That's not how you internet.
That's not how you internet.
Honestly the best equalizer might be that this game will be on turf. Uneven bounces and stuff might throw off Argentina attacks that otherwise would be lethal.Do we have a chance against Argentina tonight? I think not
Do we have a chance against Argentina tonight? I think not
Hmm. I'd throw a $25 spot on the U.S. at +400. I've got an okay feeling about the game. Sure, Messi is scary good, but if he has an off-night, no one else on Argentina is playing THAT good so far in this tourney.Argentina to advance is -600, and the USA is +400. I'm gonna guess 2-0 Argentina tonight.
Hmm. I'd throw a $25 spot on the U.S. at +400. I've got an okay feeling about the game. Sure, Messi is scary good, but if he has an off-night, no one else on Argentina is playing THAT good so far in this tourney.
Well played. I cannot be held responsible, however, if we lose 4-0.Fair enough - I just threw the $25 on the USA. Hopefully it works out.
Well played. I cannot be held responsible, however, if we lose 4-0.
What's your guy's line on Colombia vs. Chile tomorrow? I bet it's heavily inflated in Chile's favor.
Yeah, the "to advance" lines are always less appealing but that's a pretty terrible line both ways but especially for Colombia. I'd stay away from that line unless you wanna parlay it with the O/U or something.To advance is Chile -125 and Columbia -105.
Speaking of big lines like this Argentina one, how often -- if ever -- do you bet a sizable amount on a heavy favorite like that just to win a fraction of what you put down? Sometimes in the early rounds of those tennis tournaments, the favorites are like -1500 on the moneyline or something crazy like that. And if you can get a moneyline on college FB or BB games in real lopsided matchups, the favorite will be like -1800 to win.Argentina to advance is -600, and the USA is +400. I'm gonna guess 2-0 Argentina tonight.
Yeah, the "to advance" lines are always less appealing but that's a pretty terrible line both ways but especially for Colombia. I'd stay away from that line unless you wanna parlay it with the O/U or something.
Speaking of big lines like this Argentina one, how often -- if ever -- do you bet a sizable amount on a heavy favorite like that just to win a fraction of what you put down? Sometimes in the early rounds of those tennis tournaments, the favorites are like -1500 on the moneyline or something crazy like that. And if you can get a moneyline on college FB or BB games in real lopsided matchups, the favorite will be like -1800 to win.
Good job.Well played. I cannot be held responsible, however, if we lose 4-0.
Pump the brakes there, bro. Ronaldo > Messi.At least the loss comes at the hands of the greatest player in history.
Pump the brakes there, bro. Ronaldo > Messi.
Put Messi in the Prem and how many goals would he score? Way less than usual. That league ain't La Liga where they call fouls for breathing too hard on an opponent. Ronaldo dominated in EPL and I have way more respect for his game because of it. Messi's brittle little body would break on away trips to Stoke and Crystal Palace and West Ham.
England are
One game doesn't mean anything. I don't put a ton of stock in the Champions League in terms of evaluating which league(s) are superior.I've never got the argument about Messi not being able to play in the Premier League, but...
Barcelona v Chelsea, 2005/06:
Terrible pitch, Mourinho ordered Chelsea to kick the crap out of a teenage Messi.
He still destroyed them.
I think people forget Messi grew up playing on the streets of Rosario. He can take a beating if needed, but players don't usually get close enough to him to kick him.
It's not soccer lingo, it's British lingo. They love using the collective verb "are" with what should be a single entity.This is one thing that irks me about soccer lingo. Maybe this is even grammatically correct, but it just sounds weird to me. We use the plural when using the team nickname "The Tar Heels are" "The Bruins are" "The Braves are" etc. But when using the city/state/country name, we use the singular "North Carolina is" "Boston is" "Atlanta is" etc.
He would be Paulus. I hope that's what you're insinuating.Messi in the EPL would be like Danny Green on Paulus
It's not soccer lingo, it's British lingo. They love using the collective verb "are" with what should be a single entity.
Oh you may have, but that's probably just queerbaits like Bob Ley who want to sound British.Ah, fair enough. I thought I had heard it in regards to MLS teams and in non-British commentary on the Euro and World Cup and whatnot, but I could be mistaken.
Oh you may have, but that's probably just queerbaits like Bob Ley who want to sound British.