So you’re saying abc News made trump their bitch as well as Harris?
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
I'm saying that the debate from Tuesday was essentially 3 on 1 and Trump didn't do his best work in response.
The earlier debate with CNN, despite the fears and pundits' advance worries, was shockingly more neutral to orangeman and he landed some haymakers straight to Joe's jaw.
And, both of those went exactly as was desired.
The tl:dr is Yes.
Cody Rogers (@thatcodyrogers) on Threads
Progressive social media humorist, meme artist and amateur political commentator. Proud Wisconsinite and childful dog man. #VOTEBLUE 🔵🇺🇸. 648 Followers.
www.prod.threads.net
Not gonna click, but not surprised that you posted something hosted there. I don't do anything "Threads" as I don't need anything additional from Zuckerberg and his content controlled universe, particularly a johnnie come lately imitator of X. If it can't exist with competition and input from all, it's not worth seeing.Cody Rogers (@thatcodyrogers) on Threads
Progressive social media humorist, meme artist and amateur political commentator. Proud Wisconsinite and childful dog man. #VOTEBLUE 🔵🇺🇸. 648 Followers.
You're missing out. You could learn some valuable things by watching it. But I understand your hesitancy to be enlightened by the truth.
More specifically for you, historically corporate profits make up 11% of inflation. In this cycle, corporate profits made up 54% of inflation.
One might think that the threat of price controls would be enough to curb the price gouging more quickly. As you have seen, we have just experienced a historically fast drop in grocery prices from the highs in 2022 through now. That could of happened more quickly if certain bills weren't killed by the GOP members of congress.
Yes, yes. I'm sure that there have been many times your "truth" has been confirmed by Zuck's algorithms and content policies. It would explain much. And that doesn't even include his admission of editing things per the Harris/Biden admin's requests.
Trump's debate against Biden was every bit deranged and removed from reality. The difference was everyone was focus on Biden's lack of performance and the moderators allowed Trump to spew his nonsense without any recourse. If you go back and watch it, it was the same old guy, talking the same nonsense that he did in the Harris debate. The difference was the moderators injected some facts and Harris made him look like the fool that he's always been.
Here's a fun fact, inflation was up 25% under trump than it was under Obama. I'm pretty certain, everyone (who understands basic economics) wants some level of inflation because it's sign of a healthy economic environment. What's unacceptable imo, is doing nothing to the bad actors who took advantage of the situation.
The few members of the GOP who are still independent thinkers disagree with your assessment of the Border Security Bill.
If you are an actual conservative, the last thing you want is more executive orders. That concentration of power isn't conservative in the last bit. If a president wants a permanent solution, they need leverage to get congress to act and pass laws. An EO is nothing more than a bandaid on a problem. The moment any president uses the bandaid, they lose the leverage for a long-term fix. It should always be the last option, and only when it's clear congress won't do anything about an issue.
Keep in mind, Trump had control of congress senate for 2 years and chose to make the border situation worse because they know the problem is better for them than finding a solution. In 2019, he was calling his own border situation a "crisis".
Old Joe, simply exposed the hypocritical nature of today's GOP.
It has nothing to do with algorithms or Mark Zuckerberg. It's a School House Rock-esque cartoon that mocks Project 2025. Go ahead, watch it. You know you're curious.
1 - who the f*ck are you, two first name guy never seen here before?
2 - how would you know what point I’m making?
lol at “hate the United States.” Let’s show our love for the US by shipping money to fund a war somewhere else! How smart and patriotic!
Last edited:
They handled the debate as well as they could when you have Trump lying every time he opened his mouth.
Calling all betas.
www.foxnews.com
Dating guru claims women prefer conservative men over ‘beta liberal’ guys to feel safe ‘by a landslide’
Relationship guru and bestselling author Steve Santagati feels liberal women could prefer to find love with a conservative man in order to feel safe and respected.
Trumps new traveling companion loony loomer posted that Harris wore audio earrings to cheat in the debate. Then coincidentally later in the same day trump claims at the Vegas rally:
“I also heard she had something in the ear, a little something in the ear: ‘No, Kamala, do this. Say it this way, Kamala. OK, be quiet, too many people watching,’”
But of course he doesn’t mean what he says. Or he’s exxagerating. Or it’s out of context. Or he doesn’t mean to deceive. So never mind.
“I also heard she had something in the ear, a little something in the ear: ‘No, Kamala, do this. Say it this way, Kamala. OK, be quiet, too many people watching,’”
But of course he doesn’t mean what he says. Or he’s exxagerating. Or it’s out of context. Or he doesn’t mean to deceive. So never mind.
They only fact checked 4 of his most delusional lies - eating dogs, murdering babies, violence being up in the U.S. but down all over the world and the 2020 election.
If you (not you lol) don't like it, don't run a pathological liar. It's pretty simple stuff.
