT into law! It's pretty simple."87% support abortion when the woman’s life is in danger, 84% support exceptions in the case of rape or incest, and 74% support abortion if the child would be born with a life-threatening illness."
The numbers drop drastically from there when you take away those exceptions.
"61% believe abortion should be legal during the first trimester, but only 34% in the second trimester and 19% in the third, and an April Wall Street Journal poll finding more Americans approve of 15-week abortion bans than disapprove."
- Forbes sourcing of AP/NORC and WSJ poll
Well of course there is the problem. For example, I could support abortion for any reason up to 15 or 20 weeks. The politicians I would vote against in my state want a complete, on-demand abortion at any stage of pregnancy. They won't relent. They won't serve the majority of their base. They want to make the fringe happy.Great! Codify THAT into law! It's pretty simple.
If the fervently pro-life/choice crowds would stop exaggerating each other's perspective, we'd all realize that more like 90% of Americans are at the exact same place on this entire issue.
Then they deserve the outcome.Well of course there is the problem. For example, I could support abortion for any reason up to 15 or 20 weeks. The politicians I would vote against in my state want a complete, on-demand abortion at any stage of pregnancy. They won't relent. They won't serve the majority of their base. They want to make the fringe happy.
I think any woman who has abortion as a means of birth control, and in particular one who goes so far as to protest the threat of loss of that option, is less likely to be using other means. What do you think? I think a woman who says she is concerned over having a baby, and that baby disrupting her education, is less likely to be using 99% effective birth control and more likely to be depending on the option of abortion. What do you think?...lolDo you seriously think the women at a pro choice rally are against using birth control?… lol
did you ask Alice...when she was ten feet tall?He places women in the highest esteem.