ADVERTISEMENT

Pizzagate

UNC71-00 said:
I do know that the lawsuit was dropped and the accuser admitted making it up, but I am also not so naive as to think that she could have been pressured to do so.
Click to expand...
The lawsuit was dropped but she never said she made it up. At the press conference scheduled to discuss the case, her attorney said she cancelled because of death threats:

"Jane Doe has received numerous threats today, as have all the Trump accusers that I have represented,” said the woman’s attorney, Lisa Bloom.

“She is living in fear. She has decided that she is too afraid to show her face. She has been here all day, ready to do it, but unfortunately, she's in terrible fear. So we're going to have to reschedule. I apologize to all of you who came."

Tell me what I'm supposed to see in the Instagrams. It looks like an account owned by a gay proprietor of a pizza joint.
 
UNC71-00 said:
The difference being "alleged" vs "on the manifest" But that being said, I do want to know if Trump was down there and breaking the law.
Click to expand...
Like I said, Trump probably won't appear on the manifest because he would have had his own transportation. The alleged teen rape took place at one of Epstein's notorious house parties. What's interesting about the lawsuit is that it was submitted with an eyewitness affidavit, which is virtually unheard of. The accuser and the witness both have checkered pasts. There was no evidence (police report, rape kit, etc.) so the case would have come down to their testimony. That, combined with the possible political motivation behind the case, would have made it extremely difficult to prove guilt IMO.
 
Raising Heel said:
Tell me what I'm supposed to see in the Instagrams. It looks like an account owned by a gay proprietor of a pizza joint.
Click to expand...

I'm going to have to poast the pics tomorrow when I get back to a computer because I don't think we are looking at the same images.
 
Raising Heel said:
I can see the images, although I stopped after maybe the first 10. Why don't you just describe which one you're looking at and explain why it's so shocking.
Click to expand...

Why don't you look at all of them? You can do that quicker than I can describe them.

Why the hostility? How often do I poast flat out bullshit? I would think you could show me the respect of looking at the entire link before arguing that I am FOS

ETA never mind, I will poast some of the more disturbing ones so everyone can see them
 
Last edited:
Be sure to read the comments

GWqZJf.png


ZuVzcG.png


AnQdeG.png


kS7g5p.png


26uxa6.jpg


xT30mh.png

This one is an adaptation of a Ted Bundy pic that he took of someone he killed. It's in Podestas house. That seems normal enough


yH0K23.png


FnGuyR.png




M45wd2.jpg


Shall I continue?
 
UNC71-00 said:
Could be. Did you look at the Instagram poasts (and read the comments) by the owner of Comet Pizza? If not, here's the link.

https://sli.mg/a/gaffhM

What's your opinion of those poasts?
Click to expand...
I looked through those and at first glance nothing jumped out at me. Typical pictures I see myself on Instagram and Facebook of typical things with babies and others. I then "tried" to look at them with a twisted mind and honestly I just don't get it. I don't see anything bizarre or alarming. I guess everything I post myself could be twisted if someone thought I was into some bizarre crap like that.

I could be accused of loving animals too much and if someone decided I was probably into beastiality then they'd twist every post I have to reflect that opinion. I'd hate to think of the crazy sh*t someone would conclude from the ones I took and posted yesterday from Strum and I going antique shopping/browsing. Lord, the things wicked minds come up with.

I must be gullible and clueless so what did you get from those pictures?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raising Heel
chick_bleeds_carolina_blue said:
I looked through those and at first glance nothing jumped out at me. Typical pictures I see myself on Instagram and Facebook of typical things with babies and others. I then "tried" to look at them with a twisted mind and honestly I just don't get it. I don't see anything bizarre or alarming. I guess everything I post myself could be twisted if someone thought I was into some bizarre crap like that.

I could be accused of loving animals too much and if someone decided I was probably into beastiality then they'd twist every post I have to reflect that opinion. I'd hate to think of the crazy sh*t someone would conclude from the ones I took and posted yesterday from Strum and I going antique shopping/browsing. Lord, the things wicked minds come up with.

I must be gullible and clueless so what did you get from those pictures?
Click to expand...

Some of them are absolutely creepy on the surface and some of them become creepy when considering the guy is conspiratorially accused of running a pedophile sex ring.

I wouldn't let my kids go over to the house where one of the parents poasted those pics on their instagram feed.

As I have said before ITT, this may all be an overblown conspiracy with no validity. But it seems to me there is enough there to warrant further investigation.

And that's all I have to say about this matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chick_bleeds_carolina_blue
UNC71-00 said:
Why don't you look at all of them? You can do that quicker than I can describe them.
Click to expand...
I didn't look at all of them because it started to feel like a snipe hunt.

After looking at the ones you poasted, I still don't get what the problem is. They look like pictures of children, probably those of friends' children. Like chick said, if somebody accused me a bestiality, I'm sure my Twitter feed would start to look pretty weird. The last one is certainly graphic but appears to be "art" that's publicly on display.

UNC71-00 said:
xT30mh.png

This one is an adaptation of a Ted Bundy pic that he took of someone he killed. It's in Podestas house. That seems normal enough.
Click to expand...
It took me less than 30 seconds to confirm this is a replica of a piece called Arch of Hysteria that's on display at the National Gallery of Canada in Ottawa, not an adaptation of a Ted Bundy pic.

UNC71-00 said:
Why the hostility? How often do I poast flat out bullshit? I would think you could show me the respect of looking at the entire link before arguing that I am FOS.
Click to expand...
I never suggested that you were FOS. I just didn't understand what you were so outraged about. I still don't. If you could hear yourself, I think you'd realize that you do sound pretty ridiculous right now.
 
Raising Heel said:
It took me less than 30 seconds to confirm this is a replica of a piece called Arch of Hysteria that's on display at the National Gallery of Canada in Ottawa, not an adaptation of a Ted Bundy pic.
Click to expand...

There you go. I took Twitter at it's words as other things have checked out (not just about this, but the past 12 months) from that feed.

Raising Heel said:
I never suggested that you were FOS. I just didn't understand what you were so outraged about. I still don't. If you could hear yourself, I think you'd realize that you do sound pretty ridiculous right now.
Click to expand...

I'm not that outraged at all, TBH. Just think there might be something there.

But I also realize that talking about conspiracies can make anyone sound ridiculous, which I why I am done with this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raising Heel
Yep, if this was true it would've come up a long time ago. If it doesn't make sense then it's likely a bunch of nonsense.

The Clinton's have soooo many legitimate things that can be used against them that it isn't necessary to make stuff up. Things like this take away credibility of actual issues with them and thus those things also become unbelievable or looked at skeptically and eventually swept under the rug.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back