It was actually 5 fact checks. And 0 for Kamala, even though she needed 4 in the first 45 minutes of the debate. But you and your NPC brethren stay silent there.
I don’t believe Harris was wearing audio earrings or had a device in her ear
She should have been fact checked more. The Charlottesville thing, p2025 to name two off the top of my head.
Have at 'em, ladies.Calling all betas.
Dating guru claims women prefer conservative men over ‘beta liberal’ guys to feel safe ‘by a landslide’
Relationship guru and bestselling author Steve Santagati feels liberal women could prefer to find love with a conservative man in order to feel safe and respected.
#dating4losers
Last edited:
Meh.Have at em ladies.
You get a failing grade for imitation/lack of originality, and another failing grade for poor presentation (disproportional photo sizes and arrangement).
😂
Don’t be mad because I beat you at your own game. And don’t be mad I beat you at my own game. Try not to be mad.
I hope they start writing stories on illegals with overdue books. Whatever it takes.
Is that your Donald Trump post-debate-beatdown imitation? "I won! I won!"
Fiddy cent. 🤣
Is that an outlier viewpoint in Poland or widespread?
Poland has occasionally made unsympathetic noises toward Ukraine since the war started. Some about refugees, iirc, and maybe other issues.
Maybe Poland and Russia can agree to split Ukraine - sort of like how Germany and the Soviet Union (temporarily) agreed to split Poland.
If I were a candidate one of my first directives would be to my social media campaign to not make me look like a lying idiot. But well….too late.
Jesus we have another thoroughly misguided lib talking nonsense here. The only thing I'll address is what has already been addressed here many times over, and that's the border bill. The so-called border bill was so loaded with funding for things other than our border that less than a third was to be applied that way. The bill was killed because it was a shitty, shifty attempt to extort sensible and not so sensible republicans into supporting it just because it was ostensibly about OUR border. It was not. Thank God somebody woke up and ended that particular dem subterfuge.
And don't even bother with but but but it was a republican bill. It was both republican and dem, but the dems were taking advantage of the republicans desire to fix the border.
Fewer illegals now? Of course, there's an election looming. The slowing of illegal immigration could have been affected at any time during the introduction of TEN FVCKING MILLION by Biden/Harris. So why only now? You know the answer, or you are as dumb as your post makes you seem to be.
Wait, I'll also address the numbnutted crowing over reduced inflation. Inflation given is current. It is heaped on top of previously much greater inflation rates as represented by current dramatically higher prices. If you want to crow about something, crow about those prices coming down and not how they aren't skyrocketing as fast as they were. Of course you can't, so you have nothing at all to crow about there.
That nitwit is a nitwit who wants to give $25,000 to those who need help with the down payment on a new house. She also says she's going to goose new home construction. Gee, does that sound familiar at all? Can you say housing bubble? And she will most definitely revert her thinking back to quasi-marxism if she gets elected, abandoning all these policy shifts that she has suddenly adopted in order to get elected. You truly have to be a moron to not see that..
If Trump looked foolish, he made himself look that way. Harris just chuckled for effect and lied her ass off. It was play-acting.
eta; oh and BTW, I got a good laugh over the dems rejecting the extremes. Who are you, Karen Jean-Pierre?
Last edited:
Next trump rally: “In springfield Ohio illegals are killing artistic children with their cars, it’s terrible, these kids, they just want to do art, just imagine, your child is coloring and then a car runs them over”
How many polacks does it take to go to war?
none, they can’t find it on a map
it's making a point just fine that does not indicate in any way support for Putin or hatred of the U.S. The point is that Poles don't want to take part in instigating WW III (for obvious reasons), and a particular Pole voiced their concerns that the U'S. is poking the bear maybe a little too hard without due consideration for who would suffer the most. . Really, it's a bear that's being poked, at least symbolically..
How do you know ww3 has started?
the French have surrendered
As long as they keep it over there and it doesn’t cost us or inconvenience us, then whatever. Let me know how it all shakes out.
I posted before the debate that ABC said they did not provide the questions....but they didn't say they didn't provide answers. That might sound silly, but there's any number of ways to work around the truth, in order to say you didn't lie and cheat. Just ask you-know-who.
And I have to wonder if her reactions to Trump wasn't set up. She was putting on too much of a show. They should have taken the camera off whoever wasn't currently responding. The simple fact is that most people aren't sinking their teeth into what's being conveyed, they are just getting impressions of who seems to be more in charge.
Just for clarity, I didn't watch it. I had every intention of doing so but I had to switch it off before she was done lying through her first response. She repulses me that much. I have seen segments and snippets since then.
well let me put it this way. I'm not dumb enough to think anyone takes that literally unless they just want to.. If they're that dumb, they probably also believe there really are 'magatard spy rings'.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
Everything UNC OC & QB Coach Chip Lindsey Said About Jacolby Criswell
- Latest: andrew jones
-
