SB 53 thread
- Thread starter gteeitup
- Start date
Haters gonna hate, but that gets called all day long in the current NFL. In college the guy probably would have been ejected.
Do what?! I made dinner during halftime and had the volume down. Still managed to see the awful guitar prop and the tacky removal of clothing. But he actually faked a guitar solo? What an embarrassing spectacle that must've been. How did nobody talk him out of this stupid shit?
Yeah that definitely was a pre-recorded guitar solo. At one point he had his hands in an entirely wrong part of the neck for the notes that were being played. Most people wouldn’t have caught it because he turned his back to the main camera.
I realize that it was a "direct hit"... but, it wasn't an illegal hit from my vantage point. I guess I had watched too many of the old Super Bowl highlights from the 70s and 80s. I knew that the Pat's player's head was pushed back. But, the tackle itself was direct and forceful... not illegal. I don't think he led with the helmet.
He's not leading with the crown. He's just squarely making FULL contact. He's using his arms to wrap him up and there's no room for the head to go anywhere but back. His facemask is pushing his head back.From the back angle which noone is showing
Lol well I'm pretty sure he's ghey, so you've got nothing to worry about there.
I completely agree. I wouldn't have called that. How in the world are you supposed to tackle anyone these days?
It was aggressive, and it "looked" harmful... but, it's football.
They need a Jack Tatum League.
You don't have to be leading with the crown to get the flag. His helmet hitting Burkhead's helmet was the first point of contact.
I think the rule is a little over the top, but it was called correctly according to the rule.
Contact to the head or neck area on a defenseless player is personal foul nowadays. We can argue that it shouldn't be, and I think a lot of people would agree with you, but that's the rules.
Not always. Officials in the league are so utterly inconsistent with this particular call it should be embarrassing.
I contend Burkhead was not defenseless. After the catch he turned a full 90 degrees and took two steps. I understand the validity of the rule when a receiver is in a crossing route or on a slant, focusing on the football when he gets blindsided by a defender. I believe that was the original intent of the rule.
On the other hand, a running back catching a short pass behind the line of scrimmage on a screen who is stopped by a cornerback making the correct read and a proper form tackle deserves to be tackled. The way the rule obviously stands this day and age, the defender is supposed to whiff on the ball carrier and allow him to run by. That is stupid, illogical bullshit. The NFL sucks.
Last edited:
Left is before my sausage/cream cheese/salsa super bowl dip, right is after
so he’s covering prince, another elite guitarist, imo...just in case we need to confirm, watch him shred.
To add my .02 to the thread. I love to see a good defensive battle. Both teams defenses played lights out football. And I was glad to see the Rams lose. The Saints should have been in the SB and not the Rams. And even though I am not a TB fan, he is the GOAT.
I heard about that. Love the move by the guy in the white t-shirt in the beginning. Getting tackled, but managed to throw the dude head first into the car on the way down. Nighty night.
I watched exactly 20 seconds of this before bowing out. Please note that at the 0:10 second mark and the 0:19 second mark, you can hear a chord being strummed but he's not actually playing anything.
Yeah, he has another guitar player doing most of the rhythm during Purple Rain.
ETA: He is playing the solo, however.
Last edited:
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Daily Drop: Is It Time for a Referendum on Hubert Davis?- Latest: What Would Jesus Do?
-